- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06269536
Stress-reducing Intervention in Urothelial Carcinoma
A Study on Therapeutic Potential of Stress-reducing Intervention in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, interventional, clinical study with a target of 50 subjects and an anticipated total duration of 36 months.
The goal of this study is to test the HRV BI in patients with MIBC treated with total of 3 to 4 courses of chemotherapy Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 1 (GC, new course day 22) or Methotrexate 30 mg/m2 day 1, Doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 2, Vinblastine 3 mg/m2 day 2, Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 with Pegfilgrastim 6 mg s.c. day 4 (ddMVAC, new course day 15) in neoadjuvant setting followed by radical cystectomy or irradiation concomitantly with cisplatin 70 mg/m2 weekly (SOC) and compare to SOC.
Participants will undergo 4 sessions of HRV BI with the trainer where they will learn about the prognostic role of the vagal nerve in cancer and in reducing distress and pain, and how to perform deep paced breathing with the HRV monitoring. They will perform the training daily (3-times, minimum 7 minutes each) at home with the online control for 3 months.
Researchers will compare the effect of addition of 3-months training of HRV BI to SOC on inflammation, HRV, quality of life (QoL), cognitive functions, salivary cortisol slopes, sleep quality and treatment outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Luba Hunáková
- Phone Number: +421290119943
- Email: luba.hunakova@fmed.uniba.sk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bratislava, Slovakia, 83310
- Recruiting
- National Cancer Institute
-
Contact:
- Katarina Rejlekova
- Email: katarina.rejlekova@nou.sk
-
Principal Investigator:
- Patrik Palacka
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients older than 18 years.
- Evidence of muscle-infiltrating urothelial bladder carcinoma (including variants) by biopsy.
- No prior chemotherapy.
- No previous malignancy, except for basal-cell carcinoma of the skin within last 5 years.
- Adequate renal functions: measured or calculated (by Cockcroft formula) creatinine clearance > 60 ml/min.
- Absolute granulocytes count 1,500/mm3 or higher, platelets 100,000/mm3 or higher, bilirubin 1.5x the upper limit of normal value and lower.
- Adequate liver functions.
- Basic computer skills.
- Signed informed consent.
Exclusion criteria:
- Diabetes mellitus with symptomatic neuropathy.
- Using antiarrhythmic drugs, opiates and/or antidepressants.
- Implanted permanent pacemaker (PPM).
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection.
- Not fitting inclusion criteria.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Heart-rate variability (HRV) biofeedback intervention + standard of care
Deep paced breathing with the HRV monitoring performed three times a day for seven minutes during three months with standard of care.
|
Daily deep paced breathing 3-times (minimum 7 minutes each) for 3 months
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of care
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 + Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 1 (new course day 22) or Methotrexate 30 mg/m2 day 1, Doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 day 2, Vinblastine 3 mg/m2 day 2, Cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2 with Pegfilgrastim 6 mg s.c.
day 4 (new course day 15) up to 4 courses followed by radical cystectomy or irradiation with cisplatin 70 mg/m2 weekly.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Objective: Inflammation
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on inflammation (IL-6, Tumor necrosis factor α, IL-10 in pg/ml).
|
36 months
|
|
Primary Objective: Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on HRV indexed by the root mean square of successive differences between heartbeats (RMSSD) in ms.
|
36 months
|
|
Primary Objective: Quality of Life (QoL)
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on EORTC-QLQ-C30 (version 3) score.
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 has 30 items divided into five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), and three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting).
The score for each scale as well as the sum score for the whole instrument is standardized to values 0 to 100, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome.
|
36 months
|
|
Primary Objective: Working memory
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on working memory measured by digit span test score (the number of remembered digits in the longest passed sequence), for both forward and backward condition.
|
36 months
|
|
Primary objective: Executive function
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on executive function measured by Stroop task mean response time for color-word condition.
|
36 months
|
|
Primary objective: Salivary Cortisol Slopes
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on salivary cortisol slopes (difference between bedtime and awakening saliva cortisol concentration in ng/ml).
|
36 months
|
|
Primary objective: Sleep Quality
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-month heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on sleep quality measured by both actigraphy and self-report data.
The main variables are total time spent sleeping (in hours and minutes), and sleep efficiency (proportion of time spent sleeping vs. time spent in bed trying to sleep).
|
36 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary objective: Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: 36 months
|
The effect of 3-months heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on serious adverse events (SAEs) of chemotherapy.
|
36 months
|
|
Secondary objective: Disease-Free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 60 months
|
The effect of 3-months heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on disease-free survival (DFS).
|
60 months
|
|
Secondary objective: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 60 months
|
The effect of 3-months heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback training and conventional cancer treatment (standard of care, SOC) vs. SOC alone on overall survival (OS).
|
60 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Patrik Palacka, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UC-SK004
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.