Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Application in Peri-implantitis

September 13, 2023 updated by: Nazli Zeynep Alpaslan, Yuzuncu Yıl University

Evaluation of the Effect of Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) Laser Application on Peri-Implant Crevicular Fluid RANKL and OPG Levels in the Treatment of Peri-implantitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

In the present study, investigators, aimed to evaluate the effect of erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser application combined with mechanical debridement (MD) on clinical parameters and biochemical parameters such as receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) in patients with peri-implant diseases.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Peri-implantitis is a plaque-associated which involves the tissues around dental implants characterized by inflammation and progressive loss of the supporting alveolar bone. According to a meta-analysis and systematic review, the prevalence of peri-implantitis is about 22%. Biofilm, poor plaque control, and poor dental care after dental implant are implicated in the etiology of disease.

Surface decontamination of the implant is the cornerstone of peri-implantitis treatment. However, there is no sufficient evidence to demonstrate the superiority of a specific decontamination protocol in the literature. Nevertheless, a review recommended the potential use of laser-assisted procedures as an adjunct to mechanical instrumentation and implant detoxification in both non-surgical and regenerative interventions for the treatment of peri-implant diseases. Several studies have examined the role of a variety of laser types in both periodontal and peri-implant treatments and laser application has been shown to play a central role in wound healing and tissue regeneration.

Erbium lasers such as erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) use mid-infrared wavelengths which are highly absorbed by water and hydroxyapatite crystals and minerals. In a recent in vitro study, Er,Cr:YSGG laser has been shown to be a safe method in the treatment of peri-implantitis with the dual wavelength protocol. In the literature, there is a limited number of studies using Er,Cr:YSGG laser in the treatment of peri-implantitis in the in vivo setting. Although limited, favorable results have been described in a case report with 18-month follow-up, case reports of including 11 patients, and randomized-controlled clinical studies. Taken together, Er,Cr:YSGG laser seems to be an effective treatment modality in reducing clinical symptoms of peri-implantitis.

The detection of specific biomarkers in the peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) is promising to objectively evaluate peri-implant inflammation at baseline and assess treatment efficacy. Biomarkers are host response molecules which reflect a biological state and help to distinguish healthy from diseased tissues or to evaluate disease and its severity.

Recent discoveries regarding the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) receptor activator that induce and inhibit osteoclast differentiation have shown that both markers play a role in the molecular network of peri-implant bone resorption. The RANKL is a member of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily which interacts on osteoclastogenesis. It is secreted by osteoblasts, fibroblasts, and activated T cells and is associated with RANK as a surface-bound molecule which stimulates osteoclast activity. On the other hand, OPG is a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL and expressed by osteoblasts. It also inhibits the osteoclast differentiation and prevents the interaction between RANKL and RANK.

Previous studies have shown high RANKL levels in the crevicular fluid of patients with periodontitis and peri-implantitis compared to healthy dental sites. However, there are controversial results regarding OPG. Several studies have reported significantly higher OPG and RANK levels at peri-implant disease sites compared to healthy implant sites. In addition, significantly higher RANKL protein levels and significantly lower OPG protein levels have been reported in periodontitis tissue. In a study, the PICF level of soluble RANKL was not significantly correlated with clinical parameters and OPG. However, the authors found a positive correlation between the total OPG level and PICF volume, bleeding on probing (BoP) and gingival index (GI).

To the best of investigators' knowledge, there is no study investigating the effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser as an adjunct to mechanical debridement (MD) on RANKL and OPG in the treatment of peri-implantitis. In the present study, investigators, therefore aimed to evaluate the effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser application combined with MD on clinical parameters and biochemical parameters such as RANKL and OPG in patients with peri-implant diseases.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Van, Turkey
        • Nazli Zeynep Alpaslan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • bone loss as evidenced by X-ray and inflammatory symptoms in the soft tissue, bleeding and/or suppuration around the implant compatible with peri-implantitis (each patient had a single dental implant or the implant in the deepest pathological pocket not requiring surgical intervention was chosen in case of peri-implantitis in multiple implants);
  • radiotherapy or chemotherapy-naïve patients;
  • having no bone disease such as osteoporosis or osteopetrosis;
  • receiving no bisphosphonate therapy;
  • having functional prosthetic loading on the implant for at least six months
  • requiring no advanced surgical technique for the treatment of peri-implantitis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • having systemic diseases such as diabetes, autoimmune disorder, renal or hepatic impairment;
  • having uncontrolled periodontal disease in natural teeth existing in the mouth;
  • smoking habit;
  • having parafunctional habits which affect osseointegration of the dental implant;
  • receiving antibiotherapy three months before the diagnosis of peri-implantitis;
  • having non-osseointegrated dental implant;
  • pregnancy and lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Non-surgical mechanical therapy
Titanium curettes were used for non-surgical mechanical therapy in both groups under local anesthesia. The curette was gently inserted into the peri-implant pocket and the mechanical therapy was completed with threads felt. The control group received mechanical therapy alone.
Traditional non surgical mechanical therapy Mechanical instrumentation in all groups was made with titanium curettes.The curette was gently inserted into the peri-implant pocket and the mechanical therapy was completed with threads felt.
Active Comparator: Er, Cr: YSGG laser-assisted non-surgical mechanical therapy
Titanium curettes were used for non-surgical mechanical therapy in both groups under local anesthesia. The curette was gently inserted into the peri-implant pocket and the mechanical therapy was completed with threads felt. The laser group received mechanical therapy followed by Er;Cr;YSGG laser.
The laser group received mechanical therapy followed by Er;Cr;YSGG laser. Laser application was performed using the bottom-up technique. Therefore, the tip was retracted about 1 mm after it was placed on the bottom of the pocket and slowly moved in the coronal direction to the parallel to the implant surface.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) level (pg/mL)
Time Frame: 6 months
All PICF samples were collected before clinical measurements. During sample collection, the implants were isolated using cotton rolls and dried gently with an air freshener, and paper strips were advanced into the pocket until resistance was felt. The paper strips were kept in the peri-implant pocket for 30 sec. Paper strips were placed in 500-µL sterilized Eppendorf® tubes to which phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was added. All samples were kept at -40° until analysis. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure RANKL levels in the PICF samples in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
6 months
Osteoprotegerin (OPG) level (ng/mL)
Time Frame: 6 months
All PICF samples were collected before clinical measurements. During sample collection, the implants were isolated using cotton rolls and dried gently with an air freshener, and paper strips were advanced into the pocket until resistance was felt. The paper strips were kept in the peri-implant pocket for 30 sec. Paper strips were placed in 500-µL sterilized Eppendorf® tubes to which phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was added. All samples were kept at -40° until analysis. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure OPG levels in the PICF samples in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
6 months
Probing depth (mm)
Time Frame: 6 months
Probing depth (PD) (distance from peri-implant margin to peri-implant pocket base) was measured with a plastic probe in 4 regions (mesial, buccal, distal, lingual / palatial) of each implant and recorded as mm.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Plaque index score (0-3)
Time Frame: 6 months

Plaque index was measured from the 4 surfaces of each implant. The plaque index score of each implant was calculated with Silness-Loe plaque index by dividing the total value by 4.

0:absence of microbial plaque

  1. Thin film of microbial plaque along the free peri-implant margin
  2. moderate accumulation with plaque in the sulcus
  3. large amount of plaque in sulcus or pocket along the free peri-implant margin
6 months
Gingival index score (0-3)
Time Frame: 6 months

The gingival index was measured from the 4 surfaces of each implant. The gingival index score of each implant was calculated with Silness-Loe gingival index by dividing the total value by 4.

0:Normal gingiva

  1. Mild inflammation: slight change in color, slight oedema, no bleeding on probing
  2. Moderate inflammation: redness,oedema and glazing, bleeding on probing
  3. Severe inflammation: marked redness and oedema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding
6 months
Bleeding on probing (percentage)
Time Frame: 6 months
Bleeding on probing was measured from 4 surfaces of each implant. If there is bleeding after probing, it is recorded as +, if there is no bleeding it is recorded as _. Gingival bleeding index is calculated as a percentage of affected sites.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ahmet Cemil Talmac, PhD, Van Yüzüncü Yil University
  • Study Chair: Dicle Altindal, PhD, Van Yüzüncü Yil University
  • Study Chair: Abdullah Seckin Ertugrul, PhD, Izmir Katip Çelebi University
  • Principal Investigator: Nazli Zeynep Alpaslan, PhD, Van Yüzüncü Yil University
  • Study Chair: Damla Akbal, PhD, Private Dental Clinic
  • Study Chair: Serap Keskin Tunc, PhD, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 8, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis

Clinical Trials on Er, Cr: YSGG laser-assisted non-surgical mechanical therapy

Subscribe