Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Tobacco Cessation Among Psychiatric Partial Hospital Patients

September 23, 2020 updated by: The Miriam Hospital

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Tobacco Cessation Initiated in a Psychiatric Partial Hospital

People with serious mental illness are three times more likely to smoke cigarettes than people without mental illness. People with mental illness are less likely to be successful in quitting smoking than those without mental illness. Therefore, the healthcare community needs to find ways to get people with mental illness treatment to help them stop smoking. This study explores whether a treatment, called acceptance and commitment therapy, which is an affective therapy for serious mental illness, can help patients with serious mental illness stop smoking. In particular, the investigators test whether patients will be interested in receiving acceptance and commitment therapy for smoking cessation in a psychiatric partial hospital (also known as a day treatment program), whether they are able to complete the treatment, and whether it will help them stop smoking compared to usual care. To test these research questions, 40 patients in the Rhode Island Hospital's psychiatric partial hospital will be recruited. Half of the patients will receive acceptance and commitment therapy to help them stop smoking (2 in person sessions, 5 telephone sessions) and half will receive usual care (2 in person sessions, electronic referral to the Rhode Island tobacco quit line). All participants will be offered the nicotine patch. All participants will complete a baseline survey and a follow-up visit at the end of treatment to measure whether they stopped smoking and whether they liked the treatment. The study will also measure how many participants completed the treatment sessions. If successful, this treatment model could be a way to get more patients with mental illness into treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: There is a significant disparity in tobacco use in that smokers with mental illness smoke at twice the rate of the general population, use more tobacco per day and are disproportionately affected by smoking-related disease. Few models exist for treating tobacco use in individuals with mental illness. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a treatment strategy that helps individuals accept discomfort while making value-guided change. It has been used successfully to treat psychiatric symptoms in people with serious mental illness (SMI) and is well-suited to treat smoking in people with SMI. Psychiatric partial hospitalization programs provide an opportunity to intervene on tobacco use in people with SMI. OBJECTIVE: This study tests the feasibility of offering an ACT-based smoking cessation treatment initiated in a psychiatric partial hospital program and continuing post-discharge. AIMS: The study has 3 aims: (1) To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of an ACT-based, partial hospital initiated, counseling intervention for smoking cessation. (2) To collect preliminary evidence of the efficacy (i.e., effect size estimates) of ACT-based counseling initiated in the partial hospital compared to usual care. (3) To explore of the effect of treatment condition (ACT vs. Usual Care) on ACT treatment targets. DESIGN: This study is a randomized design (n=40), where patients in an ACT-based psychiatric partial hospital will be offered up to 8 weeks of the nicotine patch and randomly assigned to either ACT care (n=20; two in-person ACT-based counseling sessions + 5 ACT-based telephone counseling sessions) or to Enhanced Usual Care (n=20; two in person medication management counseling sessions + referral to the state quit line). Outcomes assessed at end of treatment include: feasibility (percent of eligible patients who enroll, percent of patients completing treatment), acceptability (patient satisfaction ratings), safety (hospital readmissions, symptom exacerbation), efficacy (CO confirmed 7 day point prevalence abstinence at end of treatment) and ACT treatment targets (tolerance of discomfort, mindfulness and acceptance). SIGNIFICANCE: This study tests a treatment model for smokers with SMI, a group with particularly refractory smoking behavior. If successful, this model could be implemented broadly in psychiatric day treatment programs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • The Miriam Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be male and female
  • psychiatry partial hospital patients
  • current daily smokers

    -≥ age 18

  • have regular telephone access
  • able to read and write English

Exclusion Criteria:

-current use of tobacco cessation treatment (bupropion prescribed for a psychiatric indication will be permitted)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
2 in person and 5 telephone sessions of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for tobacco cessation plus up to 8 weeks of nicotine patch.
2 in person and 5 telephone sessions of acceptance and commitment therapy for tobacco cessation plus up to 8 weeks of nicotine patch
Active Comparator: Enhanced Usual Care
2 in-person sessions of tobacco cessation counseling, electronic referral to state quitline, up to 8 weeks of nicotine patch
2 in person sessions of tobacco cessation counseling, up to 8 weeks of nicotine patch, referral to state quitline.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of Recruitment: Proportion of Smokers Seen During the Partial Hospital Visit Who Enroll in the Study
Time Frame: Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
proportion of smokers seen during the partial hospital visit who enroll in the study
Through study completion, approximately 5 months.
Percentage of Counseling Sessions Completed
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.
number of scheduled counseling sessions completed
through study completion, an average of 7 weeks.
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: at study completion, an average of 7 weeks post-enrollment
The Client satisfaction Questionnaire, measures acceptability of the intervention to patients, minimum value=8, maximum value=32, higher scores indicate higher satisfaction (higher scores mean better outcome)
at study completion, an average of 7 weeks post-enrollment
Number of Participants Who Are Rehospitalized for Psychiatric Reasons
Time Frame: At study completion, an average of 7 weeks post enrollment
This is a simple count based on follow-up survey data of the number of participants who reported being hospitalized for a psychiatric reason following enrollment in the study.
At study completion, an average of 7 weeks post enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Are Abstinent From Tobacco
Time Frame: at study completion, an average of 7 weeks post enrollment
a simple count of those who have both a carbon monoxide value consistent with abstinence and self-reported abstinence. Expired carbon monoxide value of less than 6 parts per million was considered abstinent.
at study completion, an average of 7 weeks post enrollment
Kessler 6
Time Frame: Change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment
Kessler 6, global distress measure, minimum value=0, maximum value=24, higher scores = greater distress (worse outcome), this study measures the change in global distress between enrollment and study completion. The change in global distress score minimum value=-24, maximum value=24 (lower scores indicate a better outcome: a reduction in distress)
Change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Avoidance Inflexibility Scale
Time Frame: Change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment
The avoidance inflexibility scale is a 13-item self-report assessment in which respondents to consider how they respond to difficult thoughts that encourage smoking (e.g., "I need a cigarette", "I wish I could have a cigarette now!"), different feelings that encourage smoking (e.g., stress, fatigue, boredom, enjoyment, satisfaction, etc.), and bodily sensations that encourage smoking (e.g., "physical cravings or withdrawal symptoms").The Avoidance Inflexibility Scale measures smoking-related experiential avoidance, minimum score= 13, maximum score=65, higher score indicate more avoidance (worse outcome), the study outcome is the change between avoidance measured at baseline, and at study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment. Minimum score=-52, maximum score=52 lower scores = better outcome.
Change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment
Commitment to Quitting Scale
Time Frame: Change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment
Commitment to Quitting Scale, range 8-40, higher scores indicate greater commitment, commitment will be measured as the change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post enrollment.
Change between baseline and study completion, 7 weeks post-enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sandra Japuntich, Ph.D., Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Ernestine Jennings, Ph.D., The Miriam Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R03DA043596-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Only the Principal Investigator will give permission for the release of aggregated study data. No identifiable data will be released. Participants in the proposed research will be informed, during consent, that completely de-identified data (i.e., data that has been cleaned of all 18 types of HIPAA identifiers) will be available to other qualified researchers. Within 18 months of study completion, we will make datasets available to interested investigators who submit a written request to the PI. The only contingency on the use of the data will be that ethical guidelines be followed (e.g., only individuals who have completed a research ethics training course will have access to the data, the data will be stored securely). The NIH will be notified of transmissions of the data to interested investigators.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

within 18 months of study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

ethical guidelines for The Miriam Hospital will be followed (the investigator will have completed a research ethics training course and the data will be stored securely)

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tobacco Smoking

Clinical Trials on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Subscribe