- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06176092
UCF Deciding Brains
The purpose of this research study is to understand how people make trust-related decisions in healthy aging.
Participants will be asked to complete one study session on the University of Central Florida (UCF) campus. The study session will be conducted in a private testing room and include a series of computerized cognitive tasks and learning games, as well as surveys of your beliefs, preferences, and past experiences.
The study will take a total of approximately 3.5 hours to completed. You will be allowed to take breaks during the session as needed. If you begin the study but do not complete the session, you will receive credit commensurate with your participation.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Much of human interaction is based on trust. Optimal trust-related decision making and avoiding exploitation require the ability to learn about the trustworthiness of social partners across multiple interactions, but the role that learning plays in determining age deficits in trust decisions is currently unknown. To address this gap, this project will characterize basic cognitive processes in learning to trust and distrust in healthy aging.
The present study will examine age differences in learning to trust using laboratory tasks and surveys. The investigators hypothesize that social cues of trustworthiness will bias learning more in older adults (social cue bias, H1). Further, we predict that social cues of trustworthiness will interact with weighting of negative (loss aversion bias, H2) and recent (recency bias; H3) outcomes, and that these biases are exacerbated in older adults compared with younger adults (H4).
Young adult participants (age 20-39 years) will be recruited through the SONA pool. Older adult participants (age 60 and older) will be recruited from the University of Central Florida (UCF) Learning and Longevity Research Network (LLRN) registry and will be contacted by lab personnel via emails. Emails retrieved from the LLRN registry are provided by older-aged participants who wished to be contacted for research. Older adults will be screened to exclude those with cognitive impairment before being invited to participate. Those who meet criteria for inclusion in the study, will be scheduled for a study session in the lab.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Erica Martin, B.S.
- Phone Number: 4072668742
- Email: erica.martin@ucf.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Amoy Fraser, PhD
- Phone Number: 4072668742
- Email: amoy.fraser@ucf.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Orlando, Florida, United States, 32827
- Recruiting
- University of Central Florida
-
Contact:
- Amoy Fraser, PhD, CCRP, PMP
- Phone Number: 4072668742
- Email: amoy.fraser@ucf.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Younger adults only: Age 20-39 years old
- Older adults only: Age 60 years old and older
- Fluent English speaker
- At least 8th grade education
- On a stable regimen of medications
- Able to provide verbal and written informed consent
Normal cognitive function
- Older adults only: The above will be assessed/confirmed via cognitive screening assessments
- Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status (TICS-M; see "Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status" in Local Site Documents)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant
Presence of:
- Schizophrenia Spectrum or Other Psychotic Disorders
- Bipolar and Related Disorders
- Depressive Disorders
- Anxiety Disorders
- Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders
- Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders
- Current anticonvulsant, neuroleptic, or sedative use
- Uncorrected visual and hearing impairments
- Neurologic condition or event affecting the brain in the last 12 months (e.g., stroke, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury with >30-minute loss of consciousness)
- History of brain surgery including tumor resection, deep brain resection, pallidotomy, and thalamotomy
- Unstable medical illness (e.g., metastatic cancer)
- Significant cardiovascular condition or event in the last 12 months (e.g., major heart attack, heart bypass surgery
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Younger Adults (ages 20-39)
The study will examine age differences in learning to trust using laboratory tasks and surveys.
|
|
Older Adults (60 and older)
The study will examine age differences in learning to trust using laboratory tasks and surveys.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
NIH Cognitive Toolbox
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The NIH Toolbox which includes cognitive tasks to measure: Cognitive Function Composite Score, Fluid Cognition Composite Score, and Crystallized Cognition Composite Score
|
1 year
|
|
social Iowa Gambling Task (sIGT)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
To investigate how older adults learn to trust others over multiple interactions, we developed the social Iowa Gambling Task (sIGT); modeled after the original Iowa Gambling Task.
|
1 year
|
|
Florida-Arizona Gambling Task (FLAG)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
To examine choices between a sure offer and a draw from a deck of cards.
|
1 year
|
|
Phishing Email Suspicion Test (PEST)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
This measures an individual's ability to detect phishing emails and has ecological validity pertaining to real-life internet fraud susceptibility.
|
1 year
|
|
Detection of Liars and Truth Tellers (LIE Task)
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Participants will view brief videos of real crime suspects, who were either lying (liars) or telling the truth (truth tellers) about their involvement in the disappearance of a relative
|
1 year
|
|
Charity Task
Time Frame: 1 year
|
This charity task assesses factors that can potentially influence charitable giving to organizations among younger and older adults, including familiarity, transparency, and personal importance.
|
1 year
|
|
Survey battery
Time Frame: 1 year
|
The following surveys will that assess individual differences in CISDA factors and other potential exploitation risk predictors will be administered: (i) Theory of mind: (ii) Memory systems (iii) Socio-emotional processing (iv) Pain measures (v) Phishing vulnerability (vi) Demographics |
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Nichole Lighthall, PhD, University of Central Florida
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00005797
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Trust
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenKU LeuvenCompleted
-
California State Polytechnic University, PomonaCompleted
-
Loma Linda UniversityRecruiting
-
University of Texas at AustinWithdrawn
-
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)CompletedPatient Doctor Trust
-
Seattle Children's HospitalEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedTrust | Respect | Study EnrollmentUnited States
-
East Carolina UniversityRecruitingVaccine Hesitancy | Structural Barriers | Vaccine TrustUnited States
-
Cornell UniversityCompletedCommunication | Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice | TrustUnited States
-
University of Ontario Institute of TechnologyCompletedTrust | Registered Dietitian | Conflict of Interest | Credibility | TransparencyCanada
-
University of PennsylvaniaMerakey Behavioral HealthCompletedImpact of Feedback on Symptoms and Trust/Respect on OutcomesUnited States