- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05893615
Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Quality of Life in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients
June 5, 2023 updated by: Qu Shan, Peking University People's Hospital
Effects of Cognitive Behavior Therapy on Anxiety, Depression, Illness Perception, and Quality of Life in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Patients
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) was commonly impaired in atrial fibrillation patients.
Depression, anxiety, and illness perception are psychological correlates of HRQoL.
Our previous study had shown good effects of CBT on the quality of life in AF patients.
This study aimed to establish the long-term efficacy of CBT on both psychological distress and HRQoL.
Method: The study was a prospective, open study, pseudo-randomization with a pretest-posttest design and a 6-month follow-up.
A total of 102 patients with paroxysmal AF were enrolled, and 90 patients were assigned (1:1) to 10 weeks of CBT focused on anxiety symptoms or to treat as usual in the end.
Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), GAD-7, PHQ-9, University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation (AFSS), and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) were measured as outcomes.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
102
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100044
- Minjie Zheng
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The inclusion criteria for participation were: (a) age 18-75 years; (b) AF diagnosis, based on a 12-lead ECG and cardiologist-led examination following the 2016 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation5 and (c) paroxysmal AF diagnosis given by a cardiologist according to the conversion back to the normal sinus rhythm occurs spontaneously within a week 18. (d) ability to read and write in Chinese.
Exclusion Criteria:
- (a) severe complications such as unstable coronary artery disease, heart failure with severe systolic dysfunction(ejection fraction≤35%); (b)AF soon after thoracic surgery; (c) malignant disease with a 1-year survival rate or a terminal illness diagnosis; (d) a diagnosed psychiatric condition that interfered with participation (including severe depression, bipolar disorder, psychotic illness of any type, dementia, acute suicidality, severe personality disorder);(e) regular psychological therapy with a mental health condition; (f) participation in another study; (g) cognitive impairment interfering with their ability to participate in the study.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: CBT group
Patients in the CBT intervention group, who received CBT focused on anxiety symptoms in addition to their usual treatment, including 10 one-hour sessions spread over 10 weeks, and weekly homework guided by the therapist.
|
The CBT module was adjusted as follows: (1) Health education about paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; (2) Self-awareness training; (3) Exposure training; (4) Habitual reversal training;(5) Correcting cognitive distortion; (6) Behavioral activation (7) Specific training for anxiety; (8) Practice and feedback; (9) Relapse prevention; (10) Review.
|
|
No Intervention: Treatment as usual (TAU) group
Patients in TAU group received optimal medical care according to the current clinical guidelines.
Patients in the TAU group did not receive any psychotherapy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline score of The 12-item Health Survey Short Form (SF-12) at 10 weeks and 6 months
Time Frame: Both groups were assessed the SF-12 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
SF-12 is a 12-item, multipurpose short-form survey that is used to measure generic HRQoL (derived from the SF-36).
The findings are weighted and summed to produce interpretable scales for a participant's physical and mental well-being.
SF-12 is divided into two domains: the physical component summary (PCS) and the mental component summary (MCS).
Each domain scores from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a better health status
|
Both groups were assessed the SF-12 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ)
Time Frame: Both groups were assessed the BIPQ three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
The Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ) is a nine-item questionnaire that assesses how people feel about illnesses across nine categories.
The individual nine domain scores were added together to create a composite BIPQ score.
A higher BIPQ score suggests that the psychological burden of illness is greater (range: 0-80).
The BIPQ assesses the following illness perception domains: identity (symptoms experienced); timeline-acute/chronic (perception of the length of disease); consequences (effect of disease on one's life); personal control (control over disease); treatment control (perception of treatment impact); emotional representations (emotional effect of the disease); illness coherence (understanding of disease); illness concern (concern about the disease); and cause (perceived cause of disease).
The cause item is an open-ended question that asks patients to rank the top three factors they believe caused their disease
|
Both groups were assessed the BIPQ three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
|
University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS)
Time Frame: Both groups were assessed the AFSS symptoms subscale three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS)-a 14-item disease-specific scale consisting of three parts.
Part 1 measures patients with atrial fibrillation overall life satisfaction and frequency, duration of atrial fibrillation attacks, and severity; Part 2 measures patient utilization rates; Part 3 is divided into symptom subscales, including 7 common symptoms of atrial fibrillation (heart palpitations, dyspnea at rest, dyspnea with activity, exercise intolerance, vertigo, fatigue at rest, and chest pain) and the corresponding frequency of attacks.
In this study, the symptom part was selected as the AF symptoms measurement.
|
Both groups were assessed the AFSS symptoms subscale three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
|
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Both groups were assessed the GAD-7 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD- 7) is a 7-item measure of anxiety symptoms, using a four-point Likert-type scale.
The GAD-7 asks how often people have suffered from the seven core symptoms of GAD within the last two weeks with the response options being 'not at all', 'on some days', 'on more than half of the days', and 'almost every day' (scored 0-3, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21).
A sum score of≥10 indicates clinically relevant anxiety.
|
Both groups were assessed the GAD-7 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Both groups were assessed the PHQ-9 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a nine-item tool used to measure the severity of depression over the previous 2 weeks (range 0-27). he PHQ-9 was chosen above other depression screening measures because it is easy to administer and outperforms the structured clinical interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV as the standard criterion.
|
Both groups were assessed the PHQ-9 three times, respectively at baseline, 10 weeks later and 6 month later
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Qu Shan, Peking University People's Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 5, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
June 8, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 8, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 5, 2023
Last Verified
June 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AF-CBT-HRQoL2020
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on CBT
-
University of MinnesotaCompletedCBT Decoupling | CBT Anxiety Reduction | CBT CombinedUnited States
-
Charles River AnalyticsNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Massachusetts General HospitalNot yet recruitingNO VAPE + 12 Weeks of Standard CBT | Sham NO VAPE + 12 Weeks Standard CBT
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); University of Miami; Northwestern... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
University of the Balearic IslandsHospital Son LlatzerUnknownSmoking Cessation | CBT | Hospitalized Smokers | MhealthSpain
-
i4HealthCompassionate Mind FoundationCompletedComparison of Internet-based CBT and CMTUnited States
-
Paris Nanterre UniversityCompletedSmoking Cessation | CBT | Engagement | Technology Acceptance ModelFrance
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaCompleted
-
University of OttawaCompleted
-
Palo Alto Veterans Institute for ResearchNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Active, not recruitingMobile Application-Based CBT Worksheet Collection | Paper-Based Worksheet CollectionUnited States
-
Mariane Bagatin BermudezUnknownCBT | Mental DisorderBrazil
Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy
-
University of ManitobaCompleted
-
Ontario Mental Health FoundationUnknown
-
University of ManitobaActive, not recruiting
-
University of BristolDiabetes UKCompleted
-
Ruhr University of BochumGerman Research Foundation; University of Oxford; University of SalzburgCompleted
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeCancer Research UKUnknownCancer | InsomniaUnited Kingdom
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeCompleted
-
University of ReginaSaskatchewan Centre for Patient-Oriented ResearchCompletedDepression | Insomnia | AnxietyCanada
-
University of NottinghamCompletedFrequent Utilisers of Urgent Medical Care Who Have High Health AnxietyUnited Kingdom