Evaluation of Pain Levels by Quantitative Pupillometry During the Placement of Deep Venous Catheters in Sedated Patients in Intensive Care Unit (PUPICAT) (PUPICAT)

February 5, 2024 updated by: Ambre Sauvage, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Tours

Evaluation of Pain Levels by Quantitative Pupillometry During the Placement of Deep Venous Catheters in Sedated Patients in Intensive Care Unit

Pain is common in intensive care and gives rise to multiple consequences that can impact the future of patients. The placement of deep venous catheters are painful gestures of common practice in intensive care. However, some patients are ventilated and sedated and their level of pain is difficult to judge. Quantitative pupillometry seems to be a reliable tool for assessing pain in these patients unable to communicate. The method is already common practice in the operating room for this indication and recent studies increasingly validate its use in intensive care.

The aim of the study is to validate the different levels of pain that can be assessed by pupillometry within this population during catheterization and to identify any non-responding subgroups (in order to conduct future clinical trials evaluating pain therapies).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Three groups of patients will be studied : with aminergic drugs / with curare / without aminergic drugs nor curare.

The measurement of pain levels by quantitative pupillometry (NPi®-200 pupillometer, NeurOptics® USA) will be made in intubated, sedated patients, unable to communicate on their level of pain during the placement of a deep venous catheter.

Pain will be evaluated before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter.

Simultaneously, RASS and BPS scores as well as the patient's vital parameters and the cumulative doses of sedation-analgesia, curare and aminergic drugs will be collected.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Orléans, France, 45000
      • Tours, France, 37000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted in ICU, sedated, intubated, unable to communicate their levels of pain and requiring the placement of a deep venous catheter

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged over 18 hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit
  • Requiring the placement of a deep venous catheter (central venous catheter or dialysis catheter)
  • Sedated, intubated, unable to communicate about pain
  • No opposition to participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any ophthalmological pathology (lesion of the orbital cavity, edematous soft tissue or with an open lesion)
  • Any intracranial pathology (stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, tumour, etc.)
  • Patient post-cardio-respiratory arrest within the first 48 hours
  • Medicines interfering with the pupillary reflex: clonidine dexmedetomidine, droperidol, metoclopramide, nitric oxide, scopolamine, atropine
  • Patient protected within the law
  • Previous participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Amines
Sedated and intubated patients requiring a deep venous catheter, unable to communicate their level of pain, and treated with aminergic drugs (no curare) Assessment of pain levels by pupillometry during the placement of the deep venous catheter
Measurement of pain levels by pupillometry during the insertion of a deep venous catheter
Curares
Sedated and intubated patients requiring a deep venous catheter, unable to communicate their level of pain, and treated with curares (no aminergic drug) Assessment of pain levels by pupillometry during the placement of the deep venous catheter
Measurement of pain levels by pupillometry during the insertion of a deep venous catheter
Sedation alone
Sedated and intubated patients requiring a deep venous catheter, unable to communicate their level of pain, without any aminergic drug nor curare Assessment of pain levels by pupillometry during the placement of the deep venous catheter
Measurement of pain levels by pupillometry during the insertion of a deep venous catheter

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in variation of pupillary diameter by quantitative pupillometry
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Pupillary variation (%) = [maximum pupil diameter (mm) - minimum pupil diameter (mm)] / maximum pupil diameter (mm)]
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in pupillary reflex latency by quantitative pupillometry
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Latency of pupillary reflex in seconds
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in pupil constriction by quantitative pupillometry
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Pupil constriction speed in mm/s
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in pupil dilatation by quantitative pupillometry
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Pupil dilation speed in mm/s
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in NPi by quantitative pupillometry
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Neurological Pupil Index (NPi), from 0 to 4.9, higher scores meaning a better outcome (normal pupillary light reflex)
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in BPS scores
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Behavioural Pain Scale scores : from 3 to 12, higher scores meaning a worse outcome (more pain)
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in respiratory rate
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Respiratory rate (cycles per minute)
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in heart rate
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Heart rate (beats per minute)
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Changes in blood pressure
Time Frame: During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)
Blood pressure (mmHg)
During the insertion of the deep venous catheter : before starting the placement of the catheter, at puncture(s), at dilation(s), and during the suture of the catheter (through study completion : an average of 20 minutes)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DR230092
  • 2023-A00712-43 (Other Identifier: IdRCB)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe