Differentiating Between Brain Hemorrhage and Contrast

Artificial Intelligence for Differentiating Between Brain Hemorrhage and Contrast Extravasation After Mechanical Revascularization in Acute Ischemic Stroke

The goal of this observational study is to use artificial intelligence to differentiate cerebral hemorrhage from contrast agent extravasation after mechanical revascularization in ischemic stroke.

The main question it aims to answer is: Whether artificial intelligence can help differentiate brain hemorrhage from contrast agent extravasation.

Patients with intracranial high-density lesions on CT scans within 24h after mechanical revascularization will be included. Expected to enroll 500 patients. The type of high-density lesion is determined according to dual-energy CT images or follow-up images. Patients will be divided into training group, validation and testing groups by stratified random sampling (6:2:2). After the images and the image labels are obtained, deep learning artificial intelligence will be used to learn the image characteristics and establish a diagnostic model, and the model performance and generalization ability will be evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

From December 2017 to June 2023, patients with acute ischemic stroke or intracranial arterial stenosis who underwent mechanical vascularization at 10 centers will be retrospectively enrolled.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(1) patients underwent non-enhanced head CT after mechanical vascularization; (2) initial post-operative non-enhanced head CT was performed within 24 h after mechanical vascularization; and (3) intracranial hyper-intensity, which was defined as an objectively higher density than the surrounding grey or white matter in the parenchyma or higher density than cerebrospinal fluid in ventricles and cisterns, could be seen on the initial non-enhanced head CT after mechanical vascularization.

Exclusion Criteria:

(1) the follow-up time of non-enhanced head CT after mechanical vascularization was less than 24 h; (2) artifacts (e.g. metal artifacts or motion artifacts) affected the hyper-intensity in CT images; and (3) patients underwent craniotomy after mechanical vascularization, which made it difficult to identify the area of hyper-intensity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
hemorrhage
The result of the Intracranial hyper-density on CT images is determined by dual-energy CT or follow-up images: hyper-density can be seen on the virtual non-contrasted image of dual-energy CT, or high density persist longer than 48 hours.
simple contrast extravasation
There is no Intracranial hyper-density on the virtual non-contrast images of dual-energy CT, or the follow-up CT show that the hyper-density is absorbed within 48 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Develop a deep learning model to differentiate brain hemorrhage from contrast agent extravasation, and evaluate the model performance and generalization ability
Time Frame: 2024-12
The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and recall of the model will be calculated, and confusion matrix will be display.
2024-12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Subscribe