PENG Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

July 5, 2023 updated by: Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Periarticular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Postoperative Rehabilitation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial seeks to evaluate the efficacy of the pericapsular nerve group block on postoperative rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The pericapsular nerve group, or PENG block, has been recently described and shows promise in providing analgesia to the hip joint. However, the effect of this block on postoperative rehabilitation is uncertain. This study compares a preoperative PENG block to a placebo before total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. The primary outcome measure is verticalization, walking distance, ability to go out of bed, active lifting of the limb, range of motion in the hip joint, bending range of motion, and abduction range of motion. The secondary measure is postoperative pain assessment during rehabilitation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

556

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wielkopolska
      • Poznań, Wielkopolska, Poland, 61-701
        • Poznan Univesity of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients > 18 years old undergoing unilateral total hip arthroplasty

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to participate
  • < 18 yo
  • Chronic opioid use
  • localized infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PENG with 20mL 0,5% Ropivacaine
Patients will receive a preoperative ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Using appropriate sterile precautions and procedural sedation with up to 2 mg IV midazolam, an ultrasound (Mindrey TE9) equipped with either a linear 15-6 megahertz (MHz) or a curvilinear 5-2 MHz transducer (habitus-dependent) used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, iliopubic eminence, and psoas muscle. After spinal anesthesia, a 22g 80 mm echogenic block needle (Stimuplex Ultra 360) is advanced lateral to medial, in the plane with the ultrasound beam, beneath the psoas tendon to the iliopubic eminence. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine is injected beneath the psoas tendon and above the iliopubic eminence in 5 mL increments with a periodic aspiration to prevent intravascular injection. The needle is withdrawn, and the needle entry site is wiped clean.
20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine will be injected for the PENG block
Other Names:
  • Ropimol
Experimental: PENG block with 20mL 0,9% normal saline
Patients will receive a preoperative ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block with 20 mL of 0.9% normal saline. Using appropriate sterile precautions and procedural sedation with up to 2 mg IV midazolam, an ultrasound (Mindrey TE9) equipped with either a linear 15-6 megahertz (MHz) or a curvilinear 5-2 MHz transducer (habitus-dependent) used to identify the anterior inferior iliac spine, iliopubic eminence, and psoas muscle. After spinal anesthesia, a 22g 80 mm echogenic block needle (Stimuplex Ultra 360) is advanced lateral to medial, in the plane with the ultrasound beam, beneath the psoas tendon to the iliopubic eminence. 20 mL 0.9% normal saline is injected beneath the psoas tendon and above the iliopubic eminence in 5 mL increments with a periodic aspiration to prevent intravascular injection. The needle is withdrawn, and the needle entry site is wiped clean.
20 mL 0.9% normal saline will be injected for the PENG block
Other Names:
  • placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale in motion
Time Frame: Day 2
Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 2
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale in motion
Time Frame: Day 3
Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 3
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale in motion
Time Frame: Day 4
Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total opioid consumption
Time Frame: 96 hours postoperatively
milligrams of intravenous morphine equivalents
96 hours postoperatively
Time to first opioid
Time Frame: 96 hours postoperatively
Hours to first administration of an intravenous opioid drug
96 hours postoperatively
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale et rest
Time Frame: Day 1
representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 1
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale et rest
Time Frame: Day 2
representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 2
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale et rest
Time Frame: Day 3
representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 3
postoperative Numeric Pain Rating Scale et rest
Time Frame: Day 4
representing one pain extreme (e.g. "no pain") to '10' representing the other pain extreme (e.g. "pain as bad as you can imagine" or "worst pain imaginable")
Day 4
Functional assessment: getting out of bed without help
Time Frame: First day after surgery
Binary assessment of motor function evaluated at the first day after surgical procedure
First day after surgery
Functional assessment: active elevation of the operated limb
Time Frame: First day after surgery
Binary assessment of motor function evaluated at the first day after surgical procedure
First day after surgery
Functional assessment: independent verticalization- by the balcony
Time Frame: First day after surgery
Binary assessment of motor function evaluated at the first day after surgical procedure
First day after surgery
Functional assessment: walking by the balcony
Time Frame: First day after surgery
Binary assessment of motor function evaluated at the first day after surgical procedure
First day after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Małgorzata Domagalska, PhD, Department of Palliative Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
  • Study Chair: Zbigniew Żaba, PhD, Department of Emergency Medicine Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

December 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Pain Chronic

Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine 0.5% Injectable Solution

Subscribe