Use of Propofol as a Sedative Agent Versus Spinal Analgesia With Bupivacaine in External Cephalic Version (PropoSpinECV)

Randomized Clinical Trial of the Use of Propofol as a Sedative Agent Versus Spinal Analgesia With Bupivacaine in External Cephalic Version

External Cephalic Version (ECV) is a maneuver to modify fetal position in pregnant women with a non-cephalic presentation. Its objective is to achieve a cephalic presentation that allows for vaginal delivery with less risk than a vaginal breech delivery or a cesarean section. ECV is an effective technique to reduce the rate of cesarean sections and is recommended by the Spanish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (SEGO) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Cesarean Section Working Group. The WHO aims to reduce interventionism in childbirth globally and implement non-clinical measures to reduce the rate of unnecessary cesarean sections.

Despite Propofol is a sedative agent commonly used by anesthesiologist in countless ambulatory procedures in obstetric anaesthesia, it has been little studied in ECV, and its effect has not been compared with other commonly used agents such as remifentanil or spinal analgesia. The Obstetric Anesthesiology Section of the Spanish Society of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation recommends the use of locoregional analgesia in ECV.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This project involves a randomized clinical trial to compare the effect of sedation with propofol versus spinal analgesia in ECV. Therefore, the objectives of this study are:

  • To compare the effect of sedation with Propofol on the success rate of ECV compared to spinal analgesia.
  • To compare the effect of sedation with Propofol on the rate of complications of ECV compared to spinal analgesia.
  • To compare the effect of sedation with Propofol on the length of hospital stay of ECV compared to spinal analgesia.

Locoregional analgesia requires a longer hospital stay than sedation with Propofol and may mask an early diagnosis of complications after ECV, such as placental abruption, which is identified in the initial stages by intense abdominal pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

270

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Murcia
      • Murcia, Murcia, Spain, 30120
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntary participation.
  • Older than 18 years.
  • Non-cephalic presentation.
  • Desire to attempt a vaginal birth.
  • Normal blood count and coagulation prior to the intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 years old.
  • Multiple gestation.
  • Cephalic presentation.
  • Risk of fetal compromise.
  • Unexplained active bleeding.
  • Absolute contraindication for vaginal delivery (Placenta Previa)
  • 2 or more previous cesarean sections.
  • Previous myomectomy with entry into the uterine cavity
  • Maternal fever.
  • Thrombocytopenia (<85,000 platelets).
  • Maternal spinal anomaly.
  • Intolerance or allergy to Propofol or any of its components.
  • Intolerance or allergy to bupivacaine or any of its components.
  • Contraindication for intrathecal sedation or analgesia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sedation with propofol
Atropine 0.4 mg intravenous bolus and intravenous propofol will be administered through a continuous infusion with a target plasma concentration between 4-6 micrograms/mL maintaining a BIS between 65-75, following the protocol used by Sánchez-Romero J et al. (doi:10.3390/jcm11030489). For this, an intravenous infusion pump (Agilia SP TIVA ES, Fresenius Kabi AG, Bad Homburg, Germany) will be used. After the administration of propofol, a period of 3 minutes will be waited before starting the procedure to ensure the target plasma concentration.
Sedation with propofol
Active Comparator: bupivacaine
A combined spinal-epidural anesthesia technique will be performed with a spinal dose of 5-7.5 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine and 20 μg of intrathecal fentanyl, along with the placement of an epidural catheter, following the protocol used by Brogly N et al. in "Protocols of the Obstetric Anesthesia Section of SEDAR, 2021". After the administration of epidural anesthesia, a period of 3 minutes will be waited before starting the procedure to ensure effective anesthesia.
Spinal analgesia with bupivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
compare the success rate of external cephalic version
Time Frame: Up to 24 months.
Number of external cephalic version when Propofol is used as a sedative agent or spinal analgesia.
Up to 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ECV (external cephalic version) complication rate when using Propofol as a sedative agent or spinal analgesia.
Time Frame: Up to 24 months.
Number of complications
Up to 24 months.
rate of emergency cesarean sections in the first 24 hours after the procedure when using Propofol as a sedative agent or spinal analgesia in ECV.
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Number of emergency cesarean
Up to 24 months
postprocedural pain when Propofol is used as a sedative agent or spinal analgesia in ECV
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain consists of 9 items on which participants rate their perceived dizziness on a scale between 1 (no dizziness) and 10 (most dizziness) in different visual vertigo-inducing environments
Up to 24 months
rate of clinically relevant hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg or a 20% decrease from baseline SBP) when using Propofol as a sedative agent or spinal analgesia in ECV
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
number of episodes of hypotension hypotension
Up to 24 months
rate of nausea or vomiting when using Propofol as a sedative agent or spinal analgesia in ECV.
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
Level of nausea or vomiting in clinical history
Up to 24 months
angle of progression of fetal presentation as a predictor of ECV success.
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
angle of progression of fetal presentation
Up to 24 months
angle of progression of fetal presentation as a predictor of complications of ECV.
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
angle of progression of fetal presentation as a predictor of complications of ECV.
Up to 24 months
degree of tissue oxygenation of the placenta during ECV by analyzing a pilot sample with infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)
Time Frame: Up to 24 months
degree of tissue oxygenation
Up to 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 6, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy Complications

Clinical Trials on Sedation with propofol

Subscribe