A Chinese Herbal Medicine for IBS-C (CDD2105RCT1)

March 20, 2024 updated by: ZhaoXiang Bian, Hong Kong Baptist University

The Efficacy and Safety of a Chinese Herbal Medicine for the Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C): a Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial

This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized pilot clinical trial will test the hypothesis that granules of CDD-2105, a Chinese herbal medicine formula, will have efficacy in alleviating constipation and abdominal pain in individuals with IBS-C. Participants (n=78) will be randomly assigned to the treatment or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio, followed by 4 weeks of intervention and 4 weeks of follow-up.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized pilot clinical trial will test the hypothesis that granules of CDD-2105, a Chinese herbal medicine formula, will have efficacy in alleviating constipation and abdominal pain in individuals with IBS-C. Participants (n=78) will be randomly assigned to the treatment or placebo group in a 1:1 ratio, followed by 4 weeks of intervention and 4 weeks of follow-up.Primary Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of CDD-2105 granules for treating IBS-C.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

78

Phase

  • Phase 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years adults
  • Fulfill the clinically diagnosed with IBS-C based on the ROME IV criteria
  • Abdominal pain intensity: weekly average of the worst daily (in the past 24 hours) abdominal pain score of ≥3.0 on a 0 to 10 point scale (based on the 2-week E-diary in screening)
  • CSBM ≤ 2 times/week (based on the 2-week E-diary in screening)
  • Understand and be able to follow written and oral instructions in Chinese
  • Provide informed consent
  • Able to use and complete 2-week E-diary for screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Drug-induced or secondary causes of constipation
  • Use of medications and/or supplements that may confound the study outcomes (including but not limited to antibiotics, steroid, analgesic drug, neuromodulator, prebiotics, symbiotics, or probiotics)
  • Clinically significant colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy examination findings after the onset of symptoms for patients who (1) is ≥50 years old; and/or (2) has family risk of colon-rectal cancer or familial polyposis syndromes; and/or (3) has alarm symptoms within 6 months before screening (unintentional weight loss: >10% in 3 months, blood in the stools not caused by hemorrhoids or anal fissures, fever of unknown origin, anemia)
  • Clinically significant laboratory or imaging findings within 6 months before screening
  • Recent history of mushy or watery stools within one month
  • Allergic to Chinese herbal medicine or G6PD
  • Abdominal surgeries within the past year (except laparoscopic appendectomy)
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding or plan to become pregnant with the study timeframe
  • Any disease(s), condition(s) or habit(s) deemed by the investigators that would compromise the individual's ability to complete the study, e.g. serious psychiatric conditions, at the discretion of the investigators
  • Any disease(s), condition(s) or habit(s) deemed by the investigators that would prevent participation in the study, e.g. participation in past or active clinical research, at the discretion of the investigators

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment group
During the 4-week intervention, participants are required to consume 4.7g of CDD-2105 granule (a Chinese herbal medicine formula containing four granular herbs) twice per day.
A Chinese herbal medicine formula containing four granular herbs.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
During the 4-week intervention, participants are required to consume 4.7g of placebo twice per day.
Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal Pain Responder Rate
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
An abdominal pain responder is a patient who meets the abdominal pain weekly responder criterion (i.e., an improvement of ≥30% from the baseline weekly average of the worst abdominal pain in the past 24 hours score to the weekly average during the intervention, in at least 2 out of 4 weeks). Abdominal pain at its worst (in the last 24 hours) is assessed daily by participants on an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents no abdominal pain and 10 represents very severe abdominal pain. Baseline of weekly abdominal pain will be the average between Week -2 and Week 0.
from baseline to Week 4
Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) Responder Rate
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
A CSBM responder is defined as a patient who meets the CSBM responder criterion (i.e., a mean increase of CSBM≥1/week compared with CSBM at baseline, in at least 2 out of 4 weeks). A spontaneous bowel movement (SBM) is defined as a bowel movement without laxative use in the preceding 24 hours. A CSBM is defined as a SBM that is associated with a sense of complete evacuation. Baseline of weekly CSBM will be the average between Week -2 and Week 0.
from baseline to Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the weekly average self-assessed daily maximum abdominal pain scores (0-10)
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
weekly average self-assessed daily maximum abdominal pain scores (0-10)
from baseline to Week 4
Change in the number of days of abdominal pain per week
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
weekly number of days of abdominal pain
from baseline to Week 4
Change in the average weekly Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) frequency
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
weekly Complete Spontaneous Bowel Movement (CSBM) frequency
from baseline to Week 4
Change in the average weekly Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM) frequency
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
weekly Spontaneous Bowel Movement (SBM)
from baseline to Week 4
Change in the score of Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity of Symptoms (IBS-SSS) questionnaire
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity of Symptoms (IBS-SSS), 0-500, Mild, moderate and severe cases are indicated by a score of 75 to 175, 175 to 300 and greater than 300, respectively.
from baseline to Week 4
Change in the score of Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM)
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM), It is five - grade (0-4)likert scale. The high scores indicate worsening severity of symptoms.
from baseline to Week 4
Change in the score of Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) questionnaire
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL). The PAC-QOL questionnaire is subcategorized to 4 items on physical discomfort, 8 items on psychosocial discomfort, 5 items on treatment satisfaction, and finally 11 items on worries and discomfort. Response choice is a Likert scale from 0 to 4. Higher scores mean higher negative effects on quality of life.
from baseline to Week 4
Safety: number of adverse events
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
Assessed by number of adverse events or side effects
from baseline to Week 4
Safety: the level of liver function (ALT, AST, AKP, GGT, TBIL, DBIL) and renal function (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine)
Time Frame: from baseline to Week 4
Assessed by liver and renal related index in blood samples
from baseline to Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The protocol, SAP, and de-identified data will be shared upon the researchers' request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

researchers' request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Constipation-predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe