Evaluating the Long-term Neurocognitive Effects of Preconceptional Exposure to Iodinated Contrast on the Offspring (Neuro-H2Oil)

January 26, 2022 updated by: Prof. Velja Mijatovic, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Evaluating the Long-term Neurocognitive Effects of Preconceptional Exposure to Iodinated Contrast During Hysterosalpingography (HSG) on the Offspring of the H2Oil Trial

Iodinated contrast is commonly used in hysterosalpingography (HSG), a diagnostic tool in fertility work-up. This study aims to investigate the safety of contrast media used during HSG by evaluating the long-term effects on the neurodevelopment of offspring 6-8 years after exposure to iodinated contrast media.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

Background: Iodinated contrast is commonly used in hysterosalpingography (HSG), a diagnostic tool in fertility work-up. Yet excessive iodine may pool for a long time in the body, crosses the placenta easily, and can induce hypothyroidism in both mothers and foetuses. Inadequate supplies of thyroid hormones have previously been associated with neurocognitive impairments in offspring. Considering the widespread use of iodinated contrast during fertility work-up, the potential iatrogenic effect of preconceptional iodine exposure on the brain development of the offspring needs to be addressed urgently.

Objectives: This project aims to investigate the safety of contrast media used during HSG by evaluating the long-term effects on the neurodevelopment of offspring 6-8 years after exposure to iodinated contrast media. To do this, the investigators will follow up on a cohort of offspring conceived during the H2Oil randomised controlled trial (NTR 3270), which was set up to evaluate the effect of using water- or oil-based media during HSG on pregnancy rates.

Methods: The study team have previously obtained parental permission for follow-up research in 140 children conceived during the H2Oil study <6 months after exposure to iodine during the HSG. The investigators will conduct comprehensive an in-depth outcome assessment of intelligence, neurocognitive development, school performance, and behavioural functioning.

Relevance: Using this diverse range of methods, the investigators expect to be the first to shed light on the long-term iatrogenic consequences of using iodinated contrast just before conception on the neurodevelopment of their offspring. The findings of this study will have implications for current clinical practice, where HSG is readily used in subfertile women, and will be used to inform the Dutch guidelines for fertility work-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
        • Emma Kinderziekenhuis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 10 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Children born to mothers who participated in the original H2Oil study (NTR3270), a multicentre randomised controlled trial on oil- versus water-based HSG in 2012-2014 whose parents gave consent to be contacted for follow up studies (n=140).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children conceived after the mother underwent HSG procedure in the context of the H2Oil trial (2012-2014)
  • Children must be conceived <6 months after the HSG procedure
  • Parents must have given consent for recontacting for follow up research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children conceived after the mother underwent HSG procedure that was not part of the H2Oil trial
  • Children conceived >6 months after the HSG procedure
  • Children whose parents did not give permission to be recontacted for follow up research
  • Children that are not able to comprehend the instructions at the time of assessment
  • Absence or withdrawal of written informed consent
  • Inability to comprehend testing instructions at time of assessment
  • Severe motor disability that interferes with outcome assessment at time of assessment
  • Documented and/or parent-reported diagnosis of a neurological disorder
  • Somatic disorders known to affect the outcome assessments at time of assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
School performance
Time Frame: Between the ages of 4-12, up to 12 years
Longitudinal data on school performance will be collected using standardised tests from the pupil monitoring system developed by the Dutch National Institute for Educational Measurement (CITO-test). CITO-tests are used to assess children's academic performance (reading comprehension, spelling, and arithmetic performance) in primary schools in the Netherlands.
Between the ages of 4-12, up to 12 years
Intelligence
Time Frame: 1 Day
General intelligence will be assessed using a shortened Fifth version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Full-scale IQ (FSIQ) will be estimated using the subtests Vocabulary, Similarities, Matrix Reasoning, and Block Design.
1 Day
Behavioural functioning evaluated through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).
Time Frame: 1 Day
Behavioural functioning will be evaluated through the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Both parents and teachers will fill in the SDQ.
1 Day
Behavioural functioning evaluated through the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms And Normal behaviour (SWAN) scale.
Time Frame: 1 Day
Behavioural functioning will be evaluated will be evaluated using the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms And Normal behaviour (SWAN) scale. Both parents and teachers will fill in the SWAN scale.
1 Day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visuomotor integration
Time Frame: 1 Day
Visuomotor integration will be assessed using a Track & Trace task of the Emma Toolbox for Neurocognitive Functioning, which is an in-house designed battery of computerised tests for assessing different neurocognitive domains.
1 Day
Processing & Control
Time Frame: 1 Day
Processing & Control will be assessed using an Attention Network Test of the Emma Toolbox for Neurocognitive Functioning, which is an in-house designed battery of computerised tests for assessing different neurocognitive domains.
1 Day
Visual Memory
Time Frame: 1 Day
Visual Memory will be assessed using an Location Learning Test of the Emma Toolbox for Neurocognitive Functioning, which is an in-house designed battery of computerised tests for assessing different neurocognitive domains.
1 Day
Verbal Memory
Time Frame: 1 Day
Verbal Memory will be assessed using a Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Dutch Version) of the Emma Toolbox for Neurocognitive Functioning, which is an in-house designed battery of computerised tests for assessing different neurocognitive domains.
1 Day
Visual Working Memory
Time Frame: 1 Day
Visual Working Memory will be assessed using a Klinberg task of the Emma Toolbox for Neurocognitive Functioning, which is an in-house designed battery of computerised tests for assessing different neurocognitive domains.
1 Day
Verbal Working Memory
Time Frame: 1 Day
Verbal Working Memory will be assessed using a Digit Span task of the Emma Toolbox for Neurocognitive Functioning, which is an in-house designed battery of computerised tests for assessing different neurocognitive domains.
1 Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marsh Königs, PhD, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 26, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurocognitive Disorders

3
Subscribe