Effect of Internal Brace on Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction With BTB Autograft

March 3, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health

Effect of Internal Brace on Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction With Bone Patellar Bone (BTB) Autograft: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to assess Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) healing through analyzing clinical, radiographic, functional and patient-reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction with bone-tendon-bone autograft with and without internal bracing.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
        • Recruiting
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing ACLR with BTB autograft
  • Patients ages 18-35, inclusive
  • Ability to undergo standard rehab protocol and full, painless range of motion at the time of surgery of their operative knee

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoarthritis defined by Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or higher on preoperative weightbearing radiographs
  • Significant chondral injury as defined by grade 3-4 lesion greater than 2cm2
  • History of autoimmune or inflammatory disease
  • Prior ipsilateral knee ligament surgery or multi-ligament knee injury
  • Concomitant Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure
  • History of contralateral ACL surgery
  • Younger than 18 years of age
  • Older than 35 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Internal Brace
Patients will undergo ACL Reconstruction (ACLR) with an internal brace. Patients will undergo standard perioperative protocol and be followed at typical time points after surgery (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). At 12 months postoperative, a follow-up MRI will be obtained to evaluate healing and at 12 months and 24 months follow up KT-1000 testing will be conducted.
The Arthrex Internal Brace method for ACL reconstruction consists of suture tape used to reinforce the ACL during surgery. This suture tape is secured in place with bioabsorbable anchors that gradually degrade within the body over time.
Other Names:
  • AR-1593-BC
All patients will undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with or without an internal brace. ACLR technique will be standardized to standard anteromedial (AM) portal femoral drilling to ensure consistency between surgeons.
Active Comparator: Standard ACLR
Patients will undergo ACLR without an internal brace. Patients will undergo standard perioperative protocol and be followed at typical time points after surgery (2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months). At 12 months postoperative, a follow-up MRI will be obtained to evaluate healing and at 12 months and 24 months follow up KT-1000 testing will be conducted.
All patients will undergo ACL reconstruction (ACLR) with or without an internal brace. ACLR technique will be standardized to standard anteromedial (AM) portal femoral drilling to ensure consistency between surgeons.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Side to side difference in laxity as measured by the KT-1000 Arthrometer
Time Frame: Month 12 Post-Operation
The KT-1000 knee arthrometer (KT-1000) is an objective instrument to measure anterior tibial motion relative to the femur for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The side-to-side differences comparing the injured and normal extremity allow the determination of a diagnosis of increased anterior-posterior laxity. A side-to-side difference of less than 3mm at 30lb and the manual maximum is considered normal. A side-to-side difference between 3 and 5mm is considered a grey area. A side-to-side difference of more than 5mm is considered diagnostic of an ACL tear.
Month 12 Post-Operation
Side to side difference in laxity as measured by the KT-1000 Arthrometer
Time Frame: Month 24 Post-Operation
The KT-1000 knee arthrometer (KT-1000) is an objective instrument to measure anterior tibial motion relative to the femur for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The side-to-side differences comparing the injured and normal extremity allow the determination of a diagnosis of increased anterior-posterior laxity. A side-to-side difference of less than 3mm at 30lb and the manual maximum is considered normal. A side-to-side difference between 3 and 5mm is considered a grey area. A side-to-side difference of more than 5mm is considered diagnostic of an ACL tear.
Month 24 Post-Operation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline in Lysholm Knee Scoring System Score at Month 12 Post-Operation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 Post-Operation
The Lysholm Knee Scoring System is an 8-item assessment of the prevalence of knee problems. The total score ranges from 0-100; scores between 95 and 100 are regarded as exceptional, 84 and 94 as acceptable, 65 to 83 as fair, and less than 65 as poor.
Baseline, Month 12 Post-Operation
Change from Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - Pain Score at Month 12 Post-Operation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 Post-Operation
Participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); the response is the total score.
Baseline, Month 12 Post-Operation
Pivot Shift Grade
Time Frame: Month 12 Post-Operation

The Pivot Shift test is a dynamic, passive test to assess the rotational instability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the knee.

Pivot shift grades include: equal/0 (negative); glide/1; clunk/2; gross/3. A positive grade indicates injury to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Month 12 Post-Operation
Pivot Shift Grade
Time Frame: Month 24 Post-Operation

The Pivot Shift test is a dynamic, passive test to assess the rotational instability of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament in the knee.

Pivot shift grades include: equal/0 (negative); glide/1; clunk/2; gross/3. A positive grade indicates injury to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Month 24 Post-Operation
Change from Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - Pain Score at Month 24 Post-Operation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24 Post-Operation
Participants rate their pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable); the response is the total score.
Baseline, Month 24 Post-Operation
Change from Baseline in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Survey at Month 12 Post-Operation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 Post-Operation
This is a survey taken by patients to report how their knee is working for them. The IKDC is graded by adding the results and converting the result to a number on a scale from 0 to 100. Scores range from 0 (lowest level of function and highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Baseline, Month 12 Post-Operation
Change from Baseline in International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Survey at Month 24 Post-Operation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24 Post-Operation
This is a survey taken by patients to report how their knee is working for them. The IKDC is graded by adding the results and converting the result to a number on a scale from 0 to 100. Scores range from 0 (lowest level of function and highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
Baseline, Month 24 Post-Operation
Change from Baseline in Lysholm Knee Scoring System Score at Month 24 Post-Operation
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 24 Post-Operation
The Lysholm Knee Scoring System is an 8-item assessment of the prevalence of knee problems. The total score ranges from 0-100; scores between 95 and 100 are regarded as exceptional, 84 and 94 as acceptable, 65 to 83 as fair, and less than 65 as poor.
Baseline, Month 24 Post-Operation
Tegner Activity Level Scale
Time Frame: Month 24 Post-Operation

The Tegner activity level scale is a scale that aims to provide a standardized method of grading work and sporting activities. The Tegner activity level scale is a graduated list of activities of daily living, recreation, and competitive sports. The patient is asked to select the level of participation that best describes their current level of activity and that before injury.

A score of 0 represents sick leave or disability pension because of knee problems, whereas a score of 10 corresponds to participation in national and international elite competitive sports. A score >6 can only be achieved if the person participates in recreational or competitive sport.

Month 24 Post-Operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael J. Alaia, MD, NYU Langone Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24-00423

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health. Requests may be directed to Michael.Alaia@nyulangone.org. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The investigator who proposed to use the data will be provided access upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to Michael.Alaia@nyulangone.org. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ACL Reconstruction

Clinical Trials on Arthrex Internal Brace

Subscribe