Exploring the Possible Beneficial Impact of Non-invasive and Invasive Neuromodulation on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease During Different Ambulatory Complexities: An Electrophysiological and fMRI Study

August 19, 2024 updated by: China Medical University Hospital
Freezing of gait (FOG) stands out as a devastating symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD), where patients may become momentarily glued to the ground, rendering them incapable of walking efficiently. The pathogenesis of FOG remains uncertain but is likely attributed to functional perturbations in superficial cortical and deep locomotion regions. FOG tends to manifest more prominently during complex walking, such as turning, than during simple straight forward walking, and the reasons for this phenomenon remain unclear. Unfortunately, effective methods for overcoming this ambulatory issue has yet to be identified, and quantifying paroxysmal gait spells proves challenging with clinical rating alone; thus, a scientific tool is warranted. In this 3-year proposal, the investigators plan to address these challenges comprehensively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

First, the investigators aim to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for the identification and quantification of FOG episodes using Red-Green-Blue (RGB) and walkway pressure data. PD patients experiencing FOG will undergo a standardized walking protocol on the PKMAS System, acquiring simultaneous data from two angles of video recording and foot pressure. Labeled videos of FOG incidents will be inputted into an algorithm, Adaptive Fusion Algorithm for Spam Detection (AFSD), utilizing raw RGB data, optical flow data (DualTVL), and their combination for temporal segmentation.

Second, the investigators intend to pinpoint sources of FOG in PD patients through electrophysiological methods during unconstrained walking, employing a high-density 64-channel electroencephalographic ambulatory recording and motor imagery fMRI to delve into the pathophysiology of FOG under different ambulatory conditions. Effective connectivity among higher neural regions, including the basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cortical regions, will be explored. The resulting connectivity map will be overlaid with electric recording data to examine neurovascular coupling or uncoupling.

Third, the investigators plan to conduct non-invasive interventions (transcranial direct current stimulation: tDCS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound: MRgFUS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) to assess their impact on gait and FOG in PD patients. Motor imagery fMRI and electrophysiological investigations will be performed before and after treatment using the mentioned methods. Our multi-modal approach aims to unravel the complexities of FOG in PD patients, providing valuable insights and potentially benefiting those enduring the challenges posed by this debilitating symptom.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
        • Recruiting
        • China Medical University Hospital/Neuro Depart
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chon-Haw Tsai, PHD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients meet the diagnosis of PD based on the established consensus criteria
  2. Age above 20 years old and below 90 years
  3. For MRgFUS patients: a. At least one of the 3 cardinal symptoms (akinesia, tremor, rigidity) reaches an intensity of at least 2/4. b. Parkinsonian symptoms cannot be satisfactorily controlled by optimal pharmacological treatment including L-dopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs. c. stable medication for PD ≥ 30 days.
  4. DBS patients must meet Taiwan Health Insurance criteria: PD duration exceeding 5 years, positive response to levodopa (≥33% UPDRS motor score improvement), and presence of motor complications (e.g., wearing off, on-off, levodopa-related dyskinesia, or medically intractable tremor).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Congestive heart failure (Functional III or above) or advanced cancer with distant metastasis.
  2. PD at Hoehn and Yahr Stage 5.
  3. DBS exclusion criteria: overt dementia or major depression.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
In transcranial direct current stimulation, the sham stimulation will be 30s stimulation with ramp up and ramp off for 10s at 2.0 mA.
A consecutive 5-days course of tDCS will be delivered. In treatment group, true stimulation will be administrated and sham stimulation will be delivered in control group.
Experimental: real tDCS
In transcranial direct current stimulation, the constant current of 2.0 mA was applied to each site for up to 20 minutes.
A consecutive 5-days course of tDCS will be delivered. In treatment group, true stimulation will be administrated and sham stimulation will be delivered in control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Electroencephalogram recording before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Gait recording by 64 channels EEG device. Four different frequency bands ( theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) will be investigated. Variables in gait analysis: 1.Gait initiation, 2.Level walking, 3.Gait termination.
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Electromyography recording before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
The 4 pairs of leg EMG recording during 50 meters walking. The EMG signals will be filtered with a band pass ranging from 0.05 to 70 Hz. Variables in gait analysis: 1.Gait initiation, 2.Level walking, 3.Gait termination.
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Functional magnetic resonance images examination before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days after the end of the tDCS session
fMRI scan will be performed on a 3.0T MR imager to detect the brain BOLD signal change in FOG. When fMRI was conducted, four different video tapes will be presented to the subjects#1.normal walking, 2.normal turning, 3.FOG during forward straight walking and 4.FOG during turning.
baseline / 2 days after the end of the tDCS session
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III before and after the tDCS session UPDRS contains four parts, the third part of which is reported in this outcome.
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
UPDRS contains four parts, the third part of which is reported in this outcome. Part III is clinician-scored monitored motor evaluation (14 questions, ranges from 0=normal to 4= Severe). The scoring of Part III varies between 0-56. The higher score indicates the worse motor function. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in New freezing of gait questionnaire (NFOG-Q) before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
NFOG-Q contains three parts: in the first part, a video clip will be shown to the participants with PD and help to classify whether an individual is a freezer or non-freezer. The second and third part of the questionnaire is designed for freezers only. Par II (items 2-6, scores range between 0-19) assesses the severity of FOG according to the frequency and duration of the freezing episodes. Part III (items 7-9, scores range between 0-9) evaluates the impact of freezing on daily activities. The higher score indicates the worse freezing of gait. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Change in Gait and Falls Questionnaire (GFQ) before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Gait and Falls Questionnaire assesses freezing of gait severity in patients with Parkinson's Disease (16 questions, ranges from 0=normal to 4= Severe). The scoring varies between 0-64. The higher score indicates the worse motor function. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Tinetti's Mobility Index total score before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
The Tinetti's Mobility Index contains two parts, Part I is Balance tests (9 questions, scores range between 0-16) and Part II is Gait tests (7 questions, scores range between 0-12). The scoring of this scale varies between 0 and 28 (< 19 high fall risk, 19-24 medium fall risk, 25-28 low fall risk). Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMSQ)
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson's Disease is composed of 30 questions, divided into 9 parts: Cardiovascular including falls, Sleep/fatigue, Mood/cognition, Perceptual problems/hallucinations, Attention/memory, Gastrointestinal tract, Urinary, Sexual function and Miscellaneous. The scoring method is frequency x severity (higher scores = more disability, lower scores = less disability). Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Change in Berg Balance Scale before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Berg Balance Scale is clinician-scored monitored motor evaluation (14 questions, ranges from 0=normal to 4= Severe). The scoring varies between 0-56. The higher score indicates the worse motor function. Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
Change inParkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39) before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
PDQ-39 is composed of 39 questions, divided into 8 parts: mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), emotional wellbeing, stigma, social support, cognition, communication and physical discomfort. It assesses how often people affected by Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living. All questions range from 0 to 4 (0=never, 4=always). The scoring of this scale varies between 0-156. Negative change from baseline values indicate better quality of life rating.
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation

Subscribe