Nutritional Education Program for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) (TIMA)

May 22, 2026 updated by: Ying-Cheng Lin, Taichung Veterans General Hospital

A Brief, Structured Online Nutritional Education Program is Effective in the Management of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Study Summary Title: Mediterranean Diet Intervention for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD): A Randomized Controlled Trial (The TIMA Study)

Introduction:

This trial, known as the TIMA (Taiwanese Mediterranean dietary intervention for MASLD) study, evaluated the clinical impact of a culturally adapted, online nutritional program.

Aims:

  • Primary Aim: Assess the impact of an iso-calorie Mediterranean diet compared to standard care on intrahepatic fat in MASLD patients.
  • Secondary Aims: Evaluate the effects on liver function tests, lipid profiles, HbA1c and insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-IR), noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis with transient elastography by Fibroscan, Framingham Risk Score (FRS), serum metabolites, quality of life (QoL), compliance and stool microbiome.

Study Design:

  • Type: 12-week, prospective, two parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.
  • Participants: MASLD patients with >5% hepatic steatosis diagnosed by MRI-PDFF, randomized into two groups: Mediterranean diet intervention and standard care.

Randomization:

  • Method: Computer-generated random numbers, 1:1 allocation.
  • Blinding: Radiologists and statisticians blinded to treatment assignment.

Intervention:

  • Mediterranean Diet Group: Specific dietary guidelines provided.
  • Standard Care Group: Simple lifestyle advice.

Compliance:

• Monitored through standardized questionnaires and T-MEDAS at each visit.

Assessments:

Reduction of hepatic triglyceride content by MRI-PDFF at baseline and week 12.

Conclusion: This trial aims to determine the effectiveness of a Mediterranean diet in reducing intrahepatic fat and improving related metabolic and microbiome parameters in MASLD patients compared to standard care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subject selection

a. Screening of potential subjects at the out-patient clinic Consecutive patients attending the hepatology of the Taichung Veterans General Hospital will be screened. Patients with features of fatty liver on ultrasound scan (bright echotexture, reduced ultrasound penetrance, and blurred vascular markings), magnetic resonance imaging will be screened after signing informed written consent. The screening procedure is described in section Screening.

Randomization Subjects meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized (1:1) to participate in an iso-calorie Mediterranean diet (MD) intervention or to receive simple lifestyle advice alone. Randomization is carried out through the use of computer-generated list of random numbers. Treatment assignment will be revealed in sealed envelopes.

Trial treatments

  1. Blinding Radiologists who evaluate the magnetic resonance image and physicians doing transient elastography by Fibroscan will be blinded to the treatment assignment.
  2. Dietary intervention program

Nutritionist Education Process:

  1. Utilize the Taiwan version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS), validated by our team (as shown below), dividing its 14 items into seven question groups. Based on previous studies, common scoring patterns among Taiwanese people, and factors likely to change with food provision (e.g., olive oil and nuts), the priority sequence for recommendations is as follows:

    I. Olive oil-related (Derived from items 1,2) II. Protein sources (Items 5,9,10,13) III. Nuts (Item 12) IV. Fruits and vegetables (Items 3,4) V. Sugary drinks and sweets (Items 7,11) VI. Cream (Item 6) VII. Quality of carbohydrates (Items 8,14)

  2. Before each educational session, collect the participant's MEDAS score and a three-day photographic food diary. Based on this data, determine the two to three question groups where the participant should prioritize improvement.
  3. Conduct online educational sessions at Weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9, lasting 15 to 20 minutes each, focusing on the relevant question groups. Tailor the education to the participant's dietary habits, such as the frequency and type of dining out, and provide two to three graphic-based suggestions after each session, highlighting key points for both dining out and home cooking.
  4. For the intake of olive oil, we recommend using a 15mL measuring cup or tablespoon, and suggest adding it to vegetable juice or drizzling it over vegetables. We intend to start with 30mL of olive oil and gradually increase it if the patients tolerate well after 3 to 6 weeks.
  5. The ultimate goal is to increase the MEDAS score by more than five points within 12 weeks without calorie restriction.
  6. After the initial education session, provide participants with a common Q and A sheet, online, based on the dietary advice given. We also provide education materials, a food-group list specifying preferred choices and approximate numbers and size of servings to consume per day.
  7. Conduct a 3-minute telephone interview within one week after each educational session to understand the participants' adherence and the challenges they face.

    7-1. To enhance compliance, mobile communication platforms will be utilized to send weekly text messages incorporating behavior change techniques (BCTs) from a structured message bank covering a range of relevant health topics, such as liver health, weight management, and blood glucose control.

  8. The investigators will provide an adequate amount of mixed nuts (15g per day) and extra virgin olive oil (60mL per day). The investigators will also provide an electronic scale.
  9. At the Week 0 and Week 6 follow-up appointments, lunch will be provided.

    c. Standard care: Simple lifestyle advice A 10-minute talk on the epidemiology of MASLD and balanced diet, resembling routine clinical practice.

    d. Compliance: At each scheduled visit, subjects completed a standardized compliance questionnaire and Taiwan version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS).

    e. Exercise: Subjects were advised to maintain their usual level of activity for the duration of the intervention f. Accessibility: All subjects received equivalent intensity of care in terms of opportunities for contact.

    Trial procedures

    1. Screening

      Screening will be performed for suitability of inclusion at the original clinic. Informed consent will be obtained prior to all screening assessment. After obtaining informed consent, the following screening will be performed:

      ● Verify inclusion/exclusion criteria.

      ● Record medical and medication history from the national insurance database.

      ● Physical examination including subject's height, weight, waist circumference, hip circumference.

      ● Clinical laboratory tests including complete blood count, prothrombin time, liver function, renal function, HBsAg, anti-HCV, ANA.

      • Items used for screening other liver diseases, such as viral hepatitis, autoimmune or cholestatic liver diseases, and Wilson's disease, that have been checked within the past year do not need to be rechecked during the screening process
      • Arrange Magnetic Resonance Spectrum (MRS) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF).
      • During the initial screening, the investigators hold a formal outpatient session to outline the benefits of the Mediterranean diet, presenting current evidence, and inquiring if patients are interested in dietary treatment. Physicians also evaluate participants' acceptance of olive oil during the session by serving a raw salad with olive oil dressing.
    2. Baseline randomization visit Randomization will be performed after the above procedure.
    3. Procedures and assessments after randomization ● The questionnaires to be obtained include: a Taiwanese version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (T-MEDAS), a validated food frequency questionnaire, the WHO Quality of Life (WHO QOL) questionnaire, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire ● Clinical lab tests include liver function, renal function, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, fasting glucose, HbA1c, lipid profile, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and insulin, serum metabolites, stool microbiome, and genetic analysis using the Taiwan Biobank (TWB) 2.0 SNP array. If the screening is within four weeks, a repeat blood test will not be required.

      • Subjects will obtain a 24-hour telephone to report any serious adverse events between the visits.

    Sample size calculation In a previous trial, 25% to 32.4% relative reduction in hepatic steatosis was achieved by Mediterranean diet for 12 weeks. Another trial showed 39% relative reduction in hepatic steatosis in those having Mediterranean diet for 12 weeks. A previous NAFLD study performed in Hong Kong, with a non-obese population, the mean intrahepatic fat was 11.0 ± 5.6%.7 Assuming that 28% relative reduction could be achieved in patients with Mediterranean diet intervention group. The investigators aimed to recruit 78 subjects (39 per group). Allowing for 10% dropout, this would provide 35 subjects per treatment group to detect diet-induced differences, based on a significance level of 5%, power of at least 80%.

    Statistical analysis a. Data analysis

    1. 1 Intention-to-treat population The intention-to-treat population includes all participants who have attended the randomization. The intention-to-treat population will be used for the endpoint analysis. Patients who withdraw from the study or refuse to have follow-up will be considered to have stationary intrahepatic fat.
    1. 2 Per-protocol population Those who have at least two visits, including the week 12 visit are included for the per-protocol analysis.

    a-3 Demographic data Randomized subjects will be included in the demographics characteristics analysis and the number and percentage was used for categorical variables, while mean, standard deviation was used for continuous variables.

    a-4 Analysis of the primary endpoint Analysis of the primary endpoint will be summarized by the difference between the intrahepatic fat levels for each treatment arm. The null and alternative hypotheses are: no difference between the intra-hepatic fat levels in each treatment arm at week 12.

    Comparison of the primary endpoint between the treatment groups will be performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to examine differences in outcomes between diet groups at week 12 after adjusting for baseline values. Statistical differences within groups were analyzed by paired t tests. Testing will be performed at a 5% significance level.

    b. Secondary endpoints Comparison of the treatment groups for all categorical secondary endpoints will be performed on the intention-to-treat population. ANCOVA will be used for continuous secondary endpoints. Testing will be performed at a 5% significance level. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be used for categorical variable. Testing for treatment group differences will be performed at a 5% significance level.

    d. Safety analysis All participants in the intention-to-treat population will be analyzed for vital signs, laboratory data and treatment related adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Taichung
      • Taichung, Taichung, Taiwan, 407219
        • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Willing to change diet for at least three months (accepting reduced sugar, less processed foods, reduced red meat, and following a Mediterranean diet with olive oil, high-fiber foods, vegetables, fruits, nuts, and legumes)
  • Intrahepatic triglyceride content (IHTG) of 5%
  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Fulfill the diagnosis of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
  • Baseline Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (T-MEDAS) score equal to or less than 5
  • Participants must not have initiated any new probiotic treatment in the past three months or must have been on a stable probiotic regimen for at least three months, which they are willing to continue for the duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other liver disease (viral hepatitis, autoimmune or cholestatic liver disease, Wilson's disease, hemochromatosis, or alpha-1 anti-trypsin deficiency)
  • Unstable body weight (variation >5% within the preceding 3-month period)
  • Current use of weight loss medications (e.g., Liraglutide)
  • Current use of pioglitazone
  • Unstable diabetes (HbA1c >8.5%)
  • Decompensated cirrhosis (international normalized ratio >1.3, platelets <100 × 109/mm, bilirubin >20 mmol/L, albumin <35 g/L, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy)
  • A serum creatinine level ≥ 2mg/dL
  • Presence of active cancer or undergoing chemotherapy either at present or in the prior three years
  • Major illness that might require hospitalization
  • Pregnancy or lactation for women
  • Participation in another trial
  • Chronic treatment with warfarin (given its interaction with vitamin K)
  • Being implanted with a pacemaker or platinum implant (due to inability to undergo magnetic resonance imaging included in the study design)
  • Alcohol consumption above 30 g per day in men or 20 g per day in women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mediterranean-diet intervention group

Dietitian-guided Nutritionist Education Process:

  1. Conduct online educational sessions at Weeks 0, 3, 6, and 9, lasting 10 to 15 minutes each.
  2. The ultimate goal is to increase the MEDAS score by more than five points within 12 weeks.
  3. After the initial education session, provide participants with a common Q and A sheet, online, based on the dietary advice given. Investigators also provide education materials, a food-group list specifying preferred choices and approximate numbers and size of servings to consume per day.
Dietitian-guided Nutritionist Education Process
Active Comparator: Standard care group
A 10-minute talk on the epidemiology of MASLD and balanced diet, resembling routine clinical practice.
A 10-minute talk on the epidemiology of MASLD and balanced diet, resembling routine clinical practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intrahepatic fat
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12
Change in intrahepatic fat by MRI at the end of week 12
Week 0 and week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stool microbiome
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Change in the alpha-diversity and beta-diversity of stool microbiome
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Alanine Aminotransferase
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Alanine Aminotransferase changes
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Level of HbA1c
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
HbA1c
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
HOMA-IR
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
insulin resistance (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-IR)
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
hepatic fibrosis (elastography)
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Changes in elastography measurement by fibroscan. The normal range for the elastography is between 2 to 7 kPa.
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Serum metabolites
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Changes in the amount of secondary bile salts. Tiny amounts of bile salts, up to 1 or 2 μg per ml, are present normally in the blood.
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale, is a 26-item instrument consisting of four domains. The scores are then transformed linearly to a 0-100-scale.
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Compliance
Time Frame: Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
Taiwanese version of the Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener
Week 0 and week 12; At the sixth and twelfth months after completion of the trial
intrahepatic fat
Time Frame: twelfth months after completion of the trial
Change in intrahepatic fat at the end of 1 year
twelfth months after completion of the trial

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ying-Cheng Lin, Bachelor, Taichung Veteran's General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all collected IPD, all IPD that underlie results in a publication will be shared

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Protocol and SAP will be published first when investigators start the trial. CSR and analytic code will be shared starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be available to qualified researchers affiliated with academic or research institutions for the purpose of conducting scientifically valid analyses. Requests for access must include a detailed research proposal outlining the objectives, methodology, and potential impact of the analysis. Access will be granted through a secure data-sharing platform, ensuring the protection of participant confidentiality.

Requests will be reviewed by an independent data access committee, which will evaluate proposals based on scientific merit, ethical considerations, and the potential to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field. Researchers must also agree to use the data solely for the approved analyses and comply with data protection regulations.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diet, Healthy

Clinical Trials on Mediterranean-diet intervention group

Subscribe