Medically Tailored Meals for Cardiovascular Health (MTM4CVH)

May 13, 2026 updated by: Nour Makarem, PhD, Columbia University

Enhancing, Culturally Adapting, and Expanding Medically Tailored Meals Programs to Address Cardiometabolic Multi-morbidity

This randomized clinical trial (RCT) will investigate novel approaches to enhance effectiveness, engagement, reach, and cost-effectiveness of medically tailored meals (MTM) programs for promoting cardiovascular health, focusing on economically disadvantaged New York City neighborhoods with a disparate burden of multiple cardiometabolic diseases. The main questions the RCT aims to answer are:

  1. Does enhancing MTM programs, with culturally relevant cardiovascular health curriculum (including educational sessions on heart health, healthy diet, cooking demonstrations, recipes, gift bags with healthy ingredients and fresh produce, and addressing social needs) enhance program engagement and effectiveness in improving short-term healthy eating behaviors and clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure) among individuals with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who currently qualify for MTM programs?
  2. Is the MTM program coupled with the cardiovascular health curriculum effective for improving healthy eating behaviors and clinical outcomes (HbA1c and blood pressure) among individuals with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who do not currently qualify for MTM programs and is a gradual reduction of MTM dosing an effective and sustainable approach for expanding reach of these programs?

To answer question 1, 66 participants with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who currently qualify for MTM programs will be randomized into a group that receives the standard MTM program (10 MTMs/week for 8 months) or a group that receives the standard program plus the cardiovascular health curriculum.

To answer question 2, 110 participants with type 2 diabetes and elevated to high blood pressure who do not currently qualify for MTM programs (due to not having advanced disease with complications) will be randomized into a group that receives the standard MTM program (10 MTMs/week for 8 months) plus the cardiovascular health curriculum or a group that receives standard MTM program for the first 3 months followed by a gradual reduction in dosing of the MTMs by 50% over the remaining 5 months plus the CVH curriculum.

All participants will have their HbA1c and blood pressure measured and complete questionnaires about their diet quality, health and lifestyle behaviors, and program engagement and implementation at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Medically tailored meals (MTMs) represent an integral in-kind intervention of the Food Is Medicine (FIM) initiative aimed at providing healthy food in a way that is integrated with the health care sector to prevent and manage chronic disease. MTMs are a promising approach to address diet-related cardiovascular inequities, because they collectively address food and nutrition insecurity, severe illness or chronic cardiometabolic disease, and challenges with activities of daily living such as shopping for or preparing meals in those with complex medical conditions. However, additional research is needed to determine how MTM programs could be enhanced to become more culturally and contextually responsive, increase engagement with these programs, enhance their effectiveness and sustainability, and expand their reach.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

176

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

For Cohort A (Individuals who currently qualify for MTMs)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Qualifying type 2 diabetes diagnosis (typically physician referred to the program due to more advanced disease with uncontrolled diabetes and complications)
  2. Hypertension diagnosis (systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 80 mmHg) or elevated blood pressure (defined as systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 120 mmHg)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cancer diagnosis
  2. Undergoing cancer treatment
  3. Non-English or non-Spanish speaking
  4. Not cognitively able to complete study requirements
  5. Severe psychiatric disorders
  6. Inability to provide informed consent
  7. Health conditions that could prevent safe participation or impact study outcomes (e.g., substance use disorder, dialysis, neurodegenerative conditions)

For Cohort B (Individuals who do not currently qualify for MTMs)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Type 2 diabetes diagnosis (physician diagnosed or HbA1c greater than or equal to 6.5% or diabetes medication use)
  2. Hypertension diagnosis (systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 80 mmHg or physician diagnosis or hypertension medication use) or elevated blood pressure (defined as systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 120 mmHg)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cancer diagnosis
  2. Undergoing cancer treatment
  3. Non-English or non-Spanish speaking
  4. Not cognitively able to complete study requirements
  5. Severe psychiatric disorders
  6. Inability to provide informed consent
  7. Health conditions that could prevent safe participation or impact study outcomes (e.g., substance use disorder, dialysis, neurodegenerative conditions)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1: Cohort A (type 2 diabetes patients who currently qualify for MTMs) Active Comparator
Participants in this arm are type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension or elevated blood pressure who currently qualify for medically tailored meals (MTMs). This arm will receive God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of 10 home-delivered MTMs per week and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period.
God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of weekly home-delivered MTMs and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period. The Food is Medicine Coalition Clinical Committee establishes and regularly updates the MTM Nutrition Standards, which catalogue the nutrition quality of this evidence-based intervention. Arms 1-3 will receive 10 MTMs per week for 8 months. Arm 4 will receive a distinct dosing down approach as follows: 10 MTMs/week in months 1-3, 9 MTMs/week in month 4, 8 MTMs/week in month 5, 7 MTMs/week in month 6, 6 MTMs/week in month 7, and 5 MTMs/week in month 8.
Experimental: Arm 2: Cohort A (type 2 diabetes patients who currently qualify for MTMs) Intervention
Participants in this arm are type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension or elevated blood pressure who currently qualify for medically tailored meals (MTMs). This arm will receive God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of 10 home-delivered MTMs per week and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period (same as Arm 1). In addition, they will receive a culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program that consists of didactic sessions focused on lifestyle change and the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework, setting weekly specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals for health behavior modification, group coaching, cooking demonstrations, recipes and gift bags with healthy ingredients, and addressing social needs.
God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of weekly home-delivered MTMs and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period. The Food is Medicine Coalition Clinical Committee establishes and regularly updates the MTM Nutrition Standards, which catalogue the nutrition quality of this evidence-based intervention. Arms 1-3 will receive 10 MTMs per week for 8 months. Arm 4 will receive a distinct dosing down approach as follows: 10 MTMs/week in months 1-3, 9 MTMs/week in month 4, 8 MTMs/week in month 5, 7 MTMs/week in month 6, 6 MTMs/week in month 7, and 5 MTMs/week in month 8.
Culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program that consists of didactic sessions focused on lifestyle change and the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework, setting weekly specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals for health behavior modification, group coaching, cooking demonstrations, recipes and gift bags with healthy ingredients and fresh produce, and addressing social needs.
Active Comparator: Arm 3: Cohort B (type 2 diabetes patients who do not currently qualify for MTMs) Active Comparator
Participants in this arm are type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension or elevated blood pressure who do not currently qualify for medically tailored meals (MTM) programs. This arm will receive God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of 10 home-delivered MTMs per week and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period. In addition, they will receive a culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program that consists of didactic sessions focused on lifestyle change and the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework, setting weekly specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals for health behavior modification, group coaching, cooking demonstrations, recipes and gift bags with healthy ingredients, and addressing social needs.
God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of weekly home-delivered MTMs and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period. The Food is Medicine Coalition Clinical Committee establishes and regularly updates the MTM Nutrition Standards, which catalogue the nutrition quality of this evidence-based intervention. Arms 1-3 will receive 10 MTMs per week for 8 months. Arm 4 will receive a distinct dosing down approach as follows: 10 MTMs/week in months 1-3, 9 MTMs/week in month 4, 8 MTMs/week in month 5, 7 MTMs/week in month 6, 6 MTMs/week in month 7, and 5 MTMs/week in month 8.
Culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program that consists of didactic sessions focused on lifestyle change and the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework, setting weekly specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals for health behavior modification, group coaching, cooking demonstrations, recipes and gift bags with healthy ingredients and fresh produce, and addressing social needs.
Experimental: Arm 4: Cohort B (type 2 diabetes patients who do not currently qualify for MTMs) Intervention
Participants in this arm are type 2 diabetes patients with hypertension or elevated blood pressure who do not currently qualify for medically tailored meals (MTM) programs. This arm will receive the MTM program and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period but with a distinct MTM dosing schedule. They will receive the regular MTM schedule of 10 MTMs/week for the first 3 months of the intervention. After this initial period, MTM dosing will be gradually reduced by 1 MTM each month to a target schedule of 5 MTMs/week in the final month of the intervention. In addition, they will also receive the same culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program as Arms 2 and 3.
God's Love We Deliver's current MTM program, which consists of weekly home-delivered MTMs and nutritional counseling by a Registered Dietitian Nutritionist for an 8-month period. The Food is Medicine Coalition Clinical Committee establishes and regularly updates the MTM Nutrition Standards, which catalogue the nutrition quality of this evidence-based intervention. Arms 1-3 will receive 10 MTMs per week for 8 months. Arm 4 will receive a distinct dosing down approach as follows: 10 MTMs/week in months 1-3, 9 MTMs/week in month 4, 8 MTMs/week in month 5, 7 MTMs/week in month 6, 6 MTMs/week in month 7, and 5 MTMs/week in month 8.
Culturally and contextually tailored cardiovascular health promotion program that consists of didactic sessions focused on lifestyle change and the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 framework, setting weekly specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely (S.M.A.R.T.) goals for health behavior modification, group coaching, cooking demonstrations, recipes and gift bags with healthy ingredients and fresh produce, and addressing social needs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Diet Quality
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months (primary endpoint)
The Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans (MEPA) scale, which captures adherence to a heart healthy dietary pattern, will be used to assess diet quality. The MEPA score ranges from 0-16 with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The change in MEPA scores from baseline to 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months (primary endpoint)
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months (primary endpoint)
A fast and accurate HbA1c fingerstick test will assess changes in glycemic control from baseline to 3 months and 8 months (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months (primary endpoint)
Change in systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months (primary endpoint)
The change office systolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to follow-up at 3 months and 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months (primary endpoint)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean HbA1c
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
A fast and accurate HbA1c fingerstick test will assess glycemic control and mean HbA1c will be compared at 3 months and 8 months (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Change in diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
The change office diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline to follow-up at 3 months and 8 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean systolic blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean office systolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 3 months (mid-trial) and 8-months of follow-up (end of trial) calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean diastolic blood pressure
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Mean office diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) at 3 months (mid-trial) and 8-months of follow-up (end of trial) calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Acceptability of Implementation
Time Frame: 8 months
Acceptability will be measured by questionnaire. Items are adapted from the validated Acceptability of Implementation Measure (AIM) and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better intervention acceptability. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
8 months
Feasibility of Implementation
Time Frame: 8 months
Feasibility will be measured by questionnaire using items adapted from the validated Feasibility of Implementation Measure (FIM) and rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better feasibility. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
8 months
Appropriateness of Implementation
Time Frame: 8 months
Appropriateness will be measured by questionnaire. Items are adapted from the validated Implementation Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "Completely disagree" and 5 indicating "Completely agree." Higher scores indicate better appropriateness. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
8 months
Food Insecurity
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 8 months
The USDA Household Food Security Survey (FSSM-6 item) will be administered at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months. The scores range from 0-6 such that a score of 0-1 indicates high or marginal food security, 2-4 indicates low food security, and 5-6 indicates very low food security. Changes in the score from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months will be evaluated. In addition differences in mean scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Nutrition Insecurity
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
The Gretchen Swanson 4-item nutrition screener will be administered at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months (score range: 0-4 with higher scores indicating higher nutrition security). Changes in the score from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months will be evaluated. In addition differences in mean scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Sleep Health
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Sleep duration and quality will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, score range: 0-21). Changes in self-reported habitual hours of sleep and the PSQI score from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months will be evaluated. In addition differences in mean sleep duration and PSQI scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Self-rated health
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Participant will rate their health as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months. Changes in self-rated health from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months as well as the differences in mean self-rated health will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
General Health Status
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 8 months
The EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) will be used to measure general health status and quality of life. This will be captured based on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Based on the participant's response for reach dimension they will receive a 1-digit number, and the digits for the five dimensions will be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. This study will evaluate changes in this measure from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months. In addition, differences in mean scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Mean Diet Quality
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
The Mediterranean Eating Pattern for Americans (MEPA) scale, which captures adherence to a heart healthy dietary pattern, will be used to assess diet quality. The MEPA score ranges from 0-16 with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The mean MEPA scores at 3 months will be calculated and compared across randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Satisfaction with Intervention
Time Frame: 8 months
Satisfaction with the intervention components will be measured by questionnaire. Participants will rate their satisfaction with intervention by indicating how likely they are to recommend it to others on a 10-point scale with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction (net promoter score). They will also be asked to rate the quality of the intervention as poor, fair, good, very good, or excellent. The items are analyzed individually and not summed to a total score.
8 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Food Insecurity
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 8 months
The USDA Household Food Security Survey (FSSM-6 item) will be administered at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months. The scores range from 0-6 such that a score of 0-1 indicates high or marginal food security, 2-4 indicates low food security, and 5-6 indicates very low food security. Changes in the score from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months will be evaluated. In addition differences in mean scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Nutrition Insecurity
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
The Gretchen Swanson 4-item nutrition screener will be administered at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months (score range: 0-4 with higher scores indicating higher nutrition security). Changes in the score from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months will be evaluated. In addition differences in mean scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Sleep Health
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Sleep duration and quality will be measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI, score range: 0-21). Changes in self-reported habitual hours of sleep and the PSQI score from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months will be evaluated. In addition differences in mean sleep duration and PSQI scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 month, 8 months
Self-rated health
Time Frame: baseline, 3 months, 8 months
Participant will rate their health as excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor at baseline, 3 months, and 8 months. Changes in self-rated health from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months as well as the differences in mean self-rated health will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 months, 8 months
General Health Status
Time Frame: baseline, 3 month, 8 months
The EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) will be used to measure general health status and quality of life. This will be captured based on five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, and each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. Based on the participant's response for reach dimension they will receive a 1-digit number, and the digits for the five dimensions will be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. This study will evaluate changes in this measure from baseline to follow up at 3 month and 8 months. In addition, differences in mean scores will be compared across the randomization arms (comparing Arm 1 vs. Arm 2 and Arm 3 vs. Arm 4).
baseline, 3 month, 8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nour Makarem, PhD, FAHA, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared de-identified and in aggregate, consistent with the American Hospital Association Healthcare x Food requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Blood Pressure

Clinical Trials on Medically Tailored Meals and Nutritional Counseling

Subscribe