Comparison of Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction With Peroneus Longus Autograft With and Without Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection.

March 10, 2026 updated by: Hafiz Sohail Ahmad, Lahore General Hospital

Comparison of Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction With Peroneus Longus Autograft With and Without Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This prospective RCT investigates if a single 4 ml intra-articular PRP injection improves knee function after ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus autograft. In Pakistan's resource-limited context, 88 patients (18-50 years) with isolated ACL tears receive either PRP or saline during surgery, then randomized equally. KOOS4 scores compared at 3, 6, and 12 months via ANCOVA (adjusted baseline, α=0.05). Positive results could establish affordable enhancement for recovery and guide practice in similar settings.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries impair knee function, particularly in young athletes, with many failing to regain pre-injury performance post-reconstruction (ACLR). Peroneus longus autografts offer comparable strength to traditional grafts with reduced donor site morbidity, but early recovery remains challenging. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may enhance graft healing, yet its efficacy with peroneus longus autografts is understudied, especially in resource-limited settings like Pakistan, where costly PRP methods are impractical. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates whether a single intra-articular PRP injection (4 ml, 2 ml per femoral/tibial tunnel) improves functional outcomes in ACLR with peroneus longus autograft. The hypothesis is that PRP will lead to superior knee functions. The study aims to compare KOOS4 scores at 3, 6, and 12 months between PRP and control groups. Eighty-eight patients (44 per group) aged 18-50 with isolated ACL tears will be randomized (1:1) to receive 4 ml PRP (from 15-20 ml blood, single-spin centrifugation at 3500 rpm) or saline during surgery at Lahore General Hospital. Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months will use validated KOOS4 questionnaires, integrated into clinic visits to ensure low dropout (10%). Data will be analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for KOOS4 scores (α = 0.05) in SPSS, adjusting for baseline differences. Improved KOOS4 scores with PRP could validate a cost-effective approach, enhance recovery and inform clinical guidelines in resource-constrained settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Age between 18 and 50 years. Diagnosis of a primary, complete ACL tear requiring reconstruction. Willingness to undergo arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft.

Active individuals participating in sports or regular physical activity. Willingness to provide informed consent and adhere to the study protocol, including follow-up visits and rehabilitation.

Ability to understand and complete study questionnaires. - Exclusion Criteria: Previous knee surgery on the affected limb. Concomitant ligamentous injuries requiring additional reconstruction (e.g., PCL, MCL, LCL Grade III).

Significant chondral damage (Outerbridge grade > 2 on pre-operative MRI or intra-operative assessment).

Pre-existing knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade > 2). Systemic inflammatory conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis). Bleeding disorders or coagulopathies. Current use of anticoagulants. Corticosteroid injection into the knee within 6 weeks prior to surgery. Pregnancy or lactation. Inability to comply with the rehabilitation protocol. Infection or history of infection in the affected knee. History of previous contralateral ACL injury (to isolate primary injury outcomes).

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intraarticular PRP Group
Intraarticular Platelet rich plasma injection
Platelets rich plasma from patients own blood
Placebo Comparator: Saline group
Normal saline group
Platelets rich plasma from patients own blood

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
KOOS4 score
Time Frame: 12 months
To compare knee-related functional outcomes, as measured by the KOOS4 score, between patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft and intra-articular PRP injection versus those undergoing ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft alone at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ACL Reconstruction

Clinical Trials on PRP injection

Subscribe