- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03735693
Diagnosis of Muscular Weakness Syndrome After a Stay in Intensive Care : Measurement by Ultrasound (FIBER)
The objective is to diagnose earlier and more precisely the occurrence of a weakness neuromuscular syndrome at the end of intensive care, or within 28 days if the stay is longer than 28 days. The amyotrophy has been shown to be proportional to muscle strength in healthy subjects. The amyotrophy can be reliably evaluated by measuring the cross-sectional area of the right femoral muscle. The hypothesis is that amyotrophy measured by muscle ultrasound can allow an early and reliable diagnosis of neuromuscular weakness syndrome (NMWS), even though the measurement of the MRC score (the Gold Standard), has shown its limitations in intensive care in terms of reliability and delayed diagnosis.
Moreover, this syndrome is associated with a loss of functionality and a deterioration of long-term quality of life. One of the objectives is thus to determine if the muscular ultrasound allows a prediction of the occurrence of these alterations far from the intensive care.
Early rehabilitation has shown a benefit on mortality, duration of stay, mechanical ventilation and on functional alteration after intensive care. This is why an earlier and more precise means of diagnostic of this pathology is searched.
The target population is therefore patients from 18 to 80 years hospitalized in intensive care for prolonged stay (> 5 days), and prolonged ventilation (> 48H).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Neuromuscular weakness syndrome post intensive care is a generalized muscular weakness with amyotrophy caused by the stay in the intensive care unit. This pathology is frequent, under diagnosed, increases the length of stay and mortality in intensive care and alters the functional status in the long term (mobility, autonomy, cognitive abilities). The gold standard is the MRC score. It must be under 48/60. But this means of diagnostic is unreliable and tardive (problem of voluntary cooperation, confusion, sedation).
This study allows the earlier diagnosis of neuromuscular weakness syndrome, by muscular ultrasound. Ultrasound of the right femoral muscle allows evaluation of the amyotrophy, which is related to the maximum muscular strength.
The early rehabilitation enable improved prognosis. This is an observational, prospective, single-center, blinded, observational study.
The objective is to determine the day of ultrasound examination with the highest diagnostic performance to predict with a maximum of specificity the occurrence of post-intensive care neuromuscular weakness syndrome, defined by an MRC score <48/60 at the end of intensive care or if the duration of stay exceeds 28 days on the 28th day of hospitalization in intensive care unit.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Grenoble, France, 38000
- Chu Grenoble Alpes
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Predictable mechanical ventilation time of at least 48 hours
- Patient intubated for less than 48 hours
- Social security
- Not opposing, or whose family does not object to this research
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neuromuscular pathology
- Amputation of one of the limbs
- Central or peripheral neurological impairment impacting the realization of the MRC score
- Orthopaedic trauma of the limbs or the pelvis preventing the achievement of an MRC score at the exit of resuscitation or by default at J28
- Subject in exclusion period of another study
- Persons referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the CSP
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Determination of the day of ultrasound examination having the highest diagnostic performance to predict with a maximum of specificity the occurrence of a neuromuscular weakness syndrome post-intensive care unit
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Two-to-two comparison of the AUCs of 3 ROC curves corresponding to 3 measurements by ultrasound of decreasing muscles between J1-J5, J1-J7 and J1-J10
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Determination of the perfect threshold of muscular decrease allowing the prediction with the maximum of specificity of a post-intensive care neuromuscular weakness syndrome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Look for the 3 ROC curves corresponding to 3 measurements of ultrasound muscle reduction between J1-J5, J1-J7 and J1-J10, the optimal threshold for measuring the cross sectional area of the right femoral muscle
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
comparison of the persistence of neuromuscular weakness into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
|
MRC score : Medical Research Council (muscular testing), from 0 to 5 for each muscular group, and from 0 (complete tetraplegia) to 60 (normal muscular strength) for the total.
The 6 subscales are summed.
|
3 months after discharge from hospital
|
|
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
|
SF12 score (short form - 12) : quality of life questionnaire, range from 0 to 100.
Each standardized data are summed
|
3 months after discharge from hospital
|
|
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
|
walk test of 6 minuts (Detect abnormalities of gas exchange during exercise)
|
3 months after discharge from hospital
|
|
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
|
Get up and Go test (evaluates sit-stand transfers, walking, and patient directional changes) : ranges from 1 (no instability) to 5 (very abnormal)
|
3 months after discharge from hospital
|
|
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
|
ADL score (autonomy scale) : ranging from 0 (dependant) to 6 (independent)
|
3 months after discharge from hospital
|
|
comparison of functional alteration into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: 3 months after discharge from hospital
|
the Karnofsky index (description of the general condition of the patient) : from 0% (dead) to 100% (normal state)
|
3 months after discharge from hospital
|
|
comparison of mortality at discharge of intensive care unit into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: during hospitalization in intensive care, at hospital discharge, and 3 months after hospital discharge
|
mortality rate
|
during hospitalization in intensive care, at hospital discharge, and 3 months after hospital discharge
|
|
Comparison of length of stay in intensive care unit and hospital into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
calculation of the length of stay
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Comparison of duration of mechanical ventilation, Optiflow, NIV, and number of days without ventilation into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
calculation of the duration of ventilation and no-ventilation
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
Variation of albuminemia
|
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
|
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
Variation of pre-albuminemia
|
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
|
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
Variation of creatinine
|
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
|
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
Variation of weight
|
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
|
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
Variation of arm circumference
|
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
|
Comparison of malnutrition into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
Variation NUTRIC score ; ranging from 0 (low malnutrition risk) to 10 (the most likely to benefit from aggressive nutrition therapy).
|
at intensive care discharge, within a limit of 28 days, at 3 months
|
|
Comparison of calorie intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Daily calorie intake
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the number of days with sedation in intensive care
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the number of days with curarization in intensive care
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the dose of opioids in intensive care
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
|
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: During stay in intensive care
|
the number of days with sedation and curarization in intensive care, the dose of opioids and the administration of corticosteroids in intensive care
|
During stay in intensive care
|
|
Comparison of drug intake into 2 cohorts of patients (probably not affected by the syndrome, and probably affected)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
the administration of corticosteroids in intensive care
|
through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3-2018-FIBER
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Weakness, Muscle
-
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital CenterCompletedFall Risk | Quadriceps Muscle Weakness | Adductor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Lactomason Co., Ltd.RecruitingAge-Related Muscle WeaknessSouth Korea
-
Healthbiome IncCompletedAge-Related Muscle WeaknessSouth Korea
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle WeaknessCyprus
-
University of Central ArkansasCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle WeaknessUnited States
-
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Electrical Stimulation...Medical University of Vienna; European Union; Comenius University; Ministry of...CompletedMuscle Weakness Condition | Therapy EffectAustria, Slovakia
-
Rutgers, The State University of New JerseyRecruitingPhysical Disability | Muscle Atrophy or Weakness | Muscle Loss | Physical Inactivity | Delirium in Old Age | Hospital Acquired Condition | Weakness, MuscleUnited States
-
Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infecțioase și Pneumoftiziologie...CompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Weakness Condition | CopdRomania
-
University of Central FloridaCompletedMuscle Weakness | Muscle Atrophy | Muscle Loss | Weakness, Muscle | Injury, KneeUnited States
-
Universidad Politecnica de MadridCompletedPelvic Floor Muscle Weakness | Muscle Tone | StrengthSpain