Effectiveness of Visual-Behavioral Approach and Predictive Factors in Dental Exams for Children With Autism

June 18, 2024 updated by: Alfini Octavia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Effectiveness of Structural-Visual Model Behavioral Approach and Predictive Factors of Cooperativity and Compliance in Dental Examinations for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

The objective of the study are:

  1. Evaluating the effectiveness of the structural-visual model of behavioral approach on the compliance and cooperativity of children with ASD in dental examinations.
  2. Analyzing the association between the predicting factors and compliance in the step of dental examination.
  3. Analyzing the association between the predicting factors and cooperativity in dental examinations.

This study tested two hypotheses:

  1. Evaluating the effectiveness of the structural-visual model of behavioral approach on the compliance
  2. Evaluating the effectiveness of the structural-visual model of behavioral approach on cooperativity of children with ASD in dental examinations.

The participants will undergo the structural visual approach intervention, and the investigator will measure its effectiveness through four assessments: one pre-test and three post-tests.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a brain development disorder marked by issues in two main areas: communication and interacting with others; as well as rigid, repetitive, and stereotypical behaviors, hobbies, or activities. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is becoming more common every year, making it a major concern for most parents around the world, including those in Indonesia. One of the areas in Indonesia, Yogyakarta, also has to deal with this problem.

Studies have shown that a lot of kids with autism are afraid of things that don't make sense. Sensory issues are common in kids with ASD, which makes it hard for them to handle the sounds and sights in the dentist's office. As a result, these kids often show more behavioral problems, too much worry, and bad behavior at the dentist's office, which makes it very hard for the dentists to do exams and provide oral care. Researchers also think that this refusal to cooperate makes parents hesitant to take their autistic children to the dentist for regular checkups or treatments. This means that these kids don't get the dental care they need and have bad mouth health. Also, many studies show that kids with ASD are more likely than kids in the general population to have cavities, bad oral health, and periodontal disease.

To help people with behavior problems, you need to know about their other health problems, the type of ASD they have, any previous treatment they've had, their behavior, their social and communication skills, the medicines they take to control their behavior, any learning disabilities or mental retardation they may have, their heightened sensory perceptions, and their inability to apply what they have learned in other situations.

Notably, visual pedagogy is a structural-visual behavior method that is often used with kids who have ASD. People in Indonesia have looked into how to help kids with autism understand dental checks by using visual aids. However, these tests were not done in real centers with lots of kids and long wait times. With this and other reasons in mind, this study used a visual-structural method to help Indonesian kids with autism during dental checks. What they learned about kids and their families led them to make changes. The information can help dentists handle kids with ASD and guess how they will act during dental exams.

The intervention comprised seven behavior approaches in this research defined as follows:

A successive approach: An approach to familiarization with the unfamiliar environment of the simulated dental office.

Tell-Feel-Show-Do (T-F-S-D): A dental approach explained to the patient's treatment by telling the patient what would happen, what he felt or did, and what had been done.

Visual pedagogy: Introduced dentistry to autistic children through visual media, such as pictures and photographs.

Audiovisual modeling: A learning process through audiovisual media, such as video and animation.

In-vivo modeling: Learning new activities by watching them in front of the model.

Behavioral trials: A learning strategy conducted through practicing the recent activity by him/herself.

Auto-modeling: A learning process following the activity of editing pictures during the prior visit of the patient.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55252
        • Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Dental Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged between 6 and 18 years old (school-aged children in Indonesia).
  2. Good general health without physical disabilities.
  3. Cooperative parents/caregivers who provided informed consent to participate in the study.
  4. They reside in the same household as their parents/caregivers.
  5. Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) by a psychiatrist.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a. Had undergone training for dental examination in a dental setting. b. The dental approach could not be provided due to a lack of non-pharmacological behavior management or cooperative behavior.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: intervention of structural visual approach
  1. st visit): Intervensi: Successive approaches, T-S-F-D, visual pedagogy
  2. nd visit): Intervensi: Successive approaches, T-S-F-D, visual pedagogy, audio-visual modelling
  3. rd visit): Intervensi: Successive approaches, T-S-F-D, visual pedagogy, in vivo modelling
  4. th visit): Intervensi: Successive approaches, T-S-F-D, visual pedagogy, behavioral trials
  5. th visit): Intervensi: T-S-F-D, auto-modeling, behavioral trial

The intervention comprised seven behavior approaches in this research defined as follows:

A successive approach: An approach to familiarization with the unfamiliar environment of the simulated dental office.

Tell-Feel-Show-Do (T-F-S-D): A dental approach explained to the patient's treatment by telling the patient what would happen, what he felt or did, and what had been done.

Visual pedagogy: Introduced dentistry to autistic children through visual media, such as pictures and photographs.

Audiovisual modeling: A learning process through audiovisual media, such as video and animation.

In-vivo modeling: Learning new activities by watching them in front of the model.

Behavioral trials: A learning strategy conducted through practicing the recent activity by him/herself.

Auto-modeling: A learning process following the activity of editing pictures during the prior visit of the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance of dental step of examination
Time Frame: The duration of the research process spanned a period of 3 months. 1. The initial visit was pre-tested to assess the degree of cooperativity. 2. The second through sixth visits were conducted with a one-week gap. This is a visit for intervention, l

Compliance with dental step examination

These steps (a) through (j) were given scores from 1 to 10:

  1. Going into the dental room (score 1):
  2. Sitting down (score 2):
  3. Lying back in the dentist chair (score 3)
  4. Tolerating direct light on the face (score 4
  5. Mouth open wide and teeth showing (score 5)
  6. Being able to handle having your mouth touched with gloves on (score 6)
  7. Looking at yourself in the mirror (score 7)
  8. Check over with tooth explorer (score 8)
  9. Exam with bathroom mirror and tooth probe (score 9)
  10. Tooth blockage (score 10)
The duration of the research process spanned a period of 3 months. 1. The initial visit was pre-tested to assess the degree of cooperativity. 2. The second through sixth visits were conducted with a one-week gap. This is a visit for intervention, l
Cooperativity
Time Frame: The duration of the research process spanned a period of 3 months. 1. The initial visit was pre-tested to assess the degree of cooperativity. The second through sixth visits were conducted with a one-week gap. This is a visit for intervention, last

During pre- and post-tests, the Frankl Behavior Scale was used to measure how cooperative the kids were. According to Frankl (1962) and Klein (1999), the scale was split into four groups:

  1. Definitely Not Good The patient doesn't want to get treatment, cries, is scared, fights, and is very negative.
  2. Negative: Not wanting to get dental care, not following through, and having a negative attitude, but not too much.
  3. Good news The patients are willing to go to the doctor, don't mind any treatment, follow directions, and work together.
  4. Definitely positive Gets along well with the dentist, is interested in treatments, smiles, and seems to enjoy the situation.
The duration of the research process spanned a period of 3 months. 1. The initial visit was pre-tested to assess the degree of cooperativity. The second through sixth visits were conducted with a one-week gap. This is a visit for intervention, last

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD is not shared with other parties because it is in accordance with the statement submitted in the ethics submission.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Structural visual approach

Subscribe