The Effects of Performing a Motor Imagery Task on Cortical Excitability During Acute Experimental Muscle Pain and Acute Itch

November 20, 2024 updated by: Silvia Lo Vecchio, Aalborg University

Investigation of the Neurophysiological and Psychological Aspects of Itch

The aim of this project is to determine the effects of performing a motor imagery task on cortical excitability during acute experimental muscle pain (induced by hypertonic saline), acute histaminergic itch (induced by histamine), and non-histaminergic itch stimulation (triggered by Cowhage). We hypothesize that motor imagery will counteract the alterations in cortical excitability observed during experimental muscle pain and both itch models.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Itch and pain share many similarities and dissimilarities in terms of the mechanisms and molecules involved. Many studies have been conducted to explain all the neurophysiological aspects involved in the pain process, and cortical adaptations have been provoked in healthy individuals using experimental pain models. Unfortunately, all these aspects still need to be clarified regarding itch. Has been previously demonstrated that motor imagery can counteracted the pain-induced decrease in corticospinal excitability observed during acute pain, and it has also been proposed as a potential intervention for individuals with pain to restore maladaptive neuroplasticity. However, whether motor imagery can similarly counteract the itch-induced cortical changes remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this project is to investigate whether motor imagery would counteract the reduction in cortical excitability during acute itch, similar to the effects observed in the context of acute pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Silvia Lo Vecchio
  • Phone Number: 21397785
  • Email: slv@hst.aau.dk

Study Locations

      • Gistrup, Denmark, 9260
        • Recruiting
        • Aalborg University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy men and women
  • 18-60 years
  • Speak and understand English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Drug addiction defined as any use of cannabis, opioids, or other addictive drugs
  • Previous or current history of neurological (e.g. neuropathy), immunological (e.g. asthma, immune deficiencies, arthritis), musculoskeletal (e.g. muscular pain in the upper extremities,), cardiac disorder (e.g., heart stroke), or psychiatric diagnoses (e.g. depression) that may affect the results
  • Current use of medications that may affect the trial, such as antihistamines, antipsychotics, and painkillers, as well as systemic or topical steroids
  • Skin diseases (e.g., atopic dermatitis, pruritus nodularis, eczema, psoriasis)
  • Moles, scars, or tattoos in the area to be treated or tested.
  • Consumption of alcohol or painkillers 24 hours before the study days and between these
  • Acute or chronic pain
  • Unable to pass the "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Adult Safety Screen" (subproject 1 and 2)
  • Contraindications to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) application (history of epilepsy, metal implants in head or jaw, etc.)
  • Presence of implanted hearing aids or metal implants on the face, including permanent makeup or tattoos
  • Participation in other trials within one week of study entry (four weeks in the case of pharmaceutical trials)
  • Lack of ability to cooperate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental:Healthy volunteers
A small drop of histamine dihydrochloride will be applied to a previously determined area on the volar forearm, followed by a prick through the drop
A bolus injection of hypertonic saline (7% NaCl) will be administered to the FDI muscle using a 1 mL syringe with a disposable needle (27G), and the volume of the bolus will be 0.1 mL
This insertion is conducted by forceps using a stereomicroscope, and 30-35 spicules are gently rubbed into a 1 cm diameter skin area.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) will be used to evoke motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in the muscle of interest and cortical responses (TMSevoked potentials - TEPs) in the motor cortex with a figure-eight-shaped cone coil.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scales (NRS)
Time Frame: 1 minute after every itch/pain induction

NRS are essentially VAS but have tick marks spaced every centimeter so as to create 11-point scale (from 0 to 10).

Subject can use these tick marks as a guide when they mark their severity on the scale.

1 minute after every itch/pain induction
Measuring cortical excitability (TEPs)
Time Frame: Baseline
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a figure-eight-shaped cone coil will be used to evoke cortical responses in the motor cortex. The resulting TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) will be collected using an electroencephalogram (EEG). This assessment will last for 7 minutes before inducing itch or pain.
Baseline
Measuring cortical excitability (TEPs)
Time Frame: During Itch/pain stimulation for 10 minutes
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a figure-eight-shaped cone coil will be used to evoke cortical responses in the motor cortex. The resulting TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) will be collected using an electroencephalogram (EEG). This assessment will last for 7 minutes during itch or pain. The pain or itch sensation will last 10 minutes.
During Itch/pain stimulation for 10 minutes
Measuring cortical excitability (TEPs)
Time Frame: During motor imagery task for 7 minutes
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a figure-eight-shaped cone coil will be used to evoke cortical responses in the motor cortex. The resulting TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) will be collected using an electroencephalogram (EEG). This assessment will last for 7 minutes during motor imagery task.
During motor imagery task for 7 minutes
Measuring cortical excitability (TEPs)
Time Frame: Post induction of itch or pain
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with a figure-eight-shaped cone coil will be used to evoke cortical responses in the motor cortex. The resulting TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) will be collected using an electroencephalogram (EEG). Similar to the baseline, this assessment will last for 7 minutes after itch or pain.
Post induction of itch or pain

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).
Time Frame: Baseline
The PCS assesses negative and exaggerated coping concerning anticipated or experienced painful stimuli. Thirteen items have to be answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale.
Baseline
Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory - Personality Questionnaire (RST-PQ).
Time Frame: Baseline
The RST-PQ contains the following subscales: the Fight-Flight-Freeze System (FFFS, 10 items), which represents a defensive factor related to active avoidance of adverse stimuli; the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS, 23 items), which represents a defensive factor related to anxiety and passive avoidance of adverse stimuli; and the Behavioral Approach System (BAS, 32 items), which reflects reward interest, goal-drive persistence, reward reactivity, and impulsivity. In total, 65 items have to be answered on a 4-point Likert-type scale
Baseline
The Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline
The PSQI consists of 19 items generating seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The seven component scores can be summarized in a global score ranging from zero to 21 with higher scores reflecting a worse overall quality of sleep
Baseline
Learned Helplessness Scale (LHS)
Time Frame: Baseline
The questionnaire consists of 20 items, and the participant's response to each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree (1) to strongly disagree (4).
Baseline
Positive And Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: Baseline
PANAS measures positive and negative affect dimensions. Twenty words are associated with the subject's current feelings and have to be rated on a 5-points Likert-type scale.
Baseline
Itch Catastrophizing Scale (ICS).
Time Frame: Baseline
The ICS assesses negative and exaggerated coping concerning anticipated or experienced itchy stimuli. Thirteen items have to be answered on a 5-point Likert-type scale.
Baseline
Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21)
Time Frame: Baseline
The questionnaire measures the magnitude of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of these three subscales consists of 7 questions answered using a 0-3 Likert scale, with 0 meaning "it did not apply to me", and 3 meaning "it applied to me very much".
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Histamine

Subscribe