- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06491797
Booster of the "More Time for Patients" Program
Booster of the "More Time for Patients" Program: a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if reactivating a hospital program called "Plus de temps au service des patients" (PTP) can improve the quality of pain management for patients and increase job satisfaction among healthcare professionals. The main questions this study aims to answer are:
- Does reactivating PTP improve the quality of pain management?
- Does reactivating PTP increase healthcare professionals' job satisfaction? In this study, researchers will compare the effects of reactivating the program immediately to reactivating it after a 3-month delay.
Participants in the trial are healthcare professionals who will:
- Select 2 or 3 elements of the program they believe would be most beneficial to reactivate in their hospital units.
- Implement the selected elements for 3 months.
- Complete job satisfaction and burnout questionnaires before and after the study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Thomas Agoritsas, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 0041 79 553 45 43
- Email: thomas.agoritsas@hug.ch
Study Locations
-
-
-
Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
- Geneva University Hospitals
-
Contact:
- Thomas Agoritsas, MD,PhD
- Phone Number: 0041 79 553 45 43
- Email: thomas.agoritsas@hug.ch
-
Contact:
- Delphine S. Courvoisier, PhD
- Phone Number: 0041 79 553 11 41
- Email: delphine.courvoisier@hug.ch
-
Principal Investigator:
- Thomas Agoritsas, MD,PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Delphine S. Courvoisier, PhD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Clement P. Buclin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion criteria for the units:
- Implementation of PTP finished at least 6 months previously
- Agreement to the study from both medical head of service and head of unit (IRES)
Inclusion criteria for healthcare professionals:
- Healthcare professionals >18 yo.
- Healthcare professionals working in a HUG service of medicine or surgery.
- Healthcare professionals include Physicians, Nurses, Assistant Nurses, Pharmacists, Physiotherapists and other physical therapists.
- Provided general informed consent.
Inclusion criteria for patients
- Patients hospitalised in one of the boosted units.
- Cognitive ability to provide satisfaction assessment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Immediate reactivation
Our intervention will be booster measure of the existing PTP elements that will be designed for each unit that has been randomized to the immediate intervention group.
The booster will consist in a reactivation through audit and feedback of 2-3 elements of the PTP program.
The selection of the elements to boost will be done locally in each unit through a coordinated discussion between representants of the PTP organization and representants of the unit's medical and nursing professionals.
This will create an adaptable intervention that will feature selected standards among the list of 36 existing standards.
The boost will be performed over 3 months
|
Our intervention will be booster measure of the existing PTP elements that will be designed for each unit that has been randomized to the immediate intervention group.
The booster will consist in a reactivation through audit and feedback of 2-3 elements of the PTP program.
The selection of the elements to boost will be done locally in each unit through a coordinated discussion between representants of the PTP organization and representants of the unit's medical and nursing professionals.
This will create an adaptable intervention that will feature selected standards among the list of 36 existing standards.
The boost will be performed over 3 months
|
|
No Intervention: Delayed reactivation
The control intervention will also be PTP as applied usually, in the control group before the application of the booster measure (applied delayed by three months).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timely delivery of appropriate analgesic
Time Frame: Timely is operationalized as maximum 6 hours before for reserve pain medication, and up to 1 hour after pain measurement for any medication appropriate to the level of pain.
|
Quality of pain management as recorded through the timely delivery of an appropriate level painkiller after any pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ≥4.
VAS score range from 0 to 10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worse pain imaginable.
|
Timely is operationalized as maximum 6 hours before for reserve pain medication, and up to 1 hour after pain measurement for any medication appropriate to the level of pain.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain VAS documentation
Time Frame: 12 hours
|
Patients stay will be divided in 12 hours segments and documentation will be considered adequate when 90% of the segments have at least 1 pain Visual Analog Scale score documented.
VAS score range from 0 to 10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worse pain imaginable.
|
12 hours
|
|
Patient satisfaction - Picker
Time Frame: 1 week after discharge for every patients.
|
Patient satisfaction is already routinely collected via continuous Picker satisfaction questionnaires.
They are sent one week after patient discharge to all patients with a valid email address.
|
1 week after discharge for every patients.
|
|
Patient satisfaction - daily
Time Frame: Every day from month 1 to month 3 corresponding to the period of study
|
Daily patient satisfaction is already routinely collected in a 3 level scale going from 1 dissatisfied to 3 fully satisfied.
Surveys are realized at the bedside, often by nurse assistant in the early afternoon.
|
Every day from month 1 to month 3 corresponding to the period of study
|
|
Healthcare professionals' satisfaction
Time Frame: Once before the reactivation and once after (month 1 and month 3)
|
Healthcare professionals' satisfaction will be evaluated using the satisfaction with work scale.
All item range from extremely dissatisfied to extremely satisfied.
|
Once before the reactivation and once after (month 1 and month 3)
|
|
Healthcare professionals' burnout
Time Frame: Once before the reactivation and once after (month 1 and month 3)
|
Burnout will be assessed using the Copenhagen burnout inventory.
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory is a three dimensions scale evaluating the personal, the professional and the relational components of burnout.
Each dimension is scored on a scale ranging from 0 to 100, 0 being no burnout and 100 being the maximum burnout.
|
Once before the reactivation and once after (month 1 and month 3)
|
|
Healthcare professionals' risk of turnover
Time Frame: Once before the reactivation and once after (month 1 and month 3)
|
Risk of turnover will be investigated by the following validated single item "If it were possible and you would keep a similar salary, would you like to change profession to take up another one or to keep the same profession but without patient care?"
Three answers are possible: "No, I do not want to", "Perhaps", and "Yes, I do want to"
|
Once before the reactivation and once after (month 1 and month 3)
|
|
Healthcare professional's absenteeism rate
Time Frame: At month 1, 2 and 3 corresponding to the period of study
|
If given consent by the participants, individual monthly absenteeism rate will be extracted from the human resources of the hospital.
For all others, absenteeism rate will be extracted aggergated at the unit level.
|
At month 1, 2 and 3 corresponding to the period of study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Thomas Agoritsas, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Geneva
- Principal Investigator: Delphine S. Courvoisier, PhD, University Hospital, Geneva
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- PTPBooster
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Clinical Encounter Quality
-
Pakistan Institute of Medical SciencesNot yet recruitingQuality of Life | Clinical Depression | Clinical AnxietyPakistan
-
University of British ColumbiaMinistry of Health, British ColumbiaNot yet recruitingQuality Improvement | Dentistry | Opioid | Clinical AuditCanada
-
University of Campinas, BrazilFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloCompletedUnderdosing of Local Anesthetics, Initial EncounterBrazil
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)CompletedOther Injury of Other Intra-abdominal Organs, Initial EncounterUnited States
-
Kayseri Education and Research HospitalCompletedAdverse Effect of Oral Contraceptives, Subsequent Encounter
-
Geisinger ClinicEnrolling by invitationHypertension | Quality Improvement | Clinical Decision Support | Choice BehaviorUnited States
-
Duke UniversityCompletedQuality of Healthcare | Population Health Management | Clinical Decision Support | Medical Informatics InterventionsUnited States
-
Fenerbahce UniversityNot yet recruitingClinical Reasoning | Quality of Nursing Care | Critical Thinking in Nursing | Pediatric Nursing PracticeTurkey
-
University of ChicagoWithdrawnFood Insecurity | Patient Satisfaction | Clinical Trial | Hunger | Caregivers | Health-Related Quality of Life
-
Claude Bernard UniversityCompletedPerformance Anxiety | Objective Structured Clinical ExaminationFrance
Clinical Trials on Immediate reactivation
-
University of PennsylvaniaNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedMemory ConsolidationUnited States
-
Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthCompleted
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedSleep | ConsolidationUnited States
-
University of Texas at AustinCompletedSocial Anxiety DisorderUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedSleep | ConsolidationUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityCompletedSleep | ConsolidationUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityRecruitingStrokeUnited States
-
Shenzhen Kangning HospitalScience and Technology Innovation Commission of Shenzhen MunicipalityNot yet recruiting
-
Shaanxi Normal UniversityNot yet recruitingPost-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) | Intrusive Memories of Traumatic Event(s)
-
University Hospital, GenevaCompletedSleep | Social Anxiety DisorderSwitzerland