Diagnosis of Muscular Weakness Syndrome After a Stay in Intensive Care : Measurement by Ultrasound (FIBER)

February 15, 2022 updated by: Association Pro-arte

The objective is to diagnose earlier and more precisely the occurrence of a weakness neuromuscular syndrome at the end of intensive care, or within 28 days if the stay is longer than 28 days. The amyotrophy has been shown to be proportional to muscle strength in healthy subjects. The amyotrophy can be reliably evaluated by measuring the cross-sectional area of the right femoral muscle. The hypothesis is that amyotrophy measured by muscle ultrasound can allow an early and reliable diagnosis of neuromuscular weakness syndrome (NMWS), even though the measurement of the MRC score (the Gold Standard), has shown its limitations in intensive care in terms of reliability and delayed diagnosis.

Moreover, this syndrome is associated with a loss of functionality and a deterioration of long-term quality of life. One of the objectives is thus to determine if the muscular ultrasound allows a prediction of the occurrence of these alterations far from the intensive care.

Early rehabilitation has shown a benefit on mortality, duration of stay, mechanical ventilation and on functional alteration after intensive care. This is why an earlier and more precise means of diagnostic of this pathology is searched.

The target population is therefore patients from 18 to 80 years hospitalized in intensive care for prolonged stay (> 5 days), and prolonged ventilation (> 48H).

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Neuromuscular weakness syndrome post intensive care is a generalized muscular weakness with amyotrophy caused by the stay in the intensive care unit. This pathology is frequent, under diagnosed, increases the length of stay and mortality in intensive care and alters the functional status in the long term (mobility, autonomy, cognitive abilities). The gold standard is the MRC score. It must be under 48/60. But this means of diagnostic is unreliable and tardive (problem of voluntary cooperation, confusion, sedation).

This study allows the earlier diagnosis of neuromuscular weakness syndrome, by muscular ultrasound. Ultrasound of the right femoral muscle allows evaluation of the amyotrophy, which is related to the maximum muscular strength.

The early rehabilitation enable improved prognosis. This is an observational, prospective, single-center, blinded, observational study.

The objective is to determine the day of ultrasound examination with the highest diagnostic performance to predict with a maximum of specificity the occurrence of post-intensive care neuromuscular weakness syndrome, defined by an MRC score <48/60 at the end of intensive care or if the duration of stay exceeds 28 days on the 28th day of hospitalization in intensive care unit.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Chu Grenoble Alpes

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study concerns people admitted in intensive care unit, intubated and ventilated.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Predictable mechanical ventilation time of at least 48 hours
  • Patient intubated for less than 48 hours
  • Social security
  • Not opposing, or whose family does not object to this research

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuromuscular pathology
  • Amputation of one of the limbs
  • Central or peripheral neurological impairment impacting the realization of the MRC score
  • Orthopaedic trauma of the limbs or the pelvis preventing the achievement of an MRC score at the exit of resuscitation or by default at J28
  • Subject in exclusion period of another study
  • Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of the day of ultrasound examination having the highest diagnostic performance to predict with a maximum of specificity the occurrence of a neuromuscular weakness syndrome post-intensive care unit
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Two-to-two comparison of the AUCs of 3 ROC curves corresponding to 3 measurements by ultrasound of decreasing muscles between J1-J5, J1-J7 and J1-J10
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determination of the perfect threshold of muscular decrease allowing the prediction with the maximum of specificity of a post-intensive care neuromuscular weakness syndrome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Look for the 3 ROC curves corresponding to 3 measurements of ultrasound muscle reduction between J1-J5, J1-J7 and J1-J10, the optimal threshold for measuring the cross sectional area of the right femoral muscle
through study completion, an average of 1 year
comparison of the persistence of neuromuscular weakness into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
MRC score : Medical Research Council (muscular testing), from 0 to 5 for each muscular group, and from 0 (complete tetraplegia) to 60 (normal muscular strength) for the total. The 6 subscales are summed.
3 months after discharge from hospital
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
SF12 score (short form - 12) : quality of life questionnaire, range from 0 to 100. Each standardized data are summed
3 months after discharge from hospital
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
walk test of 6 minuts (Detect abnormalities of gas exchange during exercise)
3 months after discharge from hospital
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
Get up and Go test (evaluates sit-stand transfers, walking, and patient directional changes) : ranges from 1 (no instability) to 5 (very abnormal)
3 months after discharge from hospital
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
ADL score (autonomy scale) : ranging from 0 (dependant) to 6 (independent)
3 months after discharge from hospital
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
the Karnofsky index (description of the general condition of the patient) : from 0% (dead) to 100% (normal state)
3 months after discharge from hospital
comparison of mortality at discharge of intensive care unit into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: during hospitalization in intensive care, at hospital discharge, and 3 months after hospital discharge
mortality rate
during hospitalization in intensive care, at hospital discharge, and 3 months after hospital discharge
Comparison of length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
calculation of the length of stay
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of duration of mechanical ventilation, Optiflow, NIV, and number of days without ventilation into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
calculation of the duration of ventilation and no-ventilation
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Variation of albuminemia
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Variation of pre-albuminemia
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Variation of creatinine
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Variation of weight
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Variation of arm circumference
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Variation NUTRIC score ; ranging from 0 (low malnutrition risk) to 10 (the most likely to benefit from aggressive nutrition therapy).
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
Comparison of calorie intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Daily calorie intake
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the number of days with sedation in intensive care
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the number of days with curarization in intensive care
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the dose of opioids in intensive care
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: During stay in intensive care
the number of days with sedation and curarization in intensive care, the dose of opioids and the administration of corticosteroids in intensive care
During stay in intensive care
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
the administration of corticosteroids in intensive care
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 14, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There is not a plan to make IPD available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Weakness, Muscle

Subscribe