- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06552195
Augmented Reality in Learning Anatomy: The TEACHANATOMY Randomized Cross-over Trial
Hologram-Based Augmented Reality in Learning Anatomy: The TEACHANATOMY Randomized Cross-over Trial
Cadaver use in anatomy education is undergoing several limitations in many universities, due to high costs, time constraints and supply difficulties. As alternatives to cadaver dissections, new teaching methods based on visual technologies, such as augmented reality (AR), are being implemented worldwide.
Augmented reality (AR), based on virtual interactive 3-dimensional elements (holograms) overlaid in the real-world, represents a promising alternative to explore the human body. In this study, we will test the efficacy of AR as an alternative teaching method in anatomy education by comparing traditional learning methods based on 2-dimensional (2D) images, videos, and online learning programs with the novel AR learning module The primary endpoint will consist of the score in the final theoretical and practical knowledge tests, assessed at two timepoints: immediately after the study session and after 3 months.
Secondary endpoints will include adverse health symptoms and user experience, assessed immediately after the study session.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cadaver use in anatomy education is undergoing several limitations in many universities, due to high costs, time constraints and supply difficulties. As alternatives to cadaver dissections, new teaching methods based on visual technologies, such as augmented reality (AR), are being implemented worldwide.
Augmented reality (AR), based on virtual interactive 3-dimensional elements (holograms) overlaid in the real-world, represents a promising alternative to explore the human body. In this study, we will test the efficacy of AR as an alternative teaching method in anatomy education. Our hypothesis is that learning with AR is more efficient than traditional learning methods.
Preparation: We will prepare 2 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens to allow visualization of anatomical structure of the shoulder and hips. The cadavers will be obtained from a human body donated for university teaching activities. Using a digital single-lens reflex camera, we will acquire several images. These images will be then converted into a 3D model by the ROCS team at Balgrist University Hospital and optimized for use with the Magic Leap AR headset.
Procedure: Participants (approx. 300) will be randomly assigned to the AR or the traditional learning (TL) group. Each participant will learn one anatomy module with traditional learning methods, which will include books, access to websites, 3D videos, and online learning programs, and one module with the AR-based learning program. The two modules will be administered approximately 3 weeks apart.
Group A: Shoulder anatomy with traditional learning methods and hips anatomy with AR based 3D program.
Group B: Shoulder anatomy with AR based 3D program and hips anatomy with traditional learning methods.
The primary endpoint will consist of the score in the final theoretical and practical anatomy tests, assessed at two timepoints: immediately after the study session and after 3 months.
Secondary endpoints include adverse health symptoms, assessed with a Likert scale survey, and user experience, evaluated using an adapted NASA Task Load Index scale plus additional questions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Lukas Zingg, MD
- Phone Number: +41 0796644805
- Email: Lukas.zingg@balgrist.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Philipp Fürnstahl, Prof.
- Phone Number: +41 044 510 73 60
- Email: philipp.fuernstahl@balgrist.ch
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Medical students attending the 1st or 2nd year of undergraduate medical education
- Must not have prior anatomical education
Exclusion Criteria:
- Epilepsy
- Binocular vision disorder such as strabismus
- Current head and/or neck injuries
- Inflammation of the scalp and/or eye
- Amputations or partial amputations of the hands
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Shoulder anatomy with augmented reality (AR) , hips anatomy with traditional learning (TL)
Participants first learn the shoulder anatomy with AR.
After a washout period of three weeks, they will learn the hips anatomy with traditional Learning (TL) methods
|
Study presentation: participants will be given a 10-minute general introduction on the study followed by a 20 minutes tutorial to introduce the HoloLens 2 and the TEACHANATOMY learning platform.
|
|
Active Comparator: Traditional learning (TL) group.
Participants first learn the shoulder anatomy with Traditional learning methods.
After a washout period of three weeks, they will learn the hips anatomy with augmented reality (AR)
|
Study presentation: participants will be given a 10-minute general introduction on the study followed by a 20 minutes tutorial to introduce the HoloLens 2 and the TEACHANATOMY learning platform.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
knowledge test
Time Frame: immediately after the study session, day 1, and after three months
|
The primary outcome will consist of the score in the final theoretical and practical tests.
The theoretical test consists of single and multiple-choice questions in which participants will be required to recognize and name the different anatomical structures of the hips or shoulder and their function.
In the practical part, participants will be required to mark specific anatomical structures in a 3D-printed anatomical skull model.
The duration of the test will be of approximately 30 minutes.
|
immediately after the study session, day 1, and after three months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
adverse health symptoms
Time Frame: Immediately after the knowledge test, Day 1
|
Secondary outcomes will include adverse health symptoms, evaluated with a questionnaire to assess presence and severity of general symptoms (General discomfort, Fatigue, Headache, Dizziness, Nausea, Concentration problems, Disorientation, Neck stiffness/neck pain, No symptoms) and eye-related symptoms (Blurred vision, Difficulty focusing, Double-vision, Dry eyes No symptoms).
Presence and severity of symptoms will be rated on a Likert scale from 1 (almost imperceptible) to 10 (extreme).
|
Immediately after the knowledge test, Day 1
|
|
User experience
Time Frame: Immediately after the Adverse health symptoms, Day 1
|
User experience will be assessed using an adapted NASA Task Load Index (5 questions, range, 1-10, with lower scores indicating lower cognitive workload) plus additional 10-point Likert scale and open-ended questions in which participants will be asked to rank their comfort with the material and hardware and the teaching effectiveness of the software or of the traditional learning methods to learn anatomy
|
Immediately after the Adverse health symptoms, Day 1
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lukas Zingg, MD, Balgrust University Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bolek KA, De Jong G, Henssen D. The effectiveness of the use of augmented reality in anatomy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 27;11(1):15292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94721-4.
- Chytas D, Johnson EO, Piagkou M, Mazarakis A, Babis GC, Chronopoulos E, Nikolaou VS, Lazaridis N, Natsis K. The role of augmented reality in Anatomical education: An overview. Ann Anat. 2020 May;229:151463. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151463. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
- Curran VR, Xu X, Aydin MY, Meruvia-Pastor O. Use of Extended Reality in Medical Education: An Integrative Review. Med Sci Educ. 2022 Dec 19;33(1):275-286. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01698-4. eCollection 2023 Feb.
- Gsaxner C, Li J, Pepe A, Jin Y, Kleesiek J, Schmalstieg D, Egger J. The HoloLens in medicine: A systematic review and taxonomy. Med Image Anal. 2023 Apr;85:102757. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2023.102757. Epub 2023 Jan 21.
- McBain KA, Habib R, Laggis G, Quaiattini A, M Ventura N, Noel GPJC. Scoping review: The use of augmented reality in clinical anatomical education and its assessment tools. Anat Sci Educ. 2022 Jul;15(4):765-796. doi: 10.1002/ase.2155. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
- Moro C, Birt J, Stromberga Z, Phelps C, Clark J, Glasziou P, Scott AM. Virtual and Augmented Reality Enhancements to Medical and Science Student Physiology and Anatomy Test Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anat Sci Educ. 2021 May;14(3):368-376. doi: 10.1002/ase.2049. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
- Navab N, Martin-Gomez A, Seibold M, Sommersperger M, Song T, Winkler A, Yu K, Eck U. Medical Augmented Reality: Definition, Principle Components, Domain Modeling, and Design-Development-Validation Process. J Imaging. 2022 Dec 23;9(1):4. doi: 10.3390/jimaging9010004.
- Stojanovska M, Tingle G, Tan L, Ulrey L, Simonson-Shick S, Mlakar J, Eastman H, Gotschall R, Boscia A, Enterline R, Henninger E, Herrmann KA, Simpson SW, Griswold MA, Wish-Baratz S. Mixed Reality Anatomy Using Microsoft HoloLens and Cadaveric Dissection: A Comparative Effectiveness Study. Med Sci Educ. 2019 Nov 15;30(1):173-178. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00834-x. eCollection 2020 Mar.
- Stromberga Z, Phelps C, Smith J, Moro C. Teaching with Disruptive Technology: The Use of Augmented, Virtual, and Mixed Reality (HoloLens) for Disease Education. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1317:147-162. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-61125-5_8.
- Uruthiralingam U, Rea PM. Augmented and Virtual Reality in Anatomical Education - A Systematic Review. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1235:89-101. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-37639-0_5.
- Moro C, Stromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A. The effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality in health sciences and medical anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2017 Nov;10(6):549-559. doi: 10.1002/ase.1696. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- TEACHANATOMY 2.0
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Augmented Reality
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingVirtual Reality | Augmented RealityUnited States
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...CompletedVirtual Reality | Augmented Reality | Oral Care PerformanceTaiwan
-
Klinikum Saarbrücken, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-...University of Kaiserslautern-Landau; Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Künstliche...CompletedFeasibility and Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Assistance System for Pancreatic Surgery (ARAS-P)Pancreatectomy | Augmented RealityGermany
-
Seif El-Din Amr Hussein HegabNot yet recruiting
-
Stanford UniversityCompleted
-
Damanhour UniversityCompletedGamification | Augmented RealityEgypt
-
Balgrist University HospitalUniversity of ZurichCompletedAugmented Reality | Anatomy EducationSwitzerland
-
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineCompletedEducational Problems | Serious Game | Augmented RealityChina
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedNurse's Role | Augmented Reality | Equipment and SuppliesKorea, Republic of
-
Universitätsklinikum KölnNot yet recruitingLaparoscopy | Liver | Augmented Reality | Orientation, SpatialGermany
Clinical Trials on learning with augmented reality
-
The University of Hong KongCompletedAugmented RealityHong Kong
-
Balgrist University HospitalUniversity of ZurichCompletedAugmented Reality | Anatomy EducationSwitzerland
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiNot yet recruiting
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiNot yet recruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesGreece
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandCompletedMyoma;Uterus | Adenomyoma of UterusFrance
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedType1diabetes | Metabolic Syndrome | Nursing CariesTurkey
-
Damanhour UniversityCompletedGamification | Augmented RealityEgypt
-
Philippe TerrierSwiss Heart FoundationUnknownStroke | Traumatic Brain Injury | Spinal Cord InjurySwitzerland
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedStroke | Hemiparesis | Walking, DifficultyUnited States