Alliance for Family Integrated Care Implementation in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (RISEinFAMILY)

Integrating Families at Neonatal Intensive Care Units for Empowering Them as Primary Caregivres: the Impact of the Program

International, multi-centre, pluri-cultural, stepped wedge cluster controlled trial, to demonstrate superiority of site tailored 'Family integrated care model'(FICare), that promotes the active participation of the parents as primary caregivers of their infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), versus standard NICU care delivery with regards to short-term health outcomes in high-risk newborns with prolonged hospital stay.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Ankara, Turkey, 06560
        • Recruiting
        • Gazi University
        • Contact:
          • Nuriye Ebru Ergenekon, Prof. Dr
          • Phone Number: +90 312 202 6032
          • Email: ebruer@gazi.edu.tr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria For infants :

  1. Birth weight at or below 1500 g or gestational age at or below 34 weeks.
  2. Any other peri-neonatal condition anticipating NICU specialised care.
  3. Admission for at least 7 days
  4. Decision to provide full life support.

Inclusion Criteria For Adults

  1. Willingness to spend at least 6h per day at NICU OR commitment to attend educational sessions
  2. Active involvement in care for their infant at least a 7 day-period
  3. No intellectual or language barriers[A] to understanding
  4. At least one primary caregivers involved in training [B]
  5. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria For Children:

  1. Decision not to provide full life support
  2. Critical illness unlikely to survive
  3. Scheduled for early transfer to another non-FICare hospital (expected hospital stay <7days)

Exclusion Criteria for Parents:

  1. Intellectual handicaps that makes difficult learning-understanding
  2. Communication cannot be established even with translator
  3. Mental, psychiatric problems or under legal supervision
  4. Newborn under guardianship of social services
  5. Lack of parental signed informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FICare intervention
FICare implementation model will be demonstrated by setting 5 pilots in non-FICare-experienced NICUs from NL, TR, RO, UK, ZM (AMC, GU, CLUJ, UHS, and UNZA, partners, respectively) and 2 pilots in clinical sites who have recently implemented FICare from ES and NL (SERMAS and OLVG).
The Family Integrated Care (FICare) programme has been developed in a multicenter cluster randomised controlled trial, with 26 tertiary NICUs from Canada, Australia and New Zealand, comparing standard NICU care (which was mainly care by nurses) (891 infants) to FICare programme (895 infants). FICare model and showed that the involvement of parents in the direct care improved weight gain and increased breastfeeding rates in the preterm infants. In addition, their parents had lower rates of stress and anxiety. These results were confirmed in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Subsequent studies carried out so far have shown promising positive effects on a variety of domains. Maturation profiles have been shown to accelerate with the FICare intervention as a shorter time to achieve exclusive enteral nutrition as well as oral nutrition has been shown in the preterm infants included in FICARE programmes compared to control babies
No Intervention: control intervention
A cohort of patients born at the non-FICare clinical sites (AMC, GU, CLUJ, UHS, and UNZA) from the start of the study (November 2022) to the time assigned to start the intervention. A 3-month washout period will be established for staff training and site readiness.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RISEinFAMILY implementation:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
proportion of families completing basic and advanced training levels (observed vs expected).
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
RISEinFAMILY implementation:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Average time to complete basic and advanced training levels (observed vs expected)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
RISEinFAMILY implementation:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Average time of kangaroo care per day
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Short-term health infant's outcomes
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
proportion of high-risk infants achieving and maintaining adequate growth patterns during NICU admission.
Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reported adverse event rate per 1000 patients/day
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
proportion of infants on exclusive breastfeeding
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Brestfeeding rates at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Number of patients with no breastfeeding
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Brestfeeding rates at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Number of patients with <50% of intake
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Brestfeeding rates at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Number of patients with >50% of intake
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Parental psychological health
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Parental stress will be measured using the abbreviated Pediatric Stress Scale for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PSS PICU).

Scale ranges from 0 to 5, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Parental psychological health
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Anxiety and depression symptoms will be measured using the Four Item Patient health (PHQ-4).

Scale ranges from 0 to 3, higher scores indicate worse outcomes

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Parental psychological health
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Postnatal depression will be measured using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).

Scale ranges from 0 to 3, higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Parental psychological health
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Maternal self-efficacy will be measured using the Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP S-E).

Scale ranges from 0 to 3, higher scores indicate better outcome

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Parental psychological health
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Maternal-to-infant-bonding scale will be measured using the Maternal-to-Infant Bonding Scale.

Score ranges 0 to 3. For items 1,2 and 6, higher scores correlate to better outcomes; for items 2, 3, 5, 7 and 8, higher scores correlate to a worse outcome.

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Parental psychological health
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Resilience will be measured Brief Resilience Scale. Scale ranges from 0 yo 6. For items 4, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 21, higher scores indicate a better outcome. For items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16m 20 and 22 a higher score indicates a worse outcome.
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Day of life (DOL) to complete oral feeding (nasogastric tube removed)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
day of life (DOL) to reach full enteral nutrition (>130 mL/K/day)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
DOL at discharge
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Proportion of infants diagnosed of (at 36 weeks PMA or discharge): bronchopulmonary dysplasia, oxygen dependency, severe retinopathy of prematurity (grade 3 or need for treatment), nosocomial infection necrotising enterocoli
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Satisfaction and self-care of professionals measured by surveys
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Anxiety and depression symptoms will be measured using the anxiety and depression survey (PHQ-4).

The scale ranges from 1 to 3. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Satisfaction and self-care of professionals measured by surveys
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
burnout symptoms will be measured using the Maslach burnout inventory human services survey (MBI-HSS). Scale ranges from 0 to 6. For Items 4, 7, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19 and 21, higher scores indicate a better outcome. For items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 20 and 22, higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Satisfaction and self-care of professionals measured by surveys
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
post-traumatic stress will be measured using (post traumatic stress survey (PTSD-8). Scale ranges from 0 to 3, higher scores indicate worse outcomes
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Satisfaction and self-care of professionals measured by surveys
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Work and wellbeing will be measured using Unwes-9 work and well-being survey (UWES).

Scale ranges from 0 to 6, a higher score indicates a better outcome

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
postmenstrual age (PMA) to complete oral feeding (nasogastric tube removed)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
postmenstrual age (PMA) to reach full enteral nutrition (>130 mL/K/day)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Feeding patterns at discharge:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
postmenstrual age (PMA) at discharge
Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term neurodevelopment: Proportion of infants who survive without neurodevelopmental disabilities at 24 months
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Mid-term infant's general health:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Proportion of infants maintaining adequate growth pattern during the first 12 months after birth
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Mid-term infant's general health:
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)
proportion of infants using health system facilities after discharge
Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded:

For neonates:

Number of days in hospital

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded:

For neonates:

Number of days on different levels of care

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded:

For neonates:

Hospital readmissions (number of episodes)

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded:

For neonates:

Frequentation of emergency service

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded:

For carers :

Number of siblings on care

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

Relation to the newborn on care: parent, legal tutor, other family member

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

average hours/day on care

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

overnight stay at hospital/nearby: number of overnight stays

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

Payment for overnight stay

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

travel to hospital for care: expenses/travel, N of trips

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

other dependents under your care: N of dependents

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Measure levels of resources associated with FICare implementation: The following data will be recorded for carers :

helps received for dependents

Through study completion (average of 24 months)
Economic impact
Time Frame: Through study completion (average of 24 months)

cost-effectiveness estimates compareing current care to previous care model.

The cost-effectiveness analysis of the FICare implementation will be carried out using a decision-analytical model that will be developed and populated with costs and effectiveness data from the pilot studies. For each FICare implementation site the cost-effectiveness of the intervention will be estimated as follows:

ICER= ∆C/∆E where: ICER - incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

  • C - difference in mean costs for post- and pre-intervention.
  • E - difference in mean effectiveness outcomes for post-and pre-intervention.
Through study completion (average of 24 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adelina Pellicer, MD, Hospital Universitario La Paz

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 101007922

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Preterm

Clinical Trials on FICare

Subscribe