The Effect of a Contemplative Nature-based Intervention on Spiritual Well-being

September 16, 2025 updated by: Xingjian Ruan, University of Twente

The Effect of a Contemplative Nature-based Intervention on Spiritual Well-being: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this randomized control trial is to test if contemplating in nature could benefit spiritual well-being in general adults. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does a 2-week contemplative nature intervention improve spiritual well-being?

Participants in the intervention condition will walk for 10 minutes and then choose a nice spot to sit for 10 minutes. During these minutes they will be asked to be silently present and observe trees, plants, flowers, or other aspects of nature and contemplate their connectedness to nature and their own awareness. Then walk back 10 minutes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

41

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Overijssel
      • Enschede, Overijssel, Netherlands, 7522NB
        • University of Twente

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • is 18 years or older;
  • has access to a nearby natural environment for walking and sitting activities such as a forest, park, or walking area;
  • possesses the physical ability to walk for half an hour;
  • has access to a computer or tablet with a stable internet connection and an email address;
  • is willing to commit half an hour to engage in nature walks 10 times over 14 days.

Exclusion Criteria:

- NA.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Contemplative nature intervention
Participants will spend 30 minutes in nature per day for 10 times over 14 days. Participants will walk for 10 minutes and then choose a nice spot to sit for 10 minutes. During these minutes they will be asked to be silently present and observe trees, plants, flowers, or other aspects of nature and contemplate their connectedness to nature and their own awareness. Then walk back 10 minutes.

Participants will spend 30 minutes in nature per day for 10 times over 14 days.

Each time, participants will walk for 10 minutes and then choose a nice spot to sit for 10 minutes. During these minutes they will be asked to be silently present and observe trees, plants, flowers or other aspects of nature and contemplate their connectedness to nature and their own awareness. Then walk back 10 minutes.

Other Names:
  • contemplative nature-based interventions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spiritual well-being assessed by Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
On a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (to a very high degree), respondents rate in how far they think specific statements about spiritual well-being apply to themselves. Higher scores indicate higher scores of spiritual well-being.
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Spiritual well-being assessed by Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Short-term follow-up at 1 month.
On a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (to a very high degree), respondents rate in how far they think specific statements about spiritual well-being apply to themselves. Higher scores indicate higher scores of spiritual well-being.
Change from Baseline to Short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Spiritual well-being assessed by Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List Short Form (SAIL-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
On a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) to 6 (to a very high degree), respondents rate in how far they think specific statements about spiritual well-being apply to themselves. Higher scores indicate higher scores of spiritual well-being.
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Spiritual well-being assessed by Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
The non-theistic items from DSES will be used. Ranging from 1 (multiple times a day) to 6 (never). The item responses were reverse coded prior to analysis so that larger values would reflect a higher level of daily spiritual experiences.
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Spiritual well-being assessed by Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
The non-theistic items from DSES will be used. Ranging from 1 (multiple times a day) to 6 (never). The item responses were reverse coded prior to analysis so that larger values would reflect a higher level of daily spiritual experiences.
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Spiritual well-being assessed by Daily Spiritual Experience Scale (DSES)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
The non-theistic items from DSES will be used. Ranging from 1 (multiple times a day) to 6 (never). The item responses were reverse coded prior to analysis so that larger values would reflect a higher level of daily spiritual experiences.
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Client satisfaction of intervention condition assessed by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
A Likert scale scored from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction). Higher score means higher satisfaction with the intervention.
From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Client satisfaction of active control condition assessed by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
A Likert scale scored from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction). Higher score means higher satisfaction with the intervention.
From post-intervention to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Client satisfaction of passive control condition assessed by Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
Time Frame: From post-intervention to longer term follow-up at 3 months.
A Likert scale scored from 1 (low satisfaction) to 4 (high satisfaction). Higher score means higher satisfaction with the intervention.
From post-intervention to longer term follow-up at 3 months.
Nature connectedness assessed by Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Items are rated on a 5-point scale with endpoints 1 (strongly disagree) and 5 (strongly agree). Higher score means higher sense of oneness with the natural world.
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Nature connectedness assessed by Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Items are rated on a 5-point scale with endpoints 1 (strongly disagree) and 5 (strongly agree). Higher score means higher sense of oneness with the natural world.
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Nature connectedness assessed by Connectedness to Nature Scale (CNS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Items are rated on a 5-point scale with endpoints 1 (strongly disagree) and 5 (strongly agree). Higher score means higher sense of oneness with the natural world.
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Nature connectedness assessed by the single item Inclusion of Nature with Self scale (INS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Participants were asked to select one of seven different sets of overlapping circles labeled ''self'' and ''nature.'' Scores ranged from 1 (where the circles touched but did not overlap) to 7 (where the two circles entirely overlapped).
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Nature connectedness assessed by the single item Inclusion of Nature with Self scale (INS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Participants were asked to select one of seven different sets of overlapping circles labeled ''self'' and ''nature.'' Scores ranged from 1 (where the circles touched but did not overlap) to 7 (where the two circles entirely overlapped).
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Nature connectedness assessed by the single item Inclusion of Nature with Self scale (INS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Participants were asked to select one of seven different sets of overlapping circles labeled ''self'' and ''nature.'' Scores ranged from 1 (where the circles touched but did not overlap) to 7 (where the two circles entirely overlapped).
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Well-being assessed by Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
A 6-point Likert scale scored from "never" to "every day". Higher score means higher level of well-being.
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Well-being assessed by Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
A 6-point Likert scale scored from "never" to "every day". Higher score means higher level of well-being.
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Well-being assessed by Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
A 6-point Likert scale scored from "never" to "every day". Higher score means higher level of well-being.
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Psychological well-being assessed by Brief INSPIRE-O
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot). Higher score means higher psychological well-being.
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Psychological well-being assessed by Brief INSPIRE-O
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot). Higher score means higher psychological well-being.
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Psychological well-being assessed by Brief INSPIRE-O
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (a lot). Higher score means higher psychological well-being.
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
Stress assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Higher score means higher level of perceived stress.
Change from baseline to post-intervention at 2 weeks.
Stress assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Higher score means higher level of perceived stress.
Change from baseline to short-term follow-up at 1 month.
Stress assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.
A 5-point Likert scale scored from 0 (never) to 4 (very often). Higher score means higher level of perceived stress.
Change from baseline to longer-term follow-up at 3 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ernst Bohlmeijer, Prof. Dr., University of Twente

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 240310

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Contemplating in nature

Subscribe