Front-of-Package Nutrition Labels

December 13, 2024 updated by: Jason Block, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care

Online Randomized Experiment Evaluating Front-of-Package Nutrition Labeling Systems

The goal of this study is to determine whether certain front-of-package food labeling systems improve the healthfulness of consumers' grocery selections. US adults who are their households' primary shoppers will complete a shopping task in a naturalistic online grocery store. They will be exposed to different front-of-package food labeling systems and asked to shop for groceries. The online store will record participants' selections. Participants will also be asked to complete survey measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to determine whether certain front-of-package food labeling systems improve the healthfulness of consumers' grocery selections. The survey research company Cloud Research will recruit a sample of approximately 5,610 US adults ages 18+ who read and speak English and who are their households' primary grocery shopper.

Participants will complete a between-subjects online randomized experiment. They will be randomized to 1 of 6 front-of-package labeling systems: 1) positive labels, 2) spectrum labels, 3) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) high in labels, 4) FDA traffic light labels, 5) FDA high in labels plus positive labels, or 6) FDA traffic light labels plus positive labels. Participants will complete a shopping task in a naturalistic online grocery store. Participants will be instructed to shop as they usually would for items in the following categories: non-alcoholic beverages (e.g., juice, coffee, tea, soda, sports drinks, water), breads and baked goods, breakfast cereals, soups, boxed and frozen meals, and snacks (e.g., chips, crackers, nuts, applesauce, dried fruit). They will be given a budget based on average spending in these categories in a large supermarket chain. The store will record participants' selections. After completing the shopping task, participants will complete an online survey.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5638

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215-3325
        • Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Reside in the US
  • Can read and speak English
  • Are their household's primary shopper (do 50% or more of the grocery shopping for their household)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under the age of 18
  • Reside outside of the United States
  • Unable to complete a survey in English
  • Are not their household's primary shopper (do <50% of the grocery shopping for their household)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Positive Labels
Products that meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning 1 or more Guiding Star will display labels indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Good"), 2 stars ("Better"), or 3 stars ("Best"). The Guiding Stars rating system uses a patented algorithm to rate foods based on their nutrients and ingredients per 100-calorie serving of the food. Products that do not meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning stars will not display any new front-of-package label.
Products that meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning 1 or more Guiding Star will display labels indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Good"), 2 stars ("Better"), or 3 stars ("Best").
Experimental: Spectrum Labels
All products will display an expanded Guiding Stars label that shows an overall rating indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Poor"), 2 stars ("Fair"), 3 stars ("Good"), 4 stars ("Better"), or 5 stars ("Best"). The Guiding Stars rating system uses a patented algorithm to rate foods based on their nutrients and ingredients per 100-calorie serving of the food. Products that display 1-, 2-, or 3-star labels in the Positive Labels arm will display 3-, 4-, or 5-star labels, respectively, in the Spectrum Labels arm. The remaining products that do not earn stars in the Positive Labels arm will be divided in half based on their underlying Guiding Stars scores; the bottom half of these products will display 1-star labels and the top half of these products will display 2-star labels.
All products will display an expanded Guiding Stars label that show an overall rating indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Poor"), 2 stars ("Fair"), 3 stars ("Good"), 4 stars ("Better"), or 5 stars ("Best").
Experimental: FDA High In Labels
Products that contain high levels (i.e., ≥20% DV per serving) of saturated fat, sodium, or added sugars will display a label indicating which of these nutrients the product is high in. The investigators will use DVs of 20g for saturated fat, 2,300mg for sodium, and 50g for added sugars per FDA definitions.
Products that contain high levels (i.e., ≥20% DV per serving) of saturated fat, sodium, or added sugars will display a label indicating which of these nutrients the product is high in.
Experimental: FDA Traffic Light Labels
All products will display a "Nutrition Info" label showing whether the amount of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars in 1 serving of the product is low (<5% DV), medium (≥5 to <20% DV), or high (≥20% DV). "Low" will be shown in green, "Medium" in yellow, and "High" in red. The investigators will use DVs of 20g for saturated fat, 2,300mg for sodium, and 50g for added sugars per FDA definitions.
All products will display a "Nutrition Info" label showing whether the amount of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars in 1 serving of the product is low (<5% DV), medium (≥5 to <20% DV), or high (≥20% DV). "Low" will be shown in green, "Medium" in yellow, and "High" in red.
Experimental: FDA High In Labels Plus Positive Labels

Products that contain high levels (i.e., ≥20% DV per serving) of saturated fat, sodium, or added sugars will display a label indicating which of these nutrients the product is high in. The investigators will use DVs of 20g for saturated fat, 2,300mg for sodium, and 50g for added sugars per FDA definitions.

Additionally, products that meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning 1 or more Guiding Star will display labels indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Good"), 2 stars ("Better"), or 3 stars ("Best"). The Guiding Stars rating system uses a patented algorithm to rate foods based on their nutrients and ingredients per 100-calorie serving of the food.

Products that meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning 1 or more Guiding Star will display labels indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Good"), 2 stars ("Better"), or 3 stars ("Best").
Products that contain high levels (i.e., ≥20% DV per serving) of saturated fat, sodium, or added sugars will display a label indicating which of these nutrients the product is high in.
Experimental: FDA Traffic Light Labels Plus Positive Labels

All products will display a "Nutrition Info" label showing whether the amount of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars in 1 serving of the product is low (<5% DV), medium (≥5 to <20% DV), or high (≥20% DV). "Low" will be shown in green, "Medium" in yellow, and "High" in red. The investigators will use DVs of 20g for saturated fat, 2,300mg for sodium, and 50g for added sugars per FDA definitions.

Additionally, products that meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning 1 or more Guiding Star will display labels indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Good"), 2 stars ("Better"), or 3 stars ("Best"). The Guiding Stars rating system uses a patented algorithm to rate foods based on their nutrients and ingredients per 100-calorie serving of the food.

Products that meet Guiding Stars' criteria for earning 1 or more Guiding Star will display labels indicating their healthfulness using star ratings: 1 star ("Good"), 2 stars ("Better"), or 3 stars ("Best").
All products will display a "Nutrition Info" label showing whether the amount of saturated fat, sodium, and added sugars in 1 serving of the product is low (<5% DV), medium (≥5 to <20% DV), or high (≥20% DV). "Low" will be shown in green, "Medium" in yellow, and "High" in red.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthfulness of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess healthfulness of participants' grocery selections as the weighted average Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model score of the products the participants select in the shopping task, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model scores will be calculated for each product participants select. Products receive higher Ofcom scores when they contain lower calorie, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar density, higher protein and fiber density, and more fruits, vegetables, legumes, and nuts. The investigators will calculate the weighted average score across participants' selections, weighting by the number of servings participants select of that product. The Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate healthier products.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Guiding Stars scores of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess Guiding Stars scores of participants' grocery selections as the weighted average Guiding Stars score of the products the participants select in the shopping task, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Products receive higher Guiding Stars scores when they contain more healthier nutrients and ingredients including vitamins, minerals, fiber, whole grains, and omega-3s and fewer unhealthy nutrients and ingredients including saturated fat, trans fat, added sodium, added sugars, and certain additives. Higher scores indicate healthier products.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Number of items selected that are high in ≥1 nutrient of concern
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the number of items participants select that contain ≥20% DV of saturated fat, sodium, or added sugars. The investigators will use DVs of 20g for saturated fat, 2,300mg for sodium, and 50g for added sugars per FDA definitions. Higher counts will indicate a larger number of products selected were high in nutrients of concern.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Calorie density of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the weighted average calorie density of participants' grocery selections, calculated as the average kcal per 100g of the selected products, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Higher values will indicate higher calorie density.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Sugar density of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the weighted average sugar density of participants' grocery selections, calculated as the average grams of sugar per 100g of the selected products, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Higher values will indicate higher sugar density.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Sodium density of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the weighted average sodium density of participants' grocery selections, calculated as the average milligrams of sodium per 100g of the selected products, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Higher values will indicate higher sodium density.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Saturated fat density of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the weighted average saturated fat density of participants' grocery selections, calculated as the average grams of saturated fat per 100g of the selected products, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Higher values will indicate higher saturated fat density.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Fiber density of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the weighted average fiber density of participants' grocery selections, calculated as the average grams of fiber per 100g of the selected products, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Higher values will indicate fiber saturated fat density.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Protein density of participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the weighted average protein density of participants' grocery selections, calculated as the average grams of protein per 100g of the selected products, weighted by the number of servings in each product. Higher values will indicate higher protein density.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total calories selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total number of calories in participants' grocery selections, calculated as the sum of calories across all products selected. Higher values will indicate more calories selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total sugar selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total amount of sugar in participants' grocery selections, calculated as the sum of sugar selected across all products selected. Higher values will indicate more sugar selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total sodium selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total amount of sodium in participants' grocery selections, calculated as the sum of sodium selected across all products selected. Higher values will indicate more sodium selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total saturated fat selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total amount of saturated fat in participants' grocery selections, calculated as the sum of saturated fat selected across all products selected. Higher values will indicate more saturated fat selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total fiber selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total amount of fiber in participants' grocery selections, calculated as the sum of fiber selected across all products selected. Higher values will indicate more fiber selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total protein selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total amount of protein in participants' grocery selections, calculated as the sum of protein selected across all products selected. Higher values will indicate more protein selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total number of items selected
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total number of items participants select. Higher values will indicate more items selected.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Total spending on participants' grocery selections
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the total amount participants spent on their grocery selections in USD. Higher values will indicate greater spending.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Correct identification of healthier items
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess the likelihood that participants correctly identify which of a pair of products is healthier with 6 items (1 for each of 6 product categories: bread, beverages, cereal, meals, snacks, and soups). Responses will be coded as correct (1) if participants select the product with the higher Ofcom Nutrient Profiling Model score and incorrect (0) otherwise.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Noticing of front-of-package labeling systems
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess noticing of the front-of-package labeling systems with 1 item: "When you were selecting foods and beverages in the shopping task, did you notice any other nutrition labels next to the products, besides the Nutrition Facts Panel?" Response options will be "yes," "no," and "not sure." Responses will be coded as noticed (1) if participants select "yes" and not noticed (0) otherwise.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Use of front-of-package labeling systems
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess use of the front-of-package labeling systems with 1 item: "While you were shopping, did you use these other nutrition labels to decide foods and beverages to select?" Response options will be "yes" (coded as 1) and "no" (coded as 0).
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Thinking about health
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess thinking about health using 1 item: "When you were selecting foods and beverages in the shopping task, how much did you think about the overall healthfulness of the product? Response options range from not at all (1) to a great deal (5).
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Negative emotional reactions
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess negative emotional reactions using 5 items: "How much does this label make you feel…" "worried", "scared," "guilty," "ashamed", and "sad"? Response options range from not at all (1) to a great deal (5). The investigators will average the 5 items; higher average scores indicate stronger negative emotional reactions.
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Perceived helpfulness of the front-of-package labeling system
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess perceived helpfulness with 1 item: "How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement: These labels would help me choose healthier foods and beverages." Response options range from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Perceived understandability of the front-of-package labeling system
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess perceived understandability with 1 item: "How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is easy to understand the information in these labels." Response options range from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5).
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Perceived trustworthiness of the front-of-package labeling system
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess perceived trustworthiness with 1 item: "How much do you trust or distrust the information in these labels?" Response options range from completely distrust (1) to completely trust (5).
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
Public support for front-of-package labeling system
Time Frame: Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey
The study will assess public support for the front-of-package labeling systems with 1 item: "Would you oppose or support a policy requiring these labels on foods and beverages?" Response options range from strongly oppose (1) to strongly support (5).
Assessed from enrollment to end of one-time, 30-minute online study survey

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jason P. Block, MD, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care
  • Principal Investigator: Anna H. Grummon, PhD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 21, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1938853
  • R01DK115492 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Investigators will post de-identified individual participant data in a public repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Investigators will post IDP within 6 months of publication of manuscripts associated with the data generated in this study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data and code will be made publicly available.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dietary Habits

Clinical Trials on Positive Labels

Subscribe