Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Placebo Injection (Thumbs-up)

April 3, 2026 updated by: Evi Loos, Goed Medisch Centrum

Thumb Base Osteoarthritis: Ultrasound-guided Platelet-rich Plasma Versus Placebo Injection (Thumbs-up Study)

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections improve pain and function in adults with thumb base osteoarthritis (CMC-I OA).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does a PRP injection reduce pain compared to a placebo (saline) injection? Does PRP improve hand function, strength, and thumb mobility? What adverse events occur following PRP treatment?

Researchers will compare PRP injections to a placebo injection (saline solution) to determine whether PRP is an effective treatment for CMC-I osteoarthritis.

Participants will:

Receive a single ultrasound-guided injection of PRP or placebo (saline) in the CMC-I joint.

Attend follow-up visits at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for clinical assessments. Complete questionnaires on pain (VAS) and hand function (MHQ-DLV) at multiple time points.

Undergo physical examinations (grip strength, pinch strength, thumb motion). Undergo ultrasound evaluations to assess joint characteristics.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

88

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 or older
  • Patients with an Eaton-littler score of I, II or III
  • Patients with uni- or bilateral CMC-I osteoarthritis
  • Non-responders to conservative therapy i.e., hand therapy and immobilisation after 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Aged below 18
  • Patients with an Eaton-littler score of IV (STT arthrosis)
  • Surgical interventions of the CMC-I joint
  • A known articular systemic disease (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis) or additional hand osteoarthritis/ tenosynovitis or metabolic disease like diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with an infectious arthritis of CMC-I joint
  • A known psychiatric condition
  • Neuropathic chronic pain syndrome
  • Intra articular injection 6 months prior to inclusion
  • Smoking
  • Active use of statins

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Platelet-rich plasma group A
Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is prepared from 90 mL of the participant's venous blood using a standardized two-step centrifugation protocol (ACP® Max system, Arthrex Inc.). The first centrifugation is performed at 3200 rpm for 9 minutes, followed by a second centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes, resulting in approximately 2 mL of PRP. A single injection of 2 mL PRP is administered under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance into the CMC-I joint, consisting of 1 mL intra-articular and 1 mL peri-articular injection. No repeated injections are performed.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group B
Saline
Participants receive a placebo injection consisting of 2 mL sterile saline (0.9% NaCl), administered under sterile conditions and ultrasound guidance into the CMC-I joint. The injection protocol is identical to the PRP group, with 1 mL injected intra-articularly and 1 mL peri-articularly. To maintain blinding, participants in the placebo group undergo a venous blood draw mimicking the PRP preparation procedure; however, the collected blood is discarded. The duration and procedural steps are standardized to ensure comparable treatment conditions between groups. No repeated injections are performed.
Other Names:
  • Placebo injection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical pain improvement: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a continuous scale ranging from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates worst imaginable pain. A decrease in VAS score reflects an improvement in pain.
3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional improvement: Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ-DLV)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Hand function will be assessed using the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Dutch Language Version (MHQ-DLV). The MHQ is a patient-reported outcome measure consisting of multiple domains (including overall hand function, activities of daily living, pain, work performance, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction), each scored on a scale from 0 to 100. For all domains except pain, higher scores indicate better hand function and greater satisfaction. For the pain domain, higher scores indicate more severe pain.
3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Functional improvement: Grip and pinch test
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Functional improvement: Opposition of the thumb (pollexograph)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Functional improvement: Kapandji Opposition Score
Time Frame: 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Thumb opposition will be assessed using the Kapandji Opposition Score, a clinical scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no opposition and 10 indicates maximal opposition of the thumb across the palm. Higher scores indicate better thumb function and greater range of opposition.
3, 6, 9 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thumb Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injections

Subscribe