- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06505460
Exploring the Possible Beneficial Impact of Non-invasive and Invasive Neuromodulation on Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease During Different Ambulatory Complexities: An Electrophysiological and fMRI Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
First, the investigators aim to develop an artificial intelligence algorithm for the identification and quantification of FOG episodes using Red-Green-Blue (RGB) and walkway pressure data. PD patients experiencing FOG will undergo a standardized walking protocol on the PKMAS System, acquiring simultaneous data from two angles of video recording and foot pressure. Labeled videos of FOG incidents will be inputted into an algorithm, Adaptive Fusion Algorithm for Spam Detection (AFSD), utilizing raw RGB data, optical flow data (DualTVL), and their combination for temporal segmentation.
Second, the investigators intend to pinpoint sources of FOG in PD patients through electrophysiological methods during unconstrained walking, employing a high-density 64-channel electroencephalographic ambulatory recording and motor imagery fMRI to delve into the pathophysiology of FOG under different ambulatory conditions. Effective connectivity among higher neural regions, including the basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cortical regions, will be explored. The resulting connectivity map will be overlaid with electric recording data to examine neurovascular coupling or uncoupling.
Third, the investigators plan to conduct non-invasive interventions (transcranial direct current stimulation: tDCS, magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound: MRgFUS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) to assess their impact on gait and FOG in PD patients. Motor imagery fMRI and electrophysiological investigations will be performed before and after treatment using the mentioned methods. Our multi-modal approach aims to unravel the complexities of FOG in PD patients, providing valuable insights and potentially benefiting those enduring the challenges posed by this debilitating symptom.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Chon-Haw Tsai, PHD
- Phone Number: 15035 8864-22052121
- Email: 008079@tool.caaumed.org.tw
Study Locations
-
-
-
Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
- Recruiting
- China Medical University Hospital/Neuro Depart
-
Contact:
- Chon-Haw Tsai, PHD
- Phone Number: 15035 8864-22052121
- Email: 008079@tool.caaumed.org.tw
-
Contact:
- Bey-Ling Liu, Master
- Phone Number: 12003 8864-22052121
- Email: bebeydream@hotmail.com.tw
-
Principal Investigator:
- Chon-Haw Tsai, PHD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients meet the diagnosis of PD based on the established consensus criteria
- Age above 20 years old and below 90 years
- For MRgFUS patients: a. At least one of the 3 cardinal symptoms (akinesia, tremor, rigidity) reaches an intensity of at least 2/4. b. Parkinsonian symptoms cannot be satisfactorily controlled by optimal pharmacological treatment including L-dopa and other antiparkinsonian drugs. c. stable medication for PD ≥ 30 days.
- DBS patients must meet Taiwan Health Insurance criteria: PD duration exceeding 5 years, positive response to levodopa (≥33% UPDRS motor score improvement), and presence of motor complications (e.g., wearing off, on-off, levodopa-related dyskinesia, or medically intractable tremor).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Congestive heart failure (Functional III or above) or advanced cancer with distant metastasis.
- PD at Hoehn and Yahr Stage 5.
- DBS exclusion criteria: overt dementia or major depression.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Sham Comparator: sham tDCS
In transcranial direct current stimulation, the sham stimulation will be 30s stimulation with ramp up and ramp off for 10s at 2.0 mA.
|
A consecutive 5-days course of tDCS will be delivered.
In treatment group, true stimulation will be administrated and sham stimulation will be delivered in control group.
|
|
Experimental: real tDCS
In transcranial direct current stimulation, the constant current of 2.0 mA was applied to each site for up to 20 minutes.
|
A consecutive 5-days course of tDCS will be delivered.
In treatment group, true stimulation will be administrated and sham stimulation will be delivered in control group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Electroencephalogram recording before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Gait recording by 64 channels EEG device.
Four different frequency bands ( theta, alpha, beta, and gamma) will be investigated.
Variables in gait analysis: 1.Gait initiation, 2.Level walking, 3.Gait termination.
|
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Electromyography recording before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
The 4 pairs of leg EMG recording during 50 meters walking.
The EMG signals will be filtered with a band pass ranging from 0.05 to 70 Hz.
Variables in gait analysis: 1.Gait initiation, 2.Level walking, 3.Gait termination.
|
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Functional magnetic resonance images examination before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days after the end of the tDCS session
|
fMRI scan will be performed on a 3.0T MR imager to detect the brain BOLD signal change in FOG.
When fMRI was conducted, four different video tapes will be presented to the subjects#1.normal
walking, 2.normal turning, 3.FOG during forward straight walking and 4.FOG during turning.
|
baseline / 2 days after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III before and after the tDCS session UPDRS contains four parts, the third part of which is reported in this outcome.
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
UPDRS contains four parts, the third part of which is reported in this outcome.
Part III is clinician-scored monitored motor evaluation (14 questions, ranges from 0=normal to 4= Severe).
The scoring of Part III varies between 0-56.
The higher score indicates the worse motor function.
Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
|
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in New freezing of gait questionnaire (NFOG-Q) before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
NFOG-Q contains three parts: in the first part, a video clip will be shown to the participants with PD and help to classify whether an individual is a freezer or non-freezer.
The second and third part of the questionnaire is designed for freezers only.
Par II (items 2-6, scores range between 0-19) assesses the severity of FOG according to the frequency and duration of the freezing episodes.
Part III (items 7-9, scores range between 0-9) evaluates the impact of freezing on daily activities.
The higher score indicates the worse freezing of gait.
Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
|
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Change in Gait and Falls Questionnaire (GFQ) before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Gait and Falls Questionnaire assesses freezing of gait severity in patients with Parkinson's Disease (16 questions, ranges from 0=normal to 4= Severe).
The scoring varies between 0-64.
The higher score indicates the worse motor function.
Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
|
baseline / 2 days, 2 and 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tinetti's Mobility Index total score before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
The Tinetti's Mobility Index contains two parts, Part I is Balance tests (9 questions, scores range between 0-16) and Part II is Gait tests (7 questions, scores range between 0-12).
The scoring of this scale varies between 0 and 28 (< 19 high fall risk, 19-24 medium fall risk, 25-28 low fall risk).
Positive change from baseline values indicate improvement.
|
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (NMSQ)
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Non-Motor Symptoms Scale for Parkinson's Disease is composed of 30 questions, divided into 9 parts: Cardiovascular including falls, Sleep/fatigue, Mood/cognition, Perceptual problems/hallucinations, Attention/memory, Gastrointestinal tract, Urinary, Sexual function and Miscellaneous.
The scoring method is frequency x severity (higher scores = more disability, lower scores = less disability).
Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
|
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Change in Berg Balance Scale before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Berg Balance Scale is clinician-scored monitored motor evaluation (14 questions, ranges from 0=normal to 4= Severe).
The scoring varies between 0-56.
The higher score indicates the worse motor function.
Negative change from baseline values indicate improvement.
|
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
|
Change inParkinson's Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39) before and after the tDCS session
Time Frame: baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
PDQ-39 is composed of 39 questions, divided into 8 parts: mobility, activities of daily living (ADLs), emotional wellbeing, stigma, social support, cognition, communication and physical discomfort.
It assesses how often people affected by Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living.
All questions range from 0 to 4 (0=never, 4=always).
The scoring of this scale varies between 0-156.
Negative change from baseline values indicate better quality of life rating.
|
baseline / 4 weeks after the end of the tDCS session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CMUH112-REC2-213
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
Bar-Ilan University, IsraelRecruitingTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation | Transcranial Alternating Current StimulationIsrael
-
University Hospital, GrenobleUnknownHealthy | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Transcranial Direct Current StimulationFrance
-
Beijing Sport UniversityNot yet recruitingTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
NYU Langone HealthCompletedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationUnited States
-
Hebrew University of JerusalemCompletedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationIsrael
-
Arizona State UniversityNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationUnited States
-
United States Army Aeromedical Research LaboratoryCompletedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Active, not recruitingTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNational Science and Technology CouncilCompletedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTaiwan
-
Hôpital le VinatierTerminatedTranscranial Direct Current StimulationFrance
Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruitingStroke | Brain Connectivity | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | Motor Learning | Adaptation | Brain Structure | AnkleTaiwan
-
Medical University of South CarolinaEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Withdrawn
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)CompletedStroke | Nonfluent AphasiaUnited States
-
Federal University of ParaíbaCompleted
-
University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyActive, not recruitingSpinal Cord Diseases | Spinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
University of Campinas, BrazilUnknownEpilepsy IntractableBrazil
-
Dina Hatem ElhammadyUnknown
-
Federal University of ParaíbaUnknown
-
Beijing Sport UniversityNot yet recruitingTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)
-
WANG KAICompletedChronic Insomnia | Transcranial Direct Current StimulationChina