Optical Coherence Tomography and Microperimetry Biomarker Evaluation in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Study (OMEGA)

This study is a biomarker evaluation study in patients with geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The study evaluates microperimetry (fundus-controlled perimetry) and optical coherence tomography imaging for assessing changes in retinal sensitivity and anatomy over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The optical coherence tomography (OCT) and microperimetry biomarker evaluation in patients with GA (OMEGA) study aims to systematically compare a panel of established and novel visual function and structural outcome measures for monitoring GA progression. This prospective, natural-history study was performed at a tertiary referral center (University Hospital Basel, PI: Prof. Dr. med. Hendrik P.N. Scholl). The study included a baseline visit and follow-up visits at weeks 12, 24, and 48.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Basel-Stadt
      • Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland, CH-4031
        • University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with manifest geographic atrophy (total GA lesion size >1.2 mm2) secondary to age-related macular degeneration

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with ICH-GCP and local legislation prior to admission to the study
  2. Age >60 years
  3. Ability (including a sufficient general health status according to investigators judgement) and willingness to undertake all scheduled visits and assessments including predefined methodology and standards utilizing microperimetry
  4. GA secondary to AMD with no evidence of prior or active choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in the study eye
  5. GA lesion in the study eye must reside completely within the FAF imaging field (Field 2-30 degree image centered on the fovea)
  6. BCVA of 20/63 or better (Snellen equivalent) using ETDRS charts at starting distance of 4 m in the study eye
  7. Well demarcated area(s) of GA secondary to AMD with no evidence of prior or active CNV in the study eye. The total GA lesion size >1.2 mm2 (approximately >0.5 disc area [DA]) and <17.78 mm2 (approximately <7 DA) and must reside completely within the FAF imaging field (Field 2, i.e., 30 degree image centered on the fovea). If GA is multifocal, at least 1 focal lesion must be >1.2 mm2 (approximately >0.5 DA).
  8. Sufficiently clear ocular media, adequate pupillary dilation, and fixation to permit quality fundus imaging in the study eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. GA in either eye due to causes other than AMD (for example, monogenetic macular dystrophies [e.g., Stargardt disease, cone rod dystrophy] or toxic maculopathies [e.g., chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine maculopathy])
  2. Receiving active treatment in any studies of investigational drugs for GA/dry AMD in the study eye
  3. Mean sensitivity difference > 3 dB between the two microperimetry examinations in the screening visit.
  4. History of vitrectomy surgery, submacular surgery, or other surgical intervention for AMD in the study eye
  5. Previous laser photocoagulation for CNV, diabetic macular edema, retinal vein occlusion, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy in the study eye
  6. Prior treatment with Visudyne, external-beam radiation therapy, or transpupillary thermotherapy in the study eye
  7. History of prophylactic subthreshold laser treatment for AMD in the study eye
  8. Previous intravitreal drug delivery in the study eye (e.g., intravitreal corticosteroid injection, anti-angiogenic drugs, anti complement agents, or device implantation). A single intraoperative administration of a corticosteroid during cataract surgery for cystoid macular edema prophylaxis at least 3 months prior to screening is permitted.
  9. RPE tear that involves the macula in either eye
  10. Any concurrent ocular or intraocular condition in the study eye (e.g., cataract or diabetic retinopathy) that, in the opinion of the investigator, could do either of the following:

    • Require medical or surgical intervention during the study period to prevent or treat vision loss that might result from that condition
    • If allowed to progress untreated, could likely contribute to loss of at least two Snellen equivalent lines of BCVA during the study period
  11. Previous violation of the posterior capsule in the study eye unless it occurred as a result of Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy in association with prior posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in retinal sensitivity in the junctional zone
Time Frame: Week 12
Change from baseline in retinal sensitivity in the junctional zone and in the perilesional zone of the largest atrophic loci as assessed by microperimetry
Week 12
Change in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) thickness in the junctional zone
Time Frame: Week 12
Change from baseline in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) layer thickness in the junctional zone and in the perilesional zone measured by OCT
Week 12
Change in photoreceptor thickness in the junctional zone
Time Frame: Week 12
Change from baseline in photoreceptor layer thickness in the junctional zone and in the perilesional zone measured by OCT
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 23, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on Natural history study

3
Subscribe