The Sedentary to Active Rising to Thrive (START) Trial (START)

The Sedentary to Active Rising to Thrive (START) Trial: A Proof-of-Concept Sedentary Behavior Reduction Program

The goal of this behavioral clinical trial is to compare two different ways of becoming less sedentary and more active in 60 older adults at elevated risk of becoming frail.

The main question this project aims to answer are whether participants in each intervention are able to gradually replace 30 minutes of sedentary (sitting-like) behavior with very light walking over 60 days.

There are other questions this project aims to answer that include:

  1. whether it is easier to replace sedentary behavior with one 30-minute walking bout or three 10-minute walking bouts
  2. whether becoming less sedentary and more active leads to feeling better, have less stress, pain, and fatigue and have more confidence in becoming more regularly active
  3. whether becoming less sedentary and more active leads to better regulation of inflammation and metabolism

Participants will be randomized into one of two sedentary reduction behavior programs; one program that gradually replaces sedentary time with one 30-minute walking bout and the other program that gradually replaces sedentary time with three 10-minute walking bouts in the morning, afternoon, and evening. Researchers will compare both programs to see which one is easier to achieve and maintain over 60 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Initiating and maintaining habitual physical activity is difficult for sedentary older adults, particularly those encumbered by health challenges. The 2018 US Physical Activity Guidelines recommends that all adults perform ≥150 minutes/week of physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviors. Yet, traditional approaches to increase physical activity do little to address sedentary behavior reduction, especially for older adults. Lower sedentary behavior is associated with improved biological and psychosocial health-independent of meeting physical activity guidelines. Thus, there remains a critical need to implement and evaluate a structured way to reduce sedentary behavior as a potential pathway for habitual physical activity engagement.

This project aims to test two prescribe-able and feasible strategies to initiate and incorporate sedentary behavior reduction into daily lifestyle with remote monitoring. The interventions are an inexpensive and low burden approach to reduce sedentary behavior and promote habitual physical activity. Moreover, accelerometer-based outcomes of sedentary behavior are novel in intervention settings, particularly when measured in free-living, real-world settings. Lastly, this project directly addresses a gap of successful remotely deployable interventions geared to initiate and build activity into daily life by replacing sedentary time among older adults.

Aim 1. Explore the effectiveness of 2 interventions to reduce sedentary time in pre-frail older adults over 2 months

Hypothesis 1a. Each intervention will reduce objectively measured daily sedentary time from baseline levels over 2 months.

Hypothesis 1b. The continuous intervention will result in more reduction of objectively measured sedentary time than the bouts intervention.

Aim 2. Explore the dose-response relationship between sedentary time changes and patient-reported outcomes that include fatigue, fatigability, anxiety, general and exercise-based self-efficacy, stress, pain, and mood over 2 months

Hypothesis 2: Decreased daily sedentary time over 2 months is associated with decreased fatigue, fatigability, anxiety, stress, and pain, and increased general and exercise-based self-efficacy and mood over 2 months.

Aim 3. Explore the dose-response relationship between sedentary time changes and biomarkers of frailty-related inflammation, including serum interleukin (IL-6) (pg/mL) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -alpha receptor 1 (pg/mL) over 2 months

Hypothesis 3. Decreased daily sedentary time is associated with decreased serum (IL-6) and TNF-alpha receptor 1 over 2 months.

Aim 4. Explore the dose-response relationship between changes in sedentary time with biomarkers of glucose and lipid metabolism (glucose, insulin, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC)), a cytokine marker related to frailty (Growth/Differentiation Factor-15; (GDF-15), hemoglobin A1C (hbA1c), non-esterified free fatty acid, and untargeted metabolomics-based markers of energy regulation.

Hypothesis 4. Decreased daily sedentary time is associated with decreased levels of blood glucose, insulin, TC, LDLC, triglycerides and increased HDLC, decreased GDF-15, decreased hbA1c, decreased non-esterified free fatty acid, and lower circulating metabolites necessary for energy regulation over 2 months.

Aim 5. Explore the dose-response and diurnal relationships between changes in sedentary time and interstitial glucose continuously monitored over 24 hours for 14 consecutive days using a Libre Pro sensor at baseline and 2 months later

Hypothesis 5. Decreased sedentary time is associated with decreased overall glucose and different time-of-day glucose levels, coefficient of variation, % of time in glucose at various ranges (e.g., ≥200, ≥180, ≥140, 70-180, 70-140, <70, <54 mg/dL), mean daily difference, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion) over 2 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21207
        • Johns Hopkins ProHealth
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Bayview Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥65 years
  • Pre-frail defined as having 1-2 of the following criteria:
  • Self-reported unintentional weight loss
  • Self-reported fatigue
  • Self-reported low activity
  • Slowness measured during a 4-m walking test
  • Weakness measured with grip strength
  • Self-reported regular physical activity <20 minutes/day
  • Self-reported willingness to work up to walking for 30 minutes/day
  • Self-reported ability to find a place to walk for up to 30 minutes/day
  • Agree to all study procedures and assessments
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported diabetes
  • Self-reported problems related to alcohol or drugs
  • Self-reported inability to walk across a room
  • Self-reported use of a walker
  • Self-reported requirement of medical supervision when engaging in physical activity
  • Fallen >2 times in the past month
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Plan to move out of the area within 6 months
  • Inability to provide self-transportation to study assessment visits
  • Inability to complete a usual-paced 400m walking test within 15 minutes without sitting or the help of another
  • Uncontrolled resting hypertension (>160/90 mmHg)
  • Cognitive impairment determined using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Continuous sedentary reduction intervention
Structured intervention to progressively replace sedentary time with one daily 30-minute light-intensity walking bout

During Phase 1, one minute of sedentary time will be replaced with very light to light intensity walking at three different times during the day, every day for 10 days, reaching three separate 10-minute walking intervals (or bouts).

During Phase 2, the three 10-minute walking bouts will be gradually combined into one 30-minute bout over the course of 20 days.

Active Comparator: Bouted sedentary reduction intervention
Structured intervention to progressively replace sedentary time with three daily 10-minute light-intensity walking bouts

During Phase 1, one minute of sedentary time will be replaced with very light to light intensity walking at three different times during the day, every day for 10 days, reaching three separate 10-minute walking intervals (or bouts).

During Phase 2, the three 10-minute walking bouts will be maintained over the course of 20 days.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sedentary Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Sedentary time measured with a wrist worn monitor containing an accelerometer sensor

This measurement is collected under a 7-day/24-hour wear protocol at baseline and again 2 months afterwards to determine the change in sedentary time before and after either intervention.

Baseline, 2 months
Intervention Difference in the Change in Sedentary Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Comparing the 2-month change in sedentary time between the two interventions
Baseline, 2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Physical Activity Accumulation
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Physical activity fragmentation (e.g., broken up activity accumulation) wrist worn monitor containing an accelerometer sensor
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Walking Ability
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Ability to walk measured at a usual walking pace for 400m at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Walking Speed
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Walking speed measured at a usual walking pace for 4m at baseline and 2 months afterwards.
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Fatigue
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Fatigue measured using a Fatigue Scale questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-13 where higher scores mean higher fatigue.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Fatigability
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Fatigability measured using a Pittsburgh Fatigability questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-100 where higher scores mean higher fatigability.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Anxiety measured using an Anxiety Scale questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-20 where higher scores mean higher anxiety.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in General Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

General Self Efficacy measured using a General Self Efficacy questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-50 where higher scores mean higher general self efficacy.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Exercise-based Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Exercise-based Self Efficacy measured using an Exercise-based Self Efficacy questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-90 where higher scores mean higher exercise-based self efficacy.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Stress measured using a Perceived Stress Scale questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-70 where higher scores mean higher stress.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Pain
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Pain measured using a modified version of the McGill pain questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-5 where higher scores mean greater pain.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Mood
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months

Mood measured using a Profile of Mood Status questionnaire measured at baseline and 2 months afterwards.

On the questionnaire, a score can range from 0-20 where higher scores mean greater mood disturbance.

Baseline, 2 months
Change in Inflammation
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Inflammation measured from blood draws quantifying serum IL-6 (pg/mL) and TNF-alpha receptor 1 (pg/mL) at baseline and 2 months afterwards
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Blood Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Blood glucose measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Insulin
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Insulin measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Total Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Total cholesterol measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Triglycerides
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Triglycerides measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Growth/Differentiation Factor-15
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Growth/Differentiation Factor-15 measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Metabolites
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Untargeted metabolomics-based markers of energy regulation measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Hemoglobin A1c
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Hemoglobin A1c measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Non-Esterified Free Fatty Acid
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Non-Esterified Free Fatty Acid measured from blood draws
Baseline, 2 months
Change in Interstitial Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 months
Interstitial glucose measured using a continuous glucose monitor worn 24-hours each day for 14 consecutive days at baseline and 2 months afterwards. Specific measurements include overall glucose and different time-of-day glucose levels, coefficient of variation, % of time in glucose at various ranges (e.g., ≥200, ≥180, ≥140, 70-180, 70-140, <70, <54 mg/dL), mean daily difference, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursion).
Baseline, 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amal Wanigatunga, PhD, Johns Hopkins Blomberg School of Public Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 4, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00023391
  • K01AG076967 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on Continuous sedentary reduction intervention

Subscribe