Astragalus for Symptomatic Alleviation in High-grade Lymphoma

July 14, 2024 updated by: Bnai Zion Medical Center

Efficacy and Safety of Astragalus for Symptomatic Alleviation in Patients With High-grade Lymphoma Treated With Chemotherapy: a Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial

Lymphoma is a malignant disease of the lymph nodes. There are different types of lymphoma: when some of the lymphomas are indolent and require only follow-up, in cases of aggressive lymphoma or indolent lymphoma with a burden of disease, treatment is necessary, which usually includes chemotherapy with or without biological drugs. These drugs often cause significant damage to the quality of life, various symptoms including exhaustion, neuropathic pain, nausea/vomiting, cognitive decline, as well as a drop in blood counts with serious life-threatening infections that cause a delay in the treatment date that may affect the prognosis.

Drug treatments for symptomatic relief and improvement in quality of life in patients with lymphoma are missing, with only a partial effect and involving side effects.

Astragalus (scientific name: Astragalus membranaceus, common name: Huang Qi) is a perennial flowering plant common in China with a long history of use in traditional Chinese medicine. It is given in various forms of root in combination with other herbs, medicinal soups and as tablets, capsules, solutions, ointments for local use, or subcutaneous or intravenous injection. In patients with oncological diseases, a systematic review (4 trials on a total of 342 patients) showed an improvement in nausea and vomiting as well as in the immune system in patients with colon cancer who received Chemotherapy. A meta-analysis of 27 studies on 1,843 patients with colon cancer also demonstrated a reduction in chemotherapy-induced nausea in patients who received a combination of astragalus with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. In another meta-analysis that included 45 trials on 3,236 patients with liver cancer, an improvement in 12-month survival was reported with products containing astragalus. In a randomized study of 136 patients with lung cancer, three treatment cycles with astragalus by injection in combination with chemotherapy (vinorelbine and cisplatin) resulted in a significant improvement in quality of life compared to the control group that received chemotherapy alone. Similar results found in 23 patients with metastatic malignancy receiving astragalus by injection in combination with chemotherapy. In addition, a study on 90 patients with advanced cancer showed an improvement in fatigue in patients who received astragalus. Also, a pilot study on 60 patients with breast cancer showed that intravenous administration of astragalus improved blood counts in patients who received it in combination with chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone. In patients with hematological malignancies, a study was conducted on 498 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and showed that the use of astragalus or plants containing astragalus was associated with improved survival compared to patients who did not receive it. In the context of lymphoma, a pharmacological study in vivo on animals with lymphoma showed that a combination of an astragalus-containing formula with adriamycin-type chemotherapy improved the effect of adriamycin for the treatment of B-cell lymphoma. Another study in patients who had completed conventional chemotherapy with Rituximab Cyclophosphamide Adriamycine Vincristine Prednisone (R-CHOP) for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showed that administration of a formula containing astragalus improved immune function and blood counts. Finally, a randomized placebo-controlled study showed that giving a formula containing astragalus to patients under R-CHOP chemo-immunotherapy as first line for diffuse large B cell lymphoma high risk significantly reduced the appearance of side effects from the treatment and improved response to the treatment chemotherapy compared to the control group.

Side effects attributed to astragalus include fatigue, weakness, headaches and hypotension, but in the cited studies and meta-analyses, no increase in the rate of side effects was found in the groups of patients who received this plant compared to the control groups, and no safety problems were described in the use of astragalus in combination with chemotherapy.

In light of the multitude of symptoms that affect the quality of life and adherence to treatment in patients with lymphoma receiving chemotherapy, and in light of the encouraging findings in the literature about symptomatic improvement as a result of combining astragalus during chemotherapy in various malignancies, the investigators aim to examine the effectiveness and safety of astragalus during the treatment of patients with high-grade lymphoma on symptomatic relief and adherence to chemotherapy in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Haifa, Israel, 3339419
        • Bnai Zion Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18
  • Diagnosis of high-grade lymphoma
  • Need to start treatment for lymphoma that includes chemotherapy as first line
  • Possibility to answer questionnaires once a month
  • Signing an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Taking up to a week before the randomization a drug with the potential for an interaction of major clinical significance with Astragalus according to a professional database
  • Administration of chemotherapy in the past
  • Significant disturbance in liver enzymes: Aspartate transaminase and/or alanine transaminase above 5 times the upper limit of normal
  • Significant renal dysfunction: glomerular filtration rate under 30 ml/min according to Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation
  • Active autoimmune disease
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Active participation in another interventional study
  • Psychiatric disorder with impaired cognitive qualifications

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo capsules that look similar to Astragalus capsules will be given to patients from the control group, between 4 and 8 capsules per day according to the researcher's assessment and tolerability. The duration of the treatment will be up to a month from the end of the chemotherapy treatment which usually lasts up to six months.
Experimental: Astragalus
Patients in the intervention group will receive capsules of the Astragalus plant (scientific name: Astragalus membranaceus, common name: Huang Qi) at an initial dose of 2 grams (4 capsules) per day with the option of increasing the dose to 4 grams (8 capsules) per day according to researchers' assessment and patient tolerance. The dose was determined by a focus group of 5 herbalists and according to data from the literature on oncology patients. The duration of the treatment will be up to a month from the end of the chemotherapy treatment which usually lasts up to six months.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality-of-life
Time Frame: From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
European Organization Research for Treatment of cancer core quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) questionnaire summary score which is calculated from the mean of 13 of the 15 quality-of-life (QLQ-C30) scales of the questionnaire = (Physical Functioning+ Role Functioning+ Social Functioning+ Emotional Functioning+ Cognitive Functioning+ 100-Fatigue+ 100-Pain+ 100-Nausea_Vomiting+ 100-Dyspnoea+ 100-Sleeping Disturbances+ 100-Appetite Loss+ 100-Constipation+ 100-Diarrhoea)/13. Scores range from minimum 0 to maximum 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptoms
Time Frame: From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCAW) questionnaire at end of treatment: two main concerns of the patient which are rated for severity using a simple numerical Likert scale 0-6 (0: not concerning at all; 6: very concerning).
From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
Fatigue
Time Frame: From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
European Organization Research for Treatment of cancer core quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) questionnaire fatigue score. Scores range from minimum 0 to maximum 100; a higher score represents a higher ("worse") level of fatigue.
From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
European Organization Research for Treatment of cancer core quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) questionnaire nausea&vomiting score. Scores range from minimum 0 to maximum 100; a higher score represents a higher ("worse") level of nausea and vomiting.
From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
Cognitive function
Time Frame: From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
European Organization Research for Treatment of cancer core quality of life (EORTC-QLQ-C30) questionnaire cognitive functioning score. Scores range from minimum 0 to maximum 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of cognitive functioning.
From baseline to end-of-treatment, up to 6 months
Severe neutropenia
Time Frame: Evaluated at day 10-13 of each cycle (each cycle is 14-28 days depending on chemotherapy protocol) during the study treatment (up to 6 months)
Frequency of severe neutropenia episodes defined as absolute neutrophil count under 0.5x10^9/L
Evaluated at day 10-13 of each cycle (each cycle is 14-28 days depending on chemotherapy protocol) during the study treatment (up to 6 months)
Packed cells transfusion
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Frequency of packed cells transfusion during the study treatment
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Use of Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF)
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Frequency of G-CSF use during the study treatment
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Infections
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Frequency of infections during the study treatment
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Hospitalizations
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Frequency of hospitalizations during the study treatment
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Compliance to chemotherapy
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Relative dose intensity (RDI) which is the ratio of delivered dose intensity (DDI) of chemotherapy with standard dose intensity (SDI) of chemotherapy = DDI/SDI
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Overall response rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Percentage of patients who have a partial response or complete response to the treatment of lymphoma
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Complete response (CR) rate
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Percentage of patients who have a complete response to the treatment of lymphoma
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years after end-of-study treatment: up to 2.5 years
The length of time during and after the treatment of lymphoma (first line) that patient lives and disease does not progress
Up to 2 years after end-of-study treatment: up to 2.5 years
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 years after end-of-study treatment: up to 2.5 years
The length of time during and after the treatment of lymphoma (first line) that patient lives
Up to 2 years after end-of-study treatment: up to 2.5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
According to report of adverse events, severe adverse events, drug interactions
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Economic analysis
Time Frame: Through the study treatment, up to 6 months
Calculation of quality-adjusted life years based on EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) scale. The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient indicates health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement.
Through the study treatment, up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ilana Levy Yurkovski, MD, Bnai Zion Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on High-grade Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Astragalus

Subscribe