- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06534931
Effects of a Thoracic Manipulation on Hip Adductor, Extensor, and Latissimus Dorsi Force in Those With Adductor Weakness
Effects of a High Velocity Low Amplitude Mid-Thoracic Spinal Segment Manipulation on the Force Output of the Hip Adductors and Extensors and the Latissimus Dorsi in Healthy Individuals With Unilateral Hip Adductor Weakness
The goal of this trial was to determine if a mid-thoracic high velocity low amplitude spinal manipulation improves force output in those with unilateral hip adductor weakness. The main aims were to determine if the intervention:
Improved hip adductor force and muscle activation immediately and 48 h post manipulation compared to a control group.
Improved gluteus maximus and latissimus dorsi force and muscle activation immediately and 48 h post manipulation compared to a control group.
Strength and muscle activation of the hip adductors, hip extensors (gluteus maximus), and shoulder extensors (latissimus dorsi) were measured prior to, immediate after, and 48 hours after receiving a high velocity low amplitude manipulation to the thoracic spine. The manipulation was performed by a licensed chiropractor.
A control group received a validated sham manipulation to the thoracic spine. Participants were blinded to group assignment.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Maine
-
Portland, Maine, United States, 04103
- University of New England
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unilateral hip adductor weakness, as assessed by manual muscle testing
- Pain free hip motion
- No contraindications to high velocity thoracic spine manipulation including:
Any known active cancer/ Metastatic Bone Cancer Osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disorders Signs of spinal cord compression Nerve root compression with increasing neurologic deficit Signs of Vertebrobasilar insufficiency/ cervical artery abnormalities Bleeding Diatheses Angina pectoris
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current pain in the adductor muscle group
- Past history of hip surgery
- Past history of hip fracture
- History of spine or rib fractures
- Psoas muscle group (hip flexor) weakness as determined by manual muscle testing
- Received a chiropractic manipulation in past week
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Manipulation
Those in the intervention group received a high velocity low amplitude manipulation to the mid-thoracic spine provided by a licensed chiropractor.
|
Participants were supine on a treatment table.
The chiropractor determined levels of apparent spinal dysfunction by means of static palpation.
Participants were then asked to curl forward and bring their knees to their chest as the chiropractor placed a fist just inferior to the targeted level, anywhere between the T4 - T10 vertebrae.
The participant was instructed to inhale and then exhale, at which point the chiropractor lowered the participant's torso back to the table and delivered a thrust using his body into his fist.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham
Those in the control group received a validated sham manipulation to the mid-thoracic spine.
The sham manipulation was done so that there was minimal downward force applied to the spine.
|
A previously validated physiologically inert manual procedure to the thoracic spine
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hip adductor force (weak limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Isometric force produced by the hip adductors in the weaker limb.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
|
Hip adductor muscle activity (weak limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Mean muscle activity during isometric contraction.
Measured with surface electrode and reported as a percentage of maximum activation.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Hip extension force (strong limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Isometric force produced by the hip extensors in the strong limb.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
|
Gluteus maximus muscle activity (strong limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Mean muscle activity during isometric contraction.
Measured with surface electrode and reported as a percentage of maximum activation.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
|
Hip extension force (weak limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Isometric force produced by the hip extensors in the weak limb.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
|
Gluteus maximus muscle activity (weak limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Mean muscle activity during isometric contraction.
Measured with surface electrode and reported as a percentage of maximum activation.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
|
Shoulder extension force (weak limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Isometric force produced by the shoulder extensors in the weak limb.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
|
Latissimus dorsi muscle activity (weak limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Mean muscle activity during isometric contraction.
Measured with surface electrode and reported as a percentage of maximum activation.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
|
Shoulder extension force (strong limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Isometric force produced by the shoulder extensors in the strong limb.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
|
Latissimus dorsi muscle activity (strong limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Mean muscle activity during isometric contraction.
Measured with surface electrode and reported as a percentage of maximum activation.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
|
Hip adductor muscle activity (strong limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
Mean muscle activity during isometric contraction.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention
|
|
Hip adductor force (strong limb)
Time Frame: Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Isometric force produced by the hip adductors in the strong limb.
Measured with a force transducer and reported in Newtons.
|
Pre intervention, immediatly post intervention, 48 hours post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Grindstaff TL, Hertel J, Beazell JR, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD. Effects of lumbopelvic joint manipulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
- Hegedus EJ, Goode A, Butler RJ, Slaven E. The neurophysiological effects of a single session of spinal joint mobilization: does the effect last? J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):143-51. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000003.
- Hillermann B, Gomes AN, Korporaal C, Jackson D. A pilot study comparing the effects of spinal manipulative therapy with those of extra-spinal manipulative therapy on quadriceps muscle strength. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006 Feb;29(2):145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.12.003.
- Botelho MB, Andrade BB. Effect of cervical spine manipulative therapy on judo athletes' grip strength. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jan;35(1):38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
- Fernandez-Carnero J, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Cleland JA. Immediate hypoalgesic and motor effects after a single cervical spine manipulation in subjects with lateral epicondylalgia. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Nov-Dec;31(9):675-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.10.005.
- Chilibeck PD, Cornish SM, Schulte A, Jantz N, Magnus CR, Schwanbeck S, Juurlink BH. The effect of spinal manipulation on imbalances in leg strength. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2011 Sep;55(3):183-92.
- Haavik H, Kumari N, Holt K, Niazi IK, Amjad I, Pujari AN, Turker KS, Murphy B. The contemporary model of vertebral column joint dysfunction and impact of high-velocity, low-amplitude controlled vertebral thrusts on neuromuscular function. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Oct;121(10):2675-2720. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04727-z. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
- Christiansen TL, Niazi IK, Holt K, Nedergaard RW, Duehr J, Allen K, Marshall P, Turker KS, Hartvigsen J, Haavik H. The effects of a single session of spinal manipulation on strength and cortical drive in athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Apr;118(4):737-749. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3799-x. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
- Holt K, Niazi IK, Nedergaard RW, Duehr J, Amjad I, Shafique M, Anwar MN, Ndetan H, Turker KS, Haavik H. The effects of a single session of chiropractic care on strength, cortical drive, and spinal excitability in stroke patients. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 25;9(1):2673. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39577-5.
- Niazi IK, Kamavuako EN, Holt K, Janjua TAM, Kumari N, Amjad I, Haavik H. The Effect of Spinal Manipulation on the Electrophysiological and Metabolic Properties of the Tibialis Anterior Muscle. Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;8(4):548. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040548.
- Niazi IK, Turker KS, Flavel S, Kinget M, Duehr J, Haavik H. Changes in H-reflex and V-waves following spinal manipulation. Exp Brain Res. 2015 Apr;233(4):1165-73. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4193-5. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
- Dishman JD, Ball KA, Burke J. First Prize: Central motor excitability changes after spinal manipulation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Jan;25(1):1-9.
- Lawrence MA, Raymond JT, Look AE, Woodard NM, Schicker CM, Swanson BT. Effects of Tibiofibular and Ankle Joint Manipulation on Hip Strength and Muscle Activation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 Jun;43(5):406-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.10.005. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
- Michener LA, Kardouni JR, Lopes Albers AD, Ely JM. Development of a sham comparator for thoracic spinal manipulative therapy for use with shoulder disorders. Man Ther. 2013 Feb;18(1):60-4. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
- Parkinson AO, Apps CL, Morris JG, Barnett CT, Lewis MGC. The Calculation, Thresholds and Reporting of Inter-Limb Strength Asymmetry: A Systematic Review. J Sports Sci Med. 2021 Oct 1;20(4):594-617. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.594. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ThoracicManip
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Muscle Weakness
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterCompletedFall Risk | Quadriceps Muscle Weakness | Adductor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Lactomason Co., Ltd.RecruitingAge-Related Muscle WeaknessSouth Korea
-
Healthbiome IncCompletedAge-Related Muscle WeaknessSouth Korea
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle WeaknessCyprus
-
Association Pro-arteActive, not recruitingWeakness, Muscle | AmyotrophiaFrance
-
University of Central ArkansasCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruitingPhysical Disability | Muscle Atrophy or Weakness | Muscle Loss | Physical Inactivity | Delirium in Old Age | Hospital Acquired Condition | Weakness, MuscleUnited States
-
Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase și Pneumoftiziologie...CompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Weakness Condition | CopdRomania
-
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Electrical Stimulation...Medical University of Vienna; European Union; Comenius University; Ministry of...CompletedMuscle Weakness Condition | Therapy EffectAustria, Slovakia
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterTerminatedMuscle Cramp | Statin Adverse Reaction | Weakness, Muscle | AcheUnited States
Clinical Trials on High velocity low amplitude thoracic spine manipulation
-
University of ManitobaCompletedChronic Neck PainCanada
-
Institut Franco Europeen de ChiropratiqueFrench chiropractic research fundCompletedManipulation, SpinalFrance
-
UConn HealthTexas Tech UniversityCompletedShoulder ImpingementUnited States
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompleted
-
Palmer College of ChiropracticCompleted
-
Universidad de CórdobaNot yet recruiting
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedDiabetes ComplicationsBrazil
-
Alabama Physical Therapy & AcupunctureLong Island UniversityCompletedCervicogenic HeadacheUnited States
-
Creighton UniversityNebraska Foundation for Physical TherapyCompletedAnkle SprainUnited States
-
Creighton UniversityCompletedChondromalacia Patellae | Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome | Anterior Knee Pain SyndromeUnited States