- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06365736
The Effect of a Contemplative Nature-based Intervention on Spiritual Well-being
The Effect of a Contemplative Nature-based Intervention on Spiritual Well-being: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this randomized control trial is to test if contemplating in nature could benefit spiritual well-being in general adults. The main question it aims to answer is:
Does a 2-week contemplative nature intervention improve spiritual well-being?
Participants in the intervention condition will walk for 10 minutes and then choose a nice spot to sit for 10 minutes. During these minutes they will be asked to be silently present and observe trees, plants, flowers, or other aspects of nature and contemplate their connectedness to nature and their own awareness. Then walk back 10 minutes.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Overijssel
-
Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands, 7522NB
- University of Twente
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- is 18 years or older;
- has access to a nearby natural environment for walking and sitting activities such as a forest, park, or walking area;
- possesses the physical ability to walk for half an hour;
- has access to a computer or tablet with a stable internet connection and an email address;
- is willing to commit half an hour to engage in nature walks 10 times over 14 days.
Exclusion Criteria:
- NA.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Contemplative nature intervention
Participants will spend 30 minutes in nature per day for 10 times over 14 days.
Participants will walk for 10 minutes and then choose a nice spot to sit for 10 minutes.
During these minutes they will be asked to be silently present and observe trees, plants, flowers, or other aspects of nature and contemplate their connectedness to nature and their own awareness.
Then walk back 10 minutes.
|
Participants will spend 30 minutes in nature per day for 10 times over 14 days. Each time, participants will walk for 10 minutes and then choose a nice spot to sit for 10 minutes. During these minutes they will be asked to be silently present and observe trees, plants, flowers or other aspects of nature and contemplate their connectedness to nature and their own awareness. Then walk back 10 minutes.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spiritual well-being assessed by Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
On a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (to a very high degree), respondents rate in how far they think specific statements about spiritual well-being apply to themselves.
Higher scores indicate higher scores of spiritual well-being.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Spiritual well-being assessed by Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
On a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (to a very high degree), respondents rate in how far they think specific statements about spiritual well-being apply to themselves.
Higher scores indicate higher scores of spiritual well-being.
|
Change from Baseline to Short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Spiritual well-being assessed by Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
On a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (to a very high degree), respondents rate in how far they think specific statements about spiritual well-being apply to themselves.
Higher scores indicate higher scores of spiritual well-being.
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
|
Spiritual well-being assessed by Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
The non-theistic items from DSES will be used.
Ranging from 1 (multiple times a day) to 6 (never).
The item responses were reverse coded prior to analysis so that larger values would reflect a higher level of daily spiritual experiences.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Spiritual well-being assessed by Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
The non-theistic items from DSES will be used.
Ranging from 1 (multiple times a day) to 6 (never).
The item responses were reverse coded prior to analysis so that larger values would reflect a higher level of daily spiritual experiences.
|
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Spiritual well-being assessed by Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
The non-theistic items from DSES will be used.
Ranging from 1 (multiple times a day) to 6 (never).
The item responses were reverse coded prior to analysis so that larger values would reflect a higher level of daily spiritual experiences.
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Client satisfaction of intervention condition assessed by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
A Likert scale scored from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction).
Higher score means higher satisfaction with the intervention.
|
From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Client satisfaction of active control condition assessed by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
A Likert scale scored from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction).
Higher score means higher satisfaction with the intervention.
|
From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Client satisfaction of passive control condition assessed by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: From post-intervention to longer term follow-up at 3 months.
|
A Likert scale scored from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction).
Higher score means higher satisfaction with the intervention.
|
From post-intervention to longer term follow-up at 3 months.
|
|
Nature connectedness assessed by Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
Items are rated on a 5-point scale with endpoints 1 (strongly disagree) and 5 (strongly agree).
Higher score means higher sense of oneness with the natural world.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Nature connectedness assessed by Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
Items are rated on a 5-point scale with endpoints 1 (strongly disagree) and 5 (strongly agree).
Higher score means higher sense of oneness with the natural world.
|
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Nature connectedness assessed by Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
Items are rated on a 5-point scale with endpoints 1 (strongly disagree) and 5 (strongly agree).
Higher score means higher sense of oneness with the natural world.
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
|
Nature connectedness assessed by the single item Inclusion of Nature with Self scale (INS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
Participants were asked to select one of seven different sets of overlapping circles labeled ''self'' and ''nature.''
Scores ranged from 1 (where the circles touched but did not overlap) to 7 (where the two circles entirely overlapped).
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Nature connectedness assessed by the single item Inclusion of Nature with Self scale (INS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
Participants were asked to select one of seven different sets of overlapping circles labeled ''self'' and ''nature.''
Scores ranged from 1 (where the circles touched but did not overlap) to 7 (where the two circles entirely overlapped).
|
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Nature connectedness assessed by the single item Inclusion of Nature with Self scale (INS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
Participants were asked to select one of seven different sets of overlapping circles labeled ''self'' and ''nature.''
Scores ranged from 1 (where the circles touched but did not overlap) to 7 (where the two circles entirely overlapped).
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
|
Well-being assessed by Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
A 6-point Likert scale scored from "never" to "every day".
Higher score means higher level of well-being.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Well-being assessed by Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
A 6-point Likert scale scored from "never" to "every day".
Higher score means higher level of well-being.
|
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Well-being assessed by Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
A 6-point Likert scale scored from "never" to "every day".
Higher score means higher level of well-being.
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
|
Psychological well-being assessed by Brief INSPIRE-O
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot).
Higher score means higher psychological well-being.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Psychological well-being assessed by Brief INSPIRE-O
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot).
Higher score means higher psychological well-being.
|
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Psychological well-being assessed by Brief INSPIRE-O
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot).
Higher score means higher psychological well-being.
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
|
Stress assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
Higher score means higher level of perceived stress.
|
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
|
|
Stress assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
Higher score means higher level of perceived stress.
|
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
|
|
Stress assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often).
Higher score means higher level of perceived stress.
|
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ernst Bohlmeijer, Prof. Dr., University of Twente
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 240310
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
University of Vermont Medical CenterAvocado Nutrition CenterRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokersUnited States
-
Dragonfly TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult MaleAustralia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | StretchingItaly
-
Prevent Age Resort "Pervaya Liniya"RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy LifestyleRussian Federation
-
Yale UniversityNot yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | CholesterolUnited States
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Umm Al-Qura UniversityActive, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality | Healthy (Controls) | Poor Sleeping Quality | Healthy Adult Male Subjects | Health Adult SubjectsSaudi Arabia
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
PfizerNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy AdultsUnited States
-
Atisama TherapeuticsRecruitingHealthy | Healthy SmokerAustralia
Clinical Trials on Contemplating in nature
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyRecruiting
-
Duquesne UniversityEnrolling by invitationCaregivers | Acquired Brain Injury (Including Stroke)United States
-
University of KarachiCompletedPost Traumatic Stress DisorderPakistan
-
Michigan State UniversityUniversity of Maryland; Medical College of Wisconsin; University of Virginia; University... and other collaboratorsCompletedMental HealthUnited States
-
McGill UniversitySocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaCompleted
-
University of Vic - Central University of CataloniaBarcelona Institute for Global Health; Fundacio Salut i Envelliment UAB; Program...Active, not recruiting
-
University of HelsinkiFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare; Municipality of Sipoo, Health and... and other collaboratorsCompletedHealth Promotion | MultimorbidityFinland
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneTerminated
-
University of PennsylvaniaAmerican Heart Association; Pennsylvania Horticultural Society; United States... and other collaboratorsCompletedHealth, Subjective | Health Behavior | Environmental ExposureUnited States
-
University of TwenteCompletedGrief | Spiritual WellbeingNetherlands