Pivotal Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of SP5M001 Inj. as Compared to Synovian Inj. in Patients With Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis

March 11, 2024 updated by: Shin Poong Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Active Controlled, Non-Inferiority, Phase III Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of SP5M001 Inj. as Compared to Synovian Inj. in Patients With Mild to Moderate Knee Osteoarthritis

This is a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, non-inferiority, pivotal clinical trial to assess the efficacy and safety of the novel hexamethylenediamine (HMDA) cross-linked hyaluronate intra-articular injection (SP5M001) compared with an active comparator, the 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) cross-linked hyaluronate (Synovian) in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

223

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Yeungnam University Medical Center
      • Hwasun, Korea, Republic of
        • Cheonam National University Hwasun Hospital
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of
        • Gachon University Gil Medical Center
      • Jeonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Jeonbuk National University Hospital
      • Sejong, Korea, Republic of
        • Chungnam national university hospital
      • Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Seoul National University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Samsung Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Chung-Ang University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Soon Chun Hyang University Hospital Seoul
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • KyungHee University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult males and females aged 40 years or older as of the date of written consent
  2. Subject with knee osteoarthritis whose X-ray test results within 6 months from the screening or at the screening visit correspond to grades I - III of the Kellgren & Lawrence scale
  3. Subject diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral knee osteoarthritis according to the clinical diagnostic criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) at screening who have knee joint pain and meet three or more of the following conditions

    • Over 50 years of age

      • Less than 30 minutes of morning stiffness ③ Crepitus on active motion ④ Bony tenderness ⑤ Bony enlargement ⑥ No palpable warmth of synovium
  4. Weight bearing pain (WBP) of at least one of both knee joints on 100 mm-VAS ≥ 40 mm when measured at screening and baseline [However, if both sides have symptoms, the knee joint with the higher WBP becomes the joint for evaluation, and the selected joint cannot be changed during the study period.]
  5. Walk without relying on a walking aid such as a walker or cane (patients who have been using a walking aid every day since 6 months prior to the screening visit can use the walking aid, and must use the walking aid in the same way throughout the study period.)
  6. Ability to fully understand and complete the safety and efficacy measurement questionnaire
  7. Voluntary decision for participation and provision of written consent to comply with the precautions after hearing and fully understanding the detailed explanation of the purpose, method, and effects of this study

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35 kg/m2 at screening
  2. Hip osteoarthritis or osteoarthritis of another joint that is severe enough to preclude evaluation of knee osteoarthritis at the time of screening
  3. Having the following diseases that may affect the efficacy and safety evaluation but not being limited to the following

    • Septic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, recurrent pseudogout arthritis, trauma that may damage joint cartilage, congenital abnormalities, calcium deposition disease, diabetes, ochronosis, hemochromatosis, acromegaly, Wilson's disease, primary osteochondrosis, genetic diseases (e.g., hyperkinesis), secondary osteoarthritis caused by collagen gene abnormalities, etc.
    • Sudek's atrophy or severe painful diseases such as Paget's disease
  4. Infection or skin disease in the joint area that is unsuitable for injection at the time of screening

    • 5) Active or suspected knee joint infection at the time of screening
    • 6) Complete loss of the Patello-femoral joint space
    • 7) Received the following treatments within 14 days of the screening visit (except those who have passed a 14-day wash-out) or scheduled to be administered during the study period
    • Taking medicines containing ingredients such as glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and diacerhein
    • Taking herbal medicines and herbal medicines for osteoarthritis
    • Taking anti-inflammatory painkillers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, prescription/non-prescription drugs), etc. (administration of acetaminophen allowed if passing a 3 day wash-out)
    • Taking oral steroids
    • Hospital physical therapy or oriental medicine treatment (cupping, acupuncture, moxibustion, etc.)

8) Intra-articular injection, such as intra-articular corticosteroid, at the injection site within 6 months from the time of screening 9) Systemic use of steroids within 3 months from the time of screening (including inhalants, however, topical application is permitted only on the upper body) 10) Hyaluronic acid intra-articular injection administered to the injection site within 6 months from the time of screening 11) Surgical operations such as knee joint replacement, including arthroscopic surgery, at the administration site within 6 months from the time of screening; or expecting surgery within 10 months 12) History of artificial joint surgery on the knee joint subject for evaluation 13) Knee joint subject for evaluation diagnosed as Kellgren Lawrence grade 4 within 6 months from the time of screening 14) Moderate or severe joint effusion by Patella tap test at the screening visit 15) History of hypersensitivity to ingredients of the IP or active control drug 16) Antiplatelet agents (excluding aspirin of 300 mg/day or less), heparin, oral anticoagulants (coumarin anticoagulants, thrombin inhibitors, Factor Xa inhibitors, etc.), and thrombolytics must be used during the study 17) Clinically significant abnormalities in liver function (3 times or more than the upper limit of normal for ALT/AST) or abnormalities in renal function (3 times or more than the upper limit of normal for serum creatinine), or severe liver or renal disease at the discretion of the investigator which is judged to have an impact on the effectiveness and safety evaluation of the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SP5M001 inj
SP5M001 inj 5 ml pre-filled syringe into Knee joint cavity of osteoarthritis patients
pre-filled syringe
Active Comparator: Synovian inj
Synovian inj 3 ml pre-filled syringe into Knee joint cavity of osteoarthritis patients
pre-filled syringe

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in [Weight-Bearing Pain (WBP)-100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)] at Week 12 from baseline (visit 2)
Time Frame: week 12
* Weight Bearing Pain (WBP) - 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the following at each visit : Weight Bearing pain(WBP) (Weeks 2, 6, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 24, 36
Outcome Measurement of Weight Bearing pain(WBP): 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 2, 6, 24, 36
Changes in the following at each visit : Rest pain (RP) (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Outcome Measurement of Rest pain (RP): 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Changes in the following at each visit : Night pain (NP) (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Outcome Measurement of Night pain (NP): 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Changes in the following at each visit : Motion pain (MP) (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Outcome Measurement of Motion pain (MP): 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Changes in the following at each visit : Patient Global Assessment(PGA) (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Outcome Measurement of Patient Global Assessment(PGA): 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Changes in the following at each visit : Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Outcome Measurement of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) : 100mm-visual analogue scale (VAS)
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Changes in the following at each visit : Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total score and individual score evaluation (Pain, function, stiffness) (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36) from baseline (Visit 2)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36

Outcome Measurement of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Total score and individual score evaluation (Pain, function, stiffness)

: WOMAC-Likert Assessment (5-point Likert scale)

week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Physical assessments at each post-administration visit: Swelling (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36

Outcome Measurement of Swelling: 4-point scale

*4-point scale: 0(none)/1(mild)/2(moderate)/3(severe)

week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Physical assessments at each post-administration visit: joint-line tenderness on pressure (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36

Outcome Measurement of joint-line tenderness: 4-point scale

*4-point scale: 0(none)/1(mild)/2(moderate)/3(severe)

week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Physical assessments at each post-administration visit: range of motion (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
The angle was recorded as is for the range of motion.
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Proportion of participants who took rescue medication at each post-administration visit and dose of rescue medication (Weeks 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36
Post-administration response rate A. Proportion at which WBP decreases by at least 20 mm or improves by at least 40% from baseline at the time of evaluation (B section-Description)
Time Frame: week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36

*B. Response rate of OMERACT-OARSI (Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International) I. At least 50% improvement in WOMAC pain or function at the time of evaluation; or at least a 20 point improvement from baseline; or II. meeting 2 of the 3 conditions below

  • At least 20% improvement in WOMAC pain, at least a 10 point improvement from each baseline
  • At least 20% improvement in WOMAC function, at least a 10 point improvement from each baseline
  • At least 20% improvement in patient's global assessment (100 mm-VAS) and at least a 10 point improvement from each baseline
week 2, 6, 12, 24, 36

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The incidence rate of Pre-treatment AEs
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of Solicited Local AEs
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE)
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of Serious TEAEs leading to Drug withdrawn
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of Serious TEAEs leading to Death
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of abnormal CS at Post-Treatment on Laboratory
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of abnormal CS at Post-Treatment on Electrocardiogram
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36
The incidence rate of abnormal on Physical Examination
Time Frame: From week 0 to week 36
From week 0 to week 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis Thumb

Clinical Trials on SP5M001 inj

Subscribe