Operation ACL: Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

April 5, 2024 updated by: Jesper Augustsson, Linnaeus University

Scientific Research Question

Overall Purpose:

Regarding rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), there is a knowledge gap - a lack of evidence. Important questions such as how rehabilitation should be structured, what it should include, and how it should be evaluated are currently not clear. Therefore, the investigators plan to conduct a two-year follow-up randomized controlled trial (RCT) on post-ACLR rehabilitation.

Moreover, detailed information on how/under what circumstances the ACL injury occurred is not satisfactorily described in the literature. Therefore, the investigators are planning a new survey that can identify, explain, and prevent the risk factors causing a person to suffer from an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Specific Objectives:

How should guidelines for rehabilitation after ACLR be structured, what should they include, and how should they be evaluated to best restore knee function in the patient? Can a detailed and comprehensive survey identify, explain, and prevent the risk factors causing a person to suffer from an ACL injury?

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The overall aim of the project is to improve the physiotherapeutic guidelines to enhance the quality of rehabilitation for patients with surgically repaired anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. ACL injury is a severe knee injury that often prevents young individuals from continuing sports activities at their desired level. It can eventually lead to knee osteoarthritis within 10-15 years after the initial injury. Despite existing research on preventive training for young athletes in high-risk sports such as soccer, handball, and floorball, this injury remains common. ACL injury in young female athletes engaged in contact sports is 2-5 times more prevalent compared to young males. Regarding rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction, literature often indicates inadequacies where full muscle strength or jumping ability has not been regained. Despite this, patients often return to sports activities, which may increase the risk of re-injury. Guidelines for structuring rehabilitation, its content, and evaluation need improvement accordingly.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Sverige
      • Kalmar, Sverige, Sweden, 39363
        • Linnaeus University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Athletes or recreational athletes that have undergone ACLR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that have undergone ACLR that are nor athletes or recreational athletes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Traditional program
Rehabilitation using a traditional program
Applying new training method; the Nordic hamstring exercise
Conventional rehabilitation training administered
Experimental: Novel program
Rehabilitation using a novel program
Applying new training method; the Nordic hamstring exercise
Conventional rehabilitation training administered

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Isokinetic muscle strength
Time Frame: Tests at 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.
Test of each patient's unilateral maximal isokinetic muscle strength for the involved and the uninvolved leg, using an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex isokinetic dynamometry system 4).
Tests at 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.
Single-leg hop performance
Time Frame: Tests at 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.
Test of each patient's single-leg hop performance for the involved and the uninvolved leg. The goal is to have a less than 10% difference in hop distance between the injured limb and uninjured limb.
Tests at 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Survey at 10 weeks and 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury. It holds 42 items in 5 separately scored subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec), and knee-related Quality of Life (QOL). The score is a percentage score from 0 to 100, 0 representing extreme problems and 100 representing no problems.
Survey at 10 weeks and 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.
ACL Return to Sport after Injury scale
Time Frame: Survey at 10 weeks and 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.
The ACL - Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale measure athletes' emotion, confidence, and risk appraisal when returning to sports after an ACL injury and/or reconstructive surgery. The survey consists of 12 items that are graded on a visual analogue scale from 0 points (extremely negative psychological responses) to 100 points (no negative psychological responses).
Survey at 10 weeks and 8, 12, 18 and 24 months post-ACLR.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jesper Augustsson, PhD, Linnéuniversitetet

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB2022-06554-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

There is a plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

From year 2026 to 2031.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Other researcher within the field of ACLR-rehabilitation.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe