Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise - GRADE

July 24, 2025 updated by: Allen MY Cheong, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

The GRADE Randomized Trial: Glaucoma Rehabilitation With Action viDeo Games and Exercise

Falls are one of the most serious public health concerns for seniors, with significant medical and economic consequences. This concern is even higher in patients with peripheral field loss due to glaucoma because of the patients' compromised visual input. The investigators' project proposes an innovative, entertaining, easily accessible and enjoyable intervention for improving mobility and postural control function in glaucoma patients with peripheral vision loss, who are more prone to falls and suffer from fear of falling. The new intervention examined in this project can be implemented in current vision and balance rehabilitation programs, and may benefit patients with different types of visual impairment to minimize their risk of falls and improve their quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A prospective, 2-arm, randomized, single-blind, active-control trial will enroll 56 moderately- to severely-affected glaucoma patients with stable peripheral field loss, intact cognitive function, and no history of balance training. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to one of two groups: 1) standing, physically interactive action video-game training (AVG_PI); and 2) conventional physical training (PT). AVG using a Nintendo Switch gaming station will be administered in 20 sessions over 10 weeks (45 minutes per session, 2 sessions per week). Participants in the AVG_PI will be in standing position with game controllers or sensors attached to the body while playing games involving muscle stretching and strengthening exercises. Participants in the PT will receive 45-minutes conventional physical training. Outcome measures will be assessed before training, and after 10 and 20 training sessions. The primary outcome measure is a test of mobility, and the secondary outcome measures include tests for dynamic balance plus visual cognition, static balance, visual cognition, and patient reported outcomes for fear of falling and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 000000
        • Recruiting
        • The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of moderate to severe bilateral glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) from primary open-angle (including normal tension) or angle-closure glaucoma, as determined by an ophthalmologist, with abnormal Glaucoma Hemifield Test on standard Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 testing and matching nerve-fiber layer thinning on optical coherence tomography;
  2. Stable vision and visual field loss for at least 3 months;
  3. With a best-corrected distance acuity of 6/12 or better (equivalent to 0.3 logMAR acuity or better to confirm that participant's central vision is preserved);
  4. With a cognitive functional score of 22 or above in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment - Hong Kong version (to confirm participants' intact cognitive function).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Advanced glaucoma with GON of median deviation worse than -25 decibel;
  2. Ocular diseases other than glaucoma (e.g., age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and moderate to severe cataract);
  3. Severe medical problems (e.g., stroke, Parkinson's disease) or self-reported neurological (e.g. brain surgery, brain tumor and peripheral neuropathy), or cognitive disorders (e.g., diagnosed dementia or cognitive impairment);
  4. Physical impairments (e.g. need the use of orthopedic and mobility aids) or physical limitations restricting them from independent walking;
  5. Self-reported or medically diagnosed vestibular/ cerebellar dysfunction, history of vertigo, or severe hearing loss;
  6. Using any medications for any neurological conditions or psychiatric drugs (e.g. sedative, hypnotic) that might interfere motor control; and
  7. Currently attending any intensive physical/balance training.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interactive action video-game training (AVG)
AVG using a Nintendo Switch gaming station will be administered in 20 sessions over 10 weeks (45 minutes per session, 2 sessions per week). Participants will be in standing position with game controllers or sensors attached to the body while playing games involving muscle stretching and strengthening exercises.
20 sessions of AVG over 10 weeks (45 minutes per session, 2 sessions per week)
Experimental: Conventional physical training (PT)
Participants in the PT will receive 45-minutes conventional physical training.
20 sessions of physical training over 10 weeks (45 minutes per session, 2 sessions per week)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Measure - Time Up and Go test combining Narrow path walking test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Time Up and Go test combining Narrow path walking test: All participants need to stand up from a 46 cm height chair, walk on the path at their usual pace until the strip of a non-reflective tape, cross over the tape, turn 180°, walk to the starting position and finally sit down. Then repeat the same procedure within a narrower width. Participants need to use the dominant leg to step onto the standing position on one force plate while the non-dominant leg stands on the other force plate.

The test will repeat for 10 times. Participants' gait parameters including hip flexion/extension (degree), knee Min/Max (degree), ankle flexion/extension (degree), walking speed (mm/s), step width (mm), and step length(mm) will be measured and analyzed for each condition.

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Static Balance Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Static Balance: Participants will be asked to stand on a force place with a foam while performing visual searching. Parameters including maximum antero-posterior amplitude (mm), maximum medio-lateral amplitude (mm), total sway path (mm), and root mean square sway (mm/s) will be analyzed.

Each test would be repeated for 3 times.

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.
Perturbed Balance Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Perturbed Balance: Participants will be asked to stand on a force place which will translate forward or backward while performing visual searching. Parameters including latency (ms) reacting to the perturbation, maximum antero-posterior amplitude (mm), maximum medio-lateral amplitude (mm), total sway path (mm), and root mean square sway (mm/s) will be analyzed.

Each test would be repeated for 3 times.

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.
Useful field of view (UFOV)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Visual attention will be examined by Useful Field of View (UFOV). Participants will be asked to complete the following 3 tasks.

  1. Processing speed: Participants will be asked to discriminate the central presented stimulus as a target or distractor.
  2. Divided attention: In addition to discriminating the central target, participants are required to identify the location of the peripheral target.
  3. Selective attention: Procedure is similar as "Divided attention". Participants are required to identify the location of peripheral target among the distractors.

Parameter includes time to reach threshold(ms)

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.
Reaction time (RT)
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Each participant is asked to complete the following task using a customized computer programme.

Reaction Time Test: Participants will be asked to respond as fast as possible when the same stimulus (an 'x' emerging in a square in the middle of the screen) was presented.

This test will be repeated for 3 blocks with 46 trials per block. Parameter includes reaction time to correct answer(ms).

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.
Cognitive Reflection Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Each participant is asked to complete the following task using a customized computer programme.

Cognitive Reflection Test: Participants will be presented with four squares horizontally on the screen. They will be asked to react to an 'x' emerging in one of the squares (40 trials in total) by pressing a corresponding key on a keyboard-'1', '2', '3', or '4' which present the position of 'x' . Parameter includes reaction time to correct answer(ms).

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.
Quality of Life Questionnaire measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

The effect of intervention on quality of life will be evaluated using the Learning Vector Quantization (LvQ) Scale.

In the LvQ, participants will be asked to rate how much their eyesight has interfered with each of 24 activities in the past month. The completion results in a summed score between 0 (a low quality of life) and 125 (a high quality of life).

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.
Fear of Falling Questionnaire measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

The effect of intervention on fear of falling will be evaluated using the Chinese versions of Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I).

In the FES-I, participants will be asked "how concerned they are about the possibility of falling" for each of the 16 social and physical activities. The completion results in a summed score between minimum 16 (no concern about falling) to maximum 64 (severe concern about falling).

Change from baseline at week 5 and change from baseline at week 10.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Allen Cheong, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 24, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD that underlie results in a publication will be available upon reasonable request to the research team.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be available no later than 6 months following publication and for 1 year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD will be shared with investigators who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Action video game training

Subscribe