Clinical Effectiveness of Damon Ultima Vs Conventional Brackets Trial)

January 10, 2024 updated by: Nawar Ahmed Abed, University of Baghdad

Clinical Effectiveness of Damon Ultima Vs Conventional Brackets (A Randomized Clinical Trial)

Compare the clinical performance, root resorption and pain perception between passive self-ligating Damon Ultema vs conventional brackets.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Damon Ultima System was introduced and claimed to be the first true full expression orthodontic system designed for faster and more precise finishing. The brackets were completely reengineered to virtually eliminate play for precise control of rotation, angulation and torque. Moreover, the system used specially designed archwires regarding wire dimensions and shape to fulfill the manufacturers claim.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Dheaa H Al-Groosh, PHD
  • Phone Number: Iraq /Baghdad 07737776503
  • Email: dheaaha73@yahoo.com

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 15-35 years of age patients who are healthy and without medications such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics.
  • Patients with Class I normal occlusion with moderate dental irregularity (with 4-6 irregularity index) requiring non-extraction treatment.
  • Presence of all the permanent teeth apart from the third molars.
  • Patients with good oral hygiene and periodontal health.
  • Without previous orthodontic treatment/ functional appliances

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded from recruitment if he had sever skeletal discrepancy that requires orthognathic surgery.

• Patients who have cleft lip or palate, hypodontia, or hyperdontia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Damon Ultima brackets
It is metal twin bracket with their recommended arch wire
Other Names:
  • conventional Roth appliance
Experimental: conventional Roth appliance
It is metal twin bracket with their recommended arch wire
Other Names:
  • conventional Roth appliance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Occlusal outcomes assessment
Time Frame: 1 year

1. Alignment, 2. Marginal ridge height, 3. Buccolingual inclination, 4. Overjet, 5. Occlusal contacts, 6. Occlusal relationships, 7. Interproximal contacts (1-7) Component: scores < 0.5 = 0. 0.5 to 1 mm =1. > 1 mm = 2. 8. Root angulation: Root parallelism = 0. Roots are not parallel = 1. Contacting adjacent tooth = 2. High scores on individual segments, or combinations of individual segments, may cause a case to become Incomplete.

SO:

the minimum value = 0 the maximum value = 16 the high score means = worse outcome the low score means = better outcome

1 year
Little Irregularity index:
Time Frame: 6 months

This technique involves measuring the linear distance from anatomic contact point to the adjacent anatomic contact point of the mandibular anterior teeth , used to assess the changes in dental alignment throughout the study.

initial irregularity index is (3 mm to 7mm) = worse out come and the final irregularity index is zero mm= best out come

6 months
Arch parameter measurement:
Time Frame: 1 year
Arch length, arch width will be measured in millimeters and shape will be assessed by change from narrow shape arch to wide shape arch
1 year
Root alingment
Time Frame: 1 year
Root movement in 3 plane of space will be evaluated at the end of the alignment phase after insertion of stainless steel wire which may will Tacke about 6 months and at the end of the treatment after about 6 months using CBCT. The inclination of upper and lower teeth will be assessed
1 year
Root resorption
Time Frame: 1 year
Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption OIIRR will be assessed and the prevalence of root resorption will be calculated using CBCT radiographs.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient experience and satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 year

The pain perception will be assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) immediately after wire insertion, at 4, 24 hours, 3 days, 7 days, and immediately after each monthly visit (0 no pain, 3 simple pain, 100 very sever pain).

Pain sensitivity questionnaire (PSQ) will be used to assess the patient reliability to pain. This will be done using the Arabic version of PSQ (The patient answer no or yes)

1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dheaa H Al-Groosh, PHD, University of Baghdad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Damon Ultima brack treatment

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

randomized clinical trial

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Skeletal and Dental CL I Malocclusion Moderate Crowding

Clinical Trials on Damon Ultima bracket

Subscribe