Safety and Effectiveness Clinical Evaluation of Injectable Medical Devices Viscol

August 26, 2025 updated by: Kylane Laboratoires

Safety and Effectiveness Clinical Evaluation of Range of Injectable Medical Devices Viscol in Aesthetic Treatment

Evaluation of safety and performance of HA based injectable device for skin quality improvement

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the device used one month (M1) after treatment using clinical evaluation of the global aesthetic improvement (GAIS) rated by an independent investigator.

The secondary objectives of the study are to collect data on:

  • the effectiveness four months (M4) after treatment.
  • the effectiveness on the improvement of facial skin quality by objective measurements of skin biomechanical parameters using Cutometer® and skin hydration using Moisturemeter®.
  • subject's satisfaction and subject's opinion on aesthetic improvement.
  • the injector's satisfaction on the injection quality.
  • the safety using clinical evaluation of the Injection Site Reactions (ISR).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Plan-les-Ouates, Switzerland, 1228
        • Kylane Laboratoires

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy Subject.
  2. Sex: male or female.
  3. Age: between 35 and 70 years.
  4. Subject seeking an improvement for HA skin quality improvement product.
  5. Subject with BMI <30.
  6. Subject whose weight did not fluctuate in the last 6 months and who agrees to keep a stable weight during the study.
  7. Subject having given his/her free, express, and informed consent.
  8. Subject psychologically able to understand the information related to the study, and to give their written informed consent.
  9. Subject registered with a social security scheme.
  10. Women of childbearing potential should use a contraceptive method considered effective since at least 12 weeks and throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria:

In terms of population

  1. Pregnant or nursing woman or planning a pregnancy during the study.
  2. Subject who had been deprived of their freedom by administrative or legal decision or who is under guardianship.
  3. Subject in a social or sanitary establishment.
  4. Subject suspected to be non-compliant according to the investigator's judgment.
  5. Subject having received a total of 6.000 euros as compensations for their participation in clinical research in the last 12 months, including their participation in the present study.
  6. Subject enrolled in another study or whose non-enrollment period is not over.
  7. Subject with scar(s), mole(s), hair or any other lesion on the studied zones which might interfere with the evaluation (tattoo, permanent make-up…). In terms of associated pathology
  8. Subject suffering from a severe or progressive disease or any other pathology that may interfere with the evaluation of the study results and/or subject safety.
  9. Subject with known history of or suffering from autoimmune disease and/or immune deficiency.
  10. Subject suffering from active disease such as inflammation, infection, tumours, inflammatory and/or infectious cutaneous disorders (herpes, acne, rosacea, porphyria …) in the 6 months before screening visit.
  11. Subject with a history of streptococcal disease or an active streptococcus infection.
  12. Subject prone to develop inflammatory skin conditions or having tendency to bleeding disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Device under investigation
Injection of the device by investigators according to the IFU

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance at 1 Month Investigator Overall VISCOL Range
Time Frame: 1 month
Primary endpoint was the percentage of subjects having an improvement of the zone treated with the overall FILLGEL range of devices, in all the indications, as assessed by the independent investigator, one month after treatment, using the GAIS (subjects with a GAIS "improved", "much improved" or "very much improved"). This proportion of responders was compared to a theoretical proportion of 60%.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Performance at 4 Months Investigator Overall VISCOL Range
Time Frame: 4 months
Percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "improved", "much improved" and "very much improved") for the whole VISCOL range.
4 months
Percentage of Indications With Response: GAIS Investigator Overall VISCOL Range
Time Frame: 1 month & 4 months

Responder rate for the whole indication of VISCOL range at M1 and M4- GAIS investigator (N=95 indications).

Percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved" or "Improved") for the whole VISCOL range as assessed by an independent investigator.

1 month & 4 months
Performance at 1 & 4 Months Subject Overall VISCOL Range
Time Frame: 1 month, 4 months
Percentage of responders for the whole VISCOL range as assessed by the subject. This percentage of responders was compared to a theoretical proportion of 60%
1 month, 4 months
Percentage of Indications With Response: GAIS Subject Overall VISCOL Range
Time Frame: 1 month & 4 months
Responder rate for the whole indication of VISCOL range at M1 and M4- GAIS subject (N=95 indications) Percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved" or "Improved") for the whole VISCOL range as assessed by the subject.
1 month & 4 months
Percentage of Responder With Response: GAIS Investigator by Indication Overall VISCOL Range
Time Frame: 1 month & 4 months

Responder rate for the whole VISCOL range by indication at M1 and M4- GAIS combined score (investigator and subjects) (N=95 indications).

It represents the percentage of responders (subjects with a GAIS "Very Much Improved", "Much Improved" or "Improved") for the whole VISCOL range by indication as assessed by the subject as well as by the investigator.

1 month & 4 months
Injector Satisfaction Questionnaire Viscol
Time Frame: D0 (Immediatly after injection)

Distribution of each item of the questionnaire answered by the injectors. For each item of the injector questionnaire, the percentage of answers "very satisfied" and satisfied were computed as "Satisfied" and the percentage of answers "Neither satisfied" ,or "dissatisfied", "dissatisfied" and "very dissatisfied" were computed as Dissatisfied.

The measure reported is the percentage of participants who were "Satisfied".

D0 (Immediatly after injection)
Subject Satisfaction Questionnaire Viscol
Time Frame: 1 month, 4 months

Distribution of each item of the questionnaire answered by the subjects injected with Viscol. For each item of the subject questionnaire, the percentage of answers "totally agree" and "agree" were computed as "Agree" and the percentage of answers "Neither agree and disagree",or "disagree" and "totally disagree" and "very dissatisfied" were computed as "Disagree".

The measure reported is the percentage of participants who "Agree".

1 month, 4 months
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 months
Percentage of participants who experienced at least one Adverse Event (AE), Adverse Device Effect (ADE), and/or Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 23E1077

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aesthetic Dermatology

Clinical Trials on Dermal Filler Device

Subscribe