The Cost-effectiveness of Hysterosalpingography Versus Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography During Fertility Work-up (FOil)

April 23, 2024 updated by: Prof. Velja Mijatovic, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Is, in Infertile Women Undergoing a Basic Fertility Work-up, Tubal Flushing With Oil-based Contrast Medium During Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Cost-effective Compared to Tubal Flushing by Hysterosalpingo-foam Sonography (HyFoSy)?

Hysterosalpingography (HSG) and hysterosalpingo-foam sonography are two methods to assess tubal patency during fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG compared to tubal flushing during HyFoSy in women undergoing fertility work-up. The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births than tubal flushing during HyFoSy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: The diagnostic work-up for infertility generally includes estimating the risk for tubal pathology and if indicated assessing tubal patency. Traditionally, tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up is performed with hysterosalpingography (HSG). In previous studies it has been demonstrated that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG resulted in more ongoing pregnancies than when HSG is performed with water-based contrast. HyFoSy is a more patient friendly alternative for HSG. Up till now, the fertility enhancing effect of tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy has only been studied in relatively small and observational studies.

Objectives:The main objective of this study is to determine whether tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG results into more pregnancies leading to live births when compared to tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy, and whether this approach is cost-effective. In this study the safety of both strategies will also be compared.

Rationale: The hypothesis is that tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG leads to more live births compared to tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy in women with an indication for tubal patency testing. If more live births are achieved, expensive fertility treatments will be less needed, which makes tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG a cost-effective strategy.

Study design: This study is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with an economic analysis alongside it. Women with indication for tubal patency testing will be randomized to tubal flushing with oil-based contrast during HSG and tubal flushing with ExEm Foam during HyFoSy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Infertile women or women with oligo-or anovulation
  • Indication for tubal patency testing during the fertility work-up
  • Sufficient understanding of the Dutch or English language
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe male factor with a total motile sperm count <3x106ml (pre-washed)
  • Known contrast (iodine) allergy
  • Women who have had a gynecologic procedure within the last 30 days
  • Women with known or suspected reproductive tract neoplasia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Tubal flushing during HSG with oil-based contrast
Tubal flushing during HSG HSG will be performed by a gynaecologist, fertility doctor or nurse according to local protocols. HSG will be performed in the follicular phase of the cycle. Preferably, HSG is performed in the next cycle after randomization, but if this is not feasible the procedure may be postponed up till one month after randomization. After cleaning the vagina and cervix, a vacuum cervix adapter will be applied to the cervix or a Lipiodol resistant balloon catheter or hysterophore will be placed through the cervix. Up to 15ml of Lipiodol Ultra Fluid will be injected into the uterine cavity and its spread directly monitored by fluoroscopy. Six to eight radiographs will be taken and assessed by a gynaecologist or radiologist. The maximum amount of oil-based contrast medium is set at 15ml.
oil-based contrast fluid, Lipiodol Ultra Fluid. Lipiodol is a solution of iodinated ethyl esters of fatty acids of poppyseed oil. Equivalent to 480 mg iodine per ml. The maximum dosage is 15ml. Lipiodol is produced by Guerbet, France. Lipiodol is FDA approved and registered as contrast agent for HSG.
Active Comparator: Tubal flushing HyFoSy
Tubal flushing during HyFoSy will be performed by a gynaecologist, fertility doctor, sonographer or nurse according to local protocols. HyFoSy will be performed in the follicular phase of the cycle. Preferably, HyFosy is performed in the next cycle after randomization, but if this is not feasible the procedure may be postponed up till one month after randomization. During HyFoSy approximately 5-10cc of foam will be introduced through a little cervical balloon-less applicator into the uterine cavity. During infusion of the foam into the uterine cavity, a transvaginal ultrasound will be performed which shows whether the Fallopian tubes are patent. The assessment of the procedure will be done by the one who performed the procedure.
ExEm Foam which is created by mixing 5ml ExEm-gel and 5ml of purified water. ExEm-gel contains hydroxyethylcellulose and glycerol. The ExEm Foam is distributed by IQ Medical Ventures, the Netherlands. ExEm Foam is FDA approved, CE marked and registered as contrast agent for HyFoSy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of pregnancies leading to live birth.
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Pregnancy is defined as a positive pregnancy test, increase in human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level or a pregnancy shown on ultrasonographic examination. Live birth is defined as the birth of live baby born beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy.
within six months after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to pregnancy leading to live birth
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Calculated from the day of randomization till the first day of the last menstrual bleeding before a positive pregnancy test.
within six months after randomization
Number of clinical pregnancies
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Clinical pregnancy is defined as gestational sac with or without heartbeat visible on ultrasound.
within six months after randomization
Number of miscarriages
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Miscarriage is defined as presence of non-vitality on ultrasound or spontaneous loss off pregnancy
within six months after randomization
Number of multiple pregnancies
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Multiple pregnancy is defined as two or more vital intrauterine pregnancies at 12 weeks gestation.
within six months after randomization
Number of adverse events
Time Frame: within one months after tubal patency testing
e.g. infection, intravasation, thyroid dysfunction
within one months after tubal patency testing
Procedural pain scores
Time Frame: Within 15 minutes after tubal patency testing
measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) on a scale from 0.0 to 10.0 centimeter immediately after tubal patency testing.
Within 15 minutes after tubal patency testing
Number of fertility treatment cycles
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
e.g. intra uterine insemination, in vitro fertilization, intracytoplasmatic sperm injection
within six months after randomization
Number of pregnancy complications
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
e.g. pregnancy induced hypertension, fetal growth restriction, still birth.
within six months after randomization
Number of ectopic pregnancies
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Ectopic pregnancy is defined as no intrauterine gestational sac with: an ectopic gestational sac OR HCG concentration >1500 international units per liter (IU/L) with free fluid/ectopic mass on ultrasound or serum HCG >2000IU/L without free fluid/ectopic mass on ultrasound
within six months after randomization
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: within six months after randomization
Comparing the costs (including costs for tubal patency testing and additional fertility treatments) and the effects (chance of live birth)
within six months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 22, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infertility

Clinical Trials on Oil-based contrast

3
Subscribe