Epidemiology of French Sexual Offenders. A Cross-sectional Study (ARAVS)

July 16, 2025 updated by: Hôpital le Vinatier

Epidemiology of Sexual Offenders. A Cross-sectional Study of Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Referral Platforms

The epidemiology of sexual offenders has been poorly studied in the literature. A retrospective and prospective study will allow for the examination of the clinical profile of sexual offense perpetrators, risk and recurrence factors, as well as psychiatric or medical treatment. Since 2015, the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region has 8 reference platforms for sexual offense perpetrators, offering personalized assessment according to criteria defined by the Regional Health Agency (ARS). After this assessment, a multidisciplinary meeting is organized to define a tailored care plan. This study, called ARAVS (Auvergne Rhone-Alpes Sexual Offenders), aims to conduct an epidemiological, clinical, and socio-demographic study of patients in these platforms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region, prompted by the Regional Health Agency (ARS), established a unique system of reference platforms starting in 2015, covering a large part of the region's territory. These platforms aim to provide comprehensive care for sexual offense perpetrators in addition to the support provided by the CRIAVS (Resource Centers for Professionals Working with Sexual Offenders). There are currently 8 active reference platforms in the region: in Bourg-en Bresse (Ain), Roanne (Loire), Saint-Etienne (Loire), Lyon (Rhône), Clermont-Ferrand (Puy-de-Dôme), Grenoble (Isère), Annecy (Savoie), and Valence (Drôme).

Given this context, it seems pertinent to implement a retrospective-prospective study of the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients treated in these reference platforms to better understand this population. These results will contribute to a better understanding of sexual offense perpetrators in France, as there is limited large-scale clinical data available, and will help tailor care tools to the population being treated in the region. Standardizing the use of common tools, which are currently being used heterogeneously, will also enrich the resources available to clinicians across all platforms by generalizing their use.

The coordinated organization of the reference platform network in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region constitutes a unique care network in France, conducive to a clinical analysis of patients and their care pathways. The project will thus allow for the study of care pathways, the clinical and social profile of sexual offenders, and the identification of risk factors for recurrence among patients based on the data collected.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Bron, France, 69678
        • Recruiting
        • CRIAVS - Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sabine Mouchet, Dr
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Tristan Gabriel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All sexual offenders who are part of the PFR and meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this study.

Description

All sexual offenders who are part of the PFR and meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate in this study.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adults (age ≥ 18 years).
  • Under injunction of care for a sexual offense.
  • Or Awaiting sentencing for a sexual offense.
  • Or Currently under legal proceedings for a sexual offense.
  • Or Under a legal obligation for care related to a sexual offense.
  • Or Falling within the scope of an alternative to incarceration for a sexual offense.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patient refusal to participate in the study.
  • Patients with physical or mental incapacity to complete the questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Risk of re-offending and associated factors of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027
Sexual offender recidivism risk will be assessed using Static99 scale. The Static-99 (Hanson & Thornton, 2000) is the most commonly used actuarial risk tool for estimating sexual offender recidivism risk.The risk assessment instrument Static-99R consists of ten items, where all but items 1 and 5 are dichotomous, resulting in 0 or 1 point being added to the total score. The total score, between -3 and 12, results in one out of five recommended risk levels: level I - very low risk (scores of -3 to -2), level II - below average risk (scores of -1 to 0), level III - average risk (scores of 1 to 3), level IVa - above average risk (scores of 4 to 5), and level IVb - well above average risk (scores of 6+).
From May 2024 to May 2027

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impulsivity of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Impulsivity will be assessed using the UPPS-P ( Impulsive Behavior Scale) scale. Participants are asked to consider acts/incidents during the last 6 months when rating their behavior and attitudes on a 4-point scale, in which 1-Agree strongly, 2-Agree some, 3-Disagree some, 4-Disagree strongly. This is a 59-item scale measuring 5 impulsivity components: negative urgency, positive urgency, lack of premeditation, lack of perseverance, and sensation seeking.Scores are presented for each of five subscales, plus a total impulsivity score.In addition to the raw scores, the mean is calculated for the items on each subscale, from 1 to 4, where 1 indicates that the respondent did not endorse impulsive answers, and 4 indicates a high level of self-reported impulsivity.
From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Cognition of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Cognition will be assessed using The Patient Competency Rating Scale (PCRS). The PCRS consists of 30 items, each scored on a scale of 1 to 5, making the total score range from 30 to 150. The higher scores indicate greater competency in the list of skills on the test.
From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Emotional status of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Emotional status will be assessed using theTAS-20 (Toronto Alexithymia Scale) scale. The TAS-20 is a self-report scale that is comprised of 20 items. Items are rated using a 5-point Likert scale whereby 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree. There are 5 items that are negatively keyed (items 4, 5, 10, 18 and 19). The total alexithymia score is the sum of responses to all 20 items.The TAS-20 uses cutoff scoring: equal to or less than 51 = non-alexithymia, equal to or greater than 61 = alexithymia. Scores of 52 to 60 = possible alexithymia.
From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Diagnosis of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Diagnosis will be assessed using the PCL-R scale (Psychopathy Checklist Revised). The scale includes 2 factors. Factor 1 is a measure of Emotional Detachment (e.g., superficial charm, manipulativeness, shallow affectivity, absence of guilt or empathy). Factor 2 is a measure of Antisocial Behavior (deviance from an early age, aggression, impulsivity, irresponsibility, proneness to boredom). There is also a total score. A total score of 10-19 diagnoses an individual as midly psychopathic. A score of 20-29 diagnoses them as moderately psychopathic. a score of 30-40 diagnoses them as severely psychopathic.
From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Cognitive distorsions of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 ((cross-sectional study)
Cognitive distorsions will be assessed using the bumby RAPE (BRS) and MOLEST (BMS) scales. The MOLEST scale is composed of 38 items and the RAPE scale is composed of 36 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The BMS consists of38 items with a range of total scores being a minimum of 38 and a maximum of 152, and the BRS consists of 36 items with a total score ranging from 36 to 144.
From May 2024 to May 2027 ((cross-sectional study)
Pedophilic Interests of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 ((cross-sectional study)
pedophilic interests will be assessed using the Revised Screening Scale for Pedophilic Interests (SSPI-2). The SSPI-2 score ranges from zero to five, with higher scores indicating sexual interest in children.
From May 2024 to May 2027 ((cross-sectional study)
Motivation of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 ((cross-sectional study)
Motivation will be assessed using the URICA (University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale) scale. This is is a 32 item self-report measure that includes 4 subscales measuring the stages of change: Precontemplation, Contemplation, Action, and Maintenance. Responses are given on a 5 point Likert scale ranging from (1=strong disagreement to 5=strong agreement), An overall readiness to change score is calculated using a weighted average of the four sub-scores, where 14 is the maximum possible score. A higher score corresponds to increased readiness to change
From May 2024 to May 2027 ((cross-sectional study)
Self-esteem of the participant
Time Frame: From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)
Self-esteem will be assessed using the Rosenberg scale. The scale ranges from 0-30. Scores between 15 and 25 are within normal range; scores below 15 suggest low self-esteem.
From May 2024 to May 2027 (cross-sectional study)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023-A01205-40

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychiatric Disorder

Subscribe