Effect of Radial Shockwave on Calf Muscle Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

May 27, 2023 updated by: Hisham Mohamed Hussein, University of Hail

Effect of Radial Shock Wave Therapy on Calf Muscle Tone, ROM, Gross Motor Scale, Plantar Surface and Quality of Life in Patients With Cerebral Palsy: Randomized Controlled Trial

the aim of this study to assess different outcome measures after applying standard physical therapy plus radial shockwave and compare the results with another group who received standard treatment only.

Design: double-blinded (assessor and data analyzer)

Methods: This study will be conducted in 4 rehabilitation facilities, Times for 1 month of intervention Assessment timeline: 3 times (T0: at baseline, T1: at 4 weeks, T2: follow up at 3 months. Outcome measures: the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Ankle ROM, Plantar surface area, Gross motor function, and quality of life

Study Overview

Detailed Description

the current study is a randomized controlled trial in which the researchers intended to examine the effect of adding radial shockwave therapy to standard physical therapy on the status of calf muscle spasticity and consequent effects on gross motor function, ankle joint ROM, plantar surface area, and quality of life.

the experimental intervention will consist of 4 sessions of radial shockwave applied to the bulkiest area of the calf muscle in children having spastic cerebral palsy. participants will receive 1 session of radial shockwave per week and will continue their regular physical therapy as usual (3 sessions per week).

outcome assessment will be conducted 3 times: at baseline, after the end of the treatment program, and at 3 months follow-up.

the tools that will be used to collect data will be:

  1. Modified Ashworth scale for muscle tone.
  2. Goniometer for Ankle ROM.
  3. EMed force platform for plantar surface area
  4. Gross motor function scale for gross motor function
  5. Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for quality of life assessment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age between 8-14
  • diagnosed with spastic CP
  • ability to walk alone or with assistance
  • grades 1 -4 on Gross Motor Function Classification System
  • at least score 1 on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
  • ability to attend the treatment program and the outcome assessment sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who received a botulinum toxin injection in the calf muscle during the last six months
  • structural contracture of the calf muscle
  • surgery in the lower extremity during the previous year
  • those experiencing pain in the lower limbs
  • severe associated neurological diseases as epilepsy
  • medications affecting peripheral muscle tone.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Standard physical therapy program
all participants will receive strengthing, stretching, facilitation and inhibitory techniques, splinting, developmental techniques, gait, and balance training. The duration of each session will be 1 hour, 3 times per week for 4 weeks.
Regular rehabilitation procedures consist of strengthing, stretching, facilitation and inhibitory techniques, splinting, developmental techniques, gait and balance training, and advice to parents. The duration of each session will be 1 hour, 3 times per week for 4 weeks
Other Names:
  • Standard physical therapy intervention
Active Comparator: Radial shockwave therapy (rSWT)
One session per week of rSWT will be applied using shockwave device. The following parameters will be used: Shocks number: 1500 per muscle, will be applied over the belly of the calf muscle using the 15 mm applicator head. The pressure will be 2 bar and the frequency will be 4 Hz. Patients will receive shock wave from prone position.
One session per week of rSWT will be applied using the BMI-1120 SHOCK MED device (BIO-MED-INC- ITALY). The following parameters will be used: Shocks number: 1500 per muscle, will be applied over the belly of the calf muscle using the 15 mm applicator head. The pressure will be 2 bar and the frequency will be 4 Hz. Patients will receive shock wave from prone position.
Other Names:
  • Radial shock wave therapy (rSWT)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
calf muscle tone
Time Frame: at baseline
the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) will be used to assess the tone of the affected calf muscle. the test will be done by moving the ankle joint passively and assess quality of movement and resistance provided by the tissues. scores ranged from 0 to 4 where 0 means normal and 4 means higher spasticity
at baseline
calf muscle tone
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) will be used to assess the tone of the affected calf muscle. the test will be done by moving the ankle joint passively and assess quality of movement and resistance provided by the tissues. scores ranged from 0 to 4 where 0 means normal and 4 means higher spasticity
at 4 weeks
calf muscle tone
Time Frame: at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
the Modified Ashworth scale (MAS) will be used to assess the tone of the affected calf muscle. the test will be done by moving the ankle joint passively and assess quality of movement and resistance provided by the tissues. scores ranged from 0 to 4 where 0 means normal and 4 means higher spasticity
at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
ankle joint ROM
Time Frame: at baseline
traditional goniometer will be used to measure active ROM of the ankle joint. the patient will be in supine position during assessment
at baseline
ankle joint ROM
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
traditional goniometer will be used to measure active ROM of the ankle joint. the patient will be in supine position during assessment
at 4 weeks
ankle joint ROM
Time Frame: at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
traditional goniometer will be used to measure active ROM of the ankle joint. the patient will be in supine position during assessment
at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
plantar surface area
Time Frame: at baseline
E Med force platform will be used to assess plantar surface area during normal relaxed standing. it will be expected that larger surface area indicate improvement in calf muscle spasticity
at baseline
plantar surface area
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
E Med force platform will be used to assess plantar surface area during normal relaxed standing. it will be expected that larger surface area indicate improvement in calf muscle spasticity
at 4 weeks
plantar surface area
Time Frame: at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
E Med force platform will be used to assess plantar surface area during normal relaxed standing. it will be expected that larger surface area indicate improvement in calf muscle spasticity
at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
gross-motor function
Time Frame: at baseline
Gross Motor Function Measure scale will be used to assess changes in gross motor. function in cerebral palsy patients. the score will be determined according to the tasks the patient can do. where lower score (1) for nealy normal patients while score of (5) will indicate lowest gross motor abilities.
at baseline
gross-motor function
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Gross Motor Function Measure scale will be used to assess changes in gross motor. function in cerebral palsy patients. the score will be determined according to the tasks the patient can do. where lower score (1) for nealy normal patients while score of (5) will indicate lowest gross motor abilities.
at 4 weeks
gross-motor function
Time Frame: at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
Gross Motor Function Measure scale will be used to assess changes in gross motor. function in cerebral palsy patients. the score will be determined according to the tasks the patient can do. where lower score (1) for nealy normal patients while score of (5) will indicate lowest gross motor abilities.
at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cerebral palsy quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: at baseline
Parents will be asked to report their level of quality of life using the Cerebral Palsy Qualityof life questionnair. the higher the gained score the better the quality of life achieved.
at baseline
cerebral palsy quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: at 4 weeks
Parents will be asked to report their level of quality of life using the Cerebral Palsy Qualityof life questionnair. the higher the gained score the better the quality of life achieved.
at 4 weeks
cerebral palsy quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)
Parents will be asked to report their level of quality of life using the Cerebral Palsy Qualityof life questionnair. the higher the gained score the better the quality of life achieved.
at follow up (3months after the end of the treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hisham M Hussein, PHD, University of Hail

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 13, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Standard physical therapy program

3
Subscribe