Mechanisms of a Dynamic Stability Approach

November 11, 2025 updated by: University of Minnesota

Background. Arthritis is the leading cause of disability in the United States and osteoarthritis (OA) of the hand affects an estimated 25.6 US residents. OA of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is the most disabling form of hand OA. Rehabilitation for persons with thumb CMC OA is recommended as the initial treatment and often involves instruction on joint protection and fitting of a splint to reduce joint stress and pain. More recently, evidence has suggested that specialized exercise may impact a factor linked to this condition, altered joint mechanics. Health records data also suggests that these exercises reduce pain and disability more than what would be experienced by those receiving standard care (SOC) rehabilitation. However, there has not yet been a prospective investigation on how these dynamic stability (DS) exercises alter joint mechanics, improve function, and reduce pain relative to standard treatment. Relatedly, thumb CMC mechanics are most often assessed by physicians through CAT scan and although rehabilitation therapists are not licensed to conduct such assessments, they could benefit from 'real-time' imaging to inform and evaluate the mechanical effects of treatment. Sonography might afford therapists the precision to evaluate mechanical response to treatment yet it is not yet known if thumb CMC sonography corresponds with the gold standard, CAT scan.

Goal and Specific Aims. The long term goal this line of study is to reduce the effects of thumb CMC OA on activity performance and participation through non-invasive and non- pharmacological interventions. We expect to achieve our goals by pursuit of the following two specific aims: 1). Determine if a novel exercise regimen reduces radiographic thumb CMC joint misalignment among persons with thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis and 2) Evaluate the accuracy of ultrasound compared with CAT scan (reference standard) for quantifying thumb CMC subluxation

Design and Methods. Specific aim 1 will be addressed through a prospective pre-post interventional study of a 8-week clinic-based dynamic stability program and will undergo a CAT scan before treatment and upon completion of the program (9 weeks) and specific aim 3 will be addressed through a psychometric 'concurrent validity' design.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults with radiographically-confirmed thumb CMC OA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Persons who have had cortisone treatments to the affected thumb within the prior three months, thumb CMC joint replacement, inflammatory arthritis, Ehlers Danlos Syndrome, Marfan's disease, pregnancy or questionable pregnancy, cognitive disorders which would preclude a client from following the testing commands and home program participation, concomitant conditions affecting the arthritic thumb, grade 4 arthritis staging, no ongoing hand rehabilitation (i.e., within prior 6 months), non-English Speaking, and pain which precludes participants from completing testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dynamic Stability Exercise Program
Involves four 60-minute occupational therapy visits as well as a daily home program across a 8-week period. Clinic visits focus primarily on home program coaching, and progression of the exercise regimen. Home programs involve daily exercises which follow the intensity and duration recommended for older adults. The intervention focuses on enhancing mobility and strength of the thumb for use during daily activities.
The thumb CMC DS intervention involves four 60-minute occupational therapy visits as well as a daily home program across a 8-week period. Clinic visits focus primarily on home program coaching, and progression of the exercise regimen. Home programs involve daily exercises which follow the intensity and duration recommended for older adults.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subluxation of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint as Per CAT Scan
Time Frame: baseline
CAT scan will be used at baseline and 9 weeks to obtain measurements as per the American College of Radiology's 2013 Technical Standards. A validated positioning jig reproduced by our lab will be used to maintain standardized joint positioning and standardize stress to the thumb metacarpal during fluoroscopic examination. "Joint subluxation" is a measure of thumb CMC instability and will be measured in millimeters.
baseline
Subluxation of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint as Per CAT Scan
Time Frame: 9 weeks post intervention
CAT scan will be used at baseline and 9 weeks to obtain measurements as per the American College of Radiology's 2013 Technical Standards. A validated positioning jig reproduced by our lab will be used to maintain standardized joint positioning and standardize stress to the thumb metacarpal during fluoroscopic examination. "Joint subluxation" is a measure of thumb CMC instability and will be measured in millimeters.
9 weeks post intervention
Subluxation of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint as Per Sonography
Time Frame: baseline
Sonographic assessment of thumb carpometacarpal subluxation will occur at the time of participants' baseline CAT scan. The same views, position jig and standardized upper limb postures used for the fluoroscopic assessments will again be employed. The thumb CMC joint sonographic procedures described by Oo et al. and the general guidelines put forth by American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine will be followed. Long axis views of the dorsal and radial borders of the thumb CMC joint will be visualized via use of the Philips Lumify Portable Sonography Device. In these views, the amount of translation of metacarpal base with respect to trapezium will be quantified in millimeters
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Michigan Hand Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
Disability was measured with the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), an upper extremity-specific self-report questionnaire assessing symptomology and disability across 6 domains: hand function, activities of daily living, work performance, satisfaction, aesthetics/cosmesis, and pain. Right- and left-hand total and subscale scores are produced. Scores range from 0-100, with higher total scores and scores across the first 5 subscales indicating greater abilities or better results, and lower scores on the last subscale indicating less pain. The MHQ has high reliability, validity, and responsiveness among adults with upper extremity rheumatic conditions including OA. For this study, only the total score of the affected hand was reported. Given the high prevalence of bilateral CMC1 OA, the total score from the dominant hand was selected when bilateral CMC1 OA was present.
Baseline
Michigan Hand Questionnaire
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Disability was measured with the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), an upper extremity-specific self-report questionnaire assessing symptomology and disability across 213 6 domains: hand function, activities of daily living, work performance, satisfaction, aesthetics/cosmesis, and pain. Right- and left-hand total and subscale scores are produced. Scores range from 0-100, with higher total scores and scores across the first 5 subscales indicating greater abilities or better results, and lower scores on the last subscale indicating less pain. The MHQ has high reliability, validity, and responsiveness among adults with upper extremity rheumatic conditions including OA. For this study, only the total score of the affected 219 hand was reported. Given the high prevalence of bilateral CMC1 OA, the total score from the dominant hand was selected when bilateral CMC1 OA was present.
9 weeks
Numerical Pain Rating
Time Frame: Baseline
Pain severity was measured with a 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), from which participants rated their pain intensity during daily activities over the last 24 hours, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. The NPRS was selected because it has been established as a clinically relevant tool in persons with various rheumatic diagnoses including CMC1 OA.
Baseline
Numerical Pain Rating
Time Frame: 9 weeks
Pain severity was measured with a 0-10 Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), from which participants rated their pain intensity during daily activities over the last 24 hours, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst imaginable pain. The NPRS was selected because it has been established as a clinically relevant tool in persons with various rheumatic diagnoses including CMC1 OA.
9 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Corey McGee, UMN

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 11, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OT-2021-30466
  • UL1TR002494 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • KL2TR002492 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Dynamic Stability Exercise Program

Subscribe