The Efficacy and Safety of Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined With Platelet-rich Plasma for Infraorbital Neuralgia

February 19, 2025 updated by: Fang Luo, Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Effectiveness and Safety of Platelet-Rich Plasma Combined With Pulsed Radiofrequency to Treat Patients With Infraorbital Neuralgia

This is a multicenter, prospective, observational, propensity score matching, cohort, and assessor-blinded study designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of PRP injections combined with PRF treatment with PRF alone in patients with IONa who are responded poorly to conventional therapies and are reluctant to receive destructive therapies for seeking a better minimally invasive treatment strategy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Infraorbital neuralgia (IONa) is one of a rare but devastating type of facial pain and lack of current consensus on the management. Previously, we have proved the efficacy of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treatment of IONa. However, refractory patients have not received more ideal treatment until now. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), as supraphysiological concentration of platelets, can provide prolonged neuropathic pain relief with almost no complications. To date, the efficacy of PRP combined with PRF in the treatment of IONa has not yet been proved. We will conduct this multicenter, prospective, observational, propensity score matching, cohort, and assessor-blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRP combined with PRF in treating refractory IONa patients who were reluctant to receive destructive therapies.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100070
        • Recruiting
        • Fang Luo
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lu Liu, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Power Analysis and Sample Size (PASS) V.15.0 software (NCSS Corporation, Kaysville, UT, USA) is used to compute the sample size. The results indicate that a study with a power of 80% and two-sided statistical significance level (alpha) of 0.05 would require 64 participants each group. Considering 10% loss to follow-up and an additional 40% loss after propensity score matching, the total sample size of this study will be 237 patients. And we are planning to enroll 240 patients totally considering the convenience of sample collection and statistics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 18 to 75 years;
  2. Paroxysmal or persistent stabbing pain in the distribution area of the infraorbital nerve and positive response to diagnostic block (1 ml of 2% lidocaine) prior to treatment;
  3. NRS score≥7;
  4. Scheduled for PRF treatment for IONa;
  5. Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Platelet count <105*109/L, ongoing anticoagulation therapy or antiplatelets treatment, coagulation disorders or bleeding disorders;
  2. Severe cardiopulmonary or hepatorenal dysfunction;
  3. Infection at the puncture site; .
  4. Neuralgia secondary to tissue damage around the infraorbital foramen from causes such as maxillary sinusitis or tumor;
  5. History of destructive treatments such as radiofrequency thermocoagulation, chemical ablation, infraorbital neurectomy, infraorbital nerve avulsion, etc;
  6. History of mental disorders;
  7. History of narcotic drug abuse;
  8. Unable to cooperation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PRP+PRF
PRF procedure will be performed at first. Puncture point will be identified at the surface projection point of the infraorbital foramen on the affected side, and after reach the infraorbital foramen under the guidance of thin-slice CT (2 mm/layer, Somaton, Siemens Company, Munich, Germany). The radiofrequency electrode needle (PMK-21-100; Baylis Medical Inc.) will be inserted into the trocar after removal of the the stylet and confirmation of no bleeding or air when withdrawal using a syringe. The standard PRF mode will be initially set at 42℃, then the PRF output voltage will be gradually increased to the highest voltage the patient can tolerate, and the treatment will be continued for 360 seconds. After PRF, the PRF electrode needle will be removed and 2 milliliter PRP will be injected into the same puncture site through the trocar needle.
It is a observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of PRP combined PRF on IONa compared to PRF alone.
PRF alone
Puncture point will be identified at the surface projection point of the infraorbital foramen on the affected side, and after reach the infraorbital foramen under the guidance of thin-slice CT (2 mm/layer, Somaton, Siemens Company, Munich, Germany). The radiofrequency electrode needle (PMK-21-100; Baylis Medical Inc.) will be inserted into the trocar after removal of the the stylet and confirmation of no bleeding or air when withdrawal using a syringe. The standard PRF mode will be initially set at 42℃, then the PRF output voltage will be gradually increased to the highest voltage the patient can tolerate, and the treatment will be continued for 360 seconds.
It is a observational study to investigate the efficacy and safety of PRP combined PRF on IONa compared to PRF alone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The 1-year response rate
Time Frame: 12-month period
cases responding to treatment/total number of cases*100%
12-month period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate
Time Frame: at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
cases responding to treatment/total number of cases*100%
at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
Dosage of carbamazepine
Time Frame: at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
dosage of carbamazepine
at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
Numeric rating scale (NRS) score of pain
Time Frame: at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
0 representing no pain and 10 representing the most severe pain imaginable
at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
Patient satisfaction scores (PSS)
Time Frame: at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
0 point indicates unsatisfactory, while 10 points indicate the most satisfactory
at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
Adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: at 30minutes, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after treatment.
such as dizziness, facial swelling, facial ecchymoma, eye injury, infection, etc
at 30minutes, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after treatment.
Patients' quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation
evaluated by 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) scores,Response categories vary from 2 to 6 and can be transformed to scale scores ranging from 0 ('the worst') to 100 ('the best')
at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luo Fang, M.D., Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

not yet decided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe