CSF Protein Markers as Prognostic Indicators of the Response to CSF Shunt in Normotensive Hydrocephalus

April 18, 2026 updated by: Vicente Vanaclocha, University of Valencia

Alterations of CSF Protein Markers as Prognostic Indicator of the Response to Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting in Chronic Hydrocephalus in Adults

In all published series of adult chronic hydrocephalus, there is a percentage between twenty and twenty-five percent of patients who present poor results after implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt,1-11 usually ventriculoperitoneal. The lumboperitoneal shunt is also used but much more rarely.

The diagnosis of this pathology is based on the clinical picture, neuroimaging studies (Evans index and corpus callosum angle), cerebrospinal fluid dynamics tests (Katzman test), and invasive intracranial pressure measurements. Despite all this diagnostic arsenal, there is a high percentage of patients (mentioned above) in which treatment by diversion of cerebrospinal fluid does not offer the expected results. Traditionally, this has been attributed to chronic adult hydrocephalus being associated with other types of dementia. This may be the case in some patients, and it would be important to predict which patients will not improve or who will improve poorly in the case of insertion of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Adult chronic hydrocephalus, also known as normal pressure hydrocephalus or normal pressure hydrocephalus, presents with the classic Hakim-Adams triad, gait ataxia or "magnetic gait", urinary incontinence, and dementia.

Most cases have an idiopathic origin and constitute the only potentially reversible cause of dementia with surgical treatment (using a system for shunting the cerebrospinal fluid or CSF from the lateral ventricles or the thecal sac to the peritoneal cavity or right atrium ), so it is especially important to diagnose and treat it properly.

The prevalence of this pathology is increasing in line with the increase in the life expectancy of the population.

The diagnosis of this pathology is based on the clinical features, neuroimaging studies (CT and Magnetic Resonance), cerebrospinal fluid dynamics tests (Katzman test), cerebrospinal fluid drainage by lumbar puncture or using lumbar drainage for hours, and invasive measurements of Intracranial Pressure (ICP). Continuous monitoring of Intracranial Pressure with the patient admitted for 3-5 days (continuously night and day) is the most sensitive and specific diagnostic method for this disease, but it also has its false positives and negatives. Likewise, even though complications are very infrequent, it is an invasive technique that requires prolonged and continuous recordings to assess hydrodynamic changes.

Unfortunately, and despite all the diagnostic arsenal, the results of treatment using cerebrospinal fluid shunts (lumboperitoneal or ventriculoperitoneal), even in the best series, yield 20-25% poor results. These poor results have been attributed to many factors, including associated cerebral vascular disease problems, coexisting dementia not always well diagnosed, and Parkinson's disease.

On the other hand, the incorrect indication of a shunt can lead to unnecessary complications, potential morbidity and mortality (subdural hematomas, infections, etc.), and the low success rates mentioned above. Therefore, it is necessary to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of these patients as much as possible.

In an attempt to improve the diagnostic arsenal and, above all, try to predict which patients will improve and in which areas (cognitive, motor, or sphincter control), some researchers have studied the levels of certain proteins or peptides. in the cerebrospinal fluid obtained by a lumbar or ventricular puncture to try to find some kind of correlation between the levels of these protein markers and the type of dementia (Alzheimer's, for example, or adult chronic hydrocephalus) and the response to be expected with the implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt. The markers have been highly varied (amyloid β1-42, amyloid β1-40, T-tau, phospho-tau, neurofilament light chain protein, neurogranin, monocyte chemoattractant protein), and not all of them are available to all hospitals. In our environment, we have the determination in cerebrospinal fluid of the Aβ1-42 amyloid, phospho-tau, and h-tau proteins, which are the most widely used internationally. The purpose of this study is to try to see if there is a correlation between the levels of cerebrospinal fluid obtained by lumbar puncture during the practice of the Katzman test and the results of the implantation of a cerebrospinal fluid shunt and to try to find out which marker is related to which the improvement of each of the three symptoms that afflict patients with adult chronic hydrocephalus, that is, cognitive impairment, gait problems, and inadequate sphincter control.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Valencia
      • Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46015
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital General Universitario de Valencia
        • Contact:
      • Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46015
        • Recruiting
        • Vicente Vanaclocha
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study sample will be made up only of patients who meet the suspected diagnosis of adult chronic hydrocephalus, who are the ones who are going to have the valve implanted and followed up over time. In addition, the sample will be extracted with the biomarkers. The presence or absence of these biomarkers and their levels will be correlated with the clinical evolution of the patients so that these biomarkers could be used as prognostic indicators or to early identify those subjects in whom the cause of the symptoms was not really hydrocephalus but incipient dementia of another type (or other pathology).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Minimum age of 18 years, there is no maximum age, especially if it is understood that this pathology is more frequent as one advance in age, especially among males; pathology compatible with chronic adult hydrocephalus

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All patients whose suspected diagnosis is not adult chronic hydrocephalus will be excluded, specifically those with cerebrovascular disease, dementia not due to adult chronic hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and hereditary degenerative brain pathology. Huntington's chorea

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between CSF Amyloid β1-42 Level and Shunt Response
Time Frame: 1 year

Correlation between lumbar CSF Amyloid β1-42 concentration and clinical outcome following CSF shunting.

Unit of Measure: pg/mL

1 year
Correlation Between CSF Total Tau (h-tau) Level and Shunt Response
Time Frame: 1 year

Correlation between lumbar CSF total tau concentration and clinical outcome following CSF shunting.

Unit of Measure: pg/mL

1 year
Correlation Between CSF Phospho-Tau Level and Shunt Response
Time Frame: 1 year

Correlation between lumbar CSF phospho-tau concentration and clinical outcome following CSF shunting.

Unit of Measure: pg/mL

1 year
Threshold Levels of CSF Biomarkers Associated With Poor Shunt Response
Time Frame: 1 year

Identification of cutoff values of CSF β1-42 amyloid, total tau, and phospho-tau associated with poor clinical response after CSF shunting.

Unit of Measure: pg/mL

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 17, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Publish data once the study is finished

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe