Effect of Virtual BASRD Reality Training Versus Conservative Treatment In Chronic Hemipretic Stroke Survivors

August 30, 2024 updated by: Muhammad Naveed Babur, Superior University
In hemiparetic stroke patient's VR is very useful. Due to hemiparesis one side muscle weakness occurs because of disruption in brain, spinal cord and nervous system technologies improvs motor activities of patients, by improvement in motor activities patients perform activities in better way.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study's main aim is to check virtual reality's effect on conservative treatment in hemiparetic stroke patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan
        • Depalpur

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both ischemia and hemorrhagic stroke.
  • Stroke Patients who were in Chronic phase diagnosed by Physician were included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with the history of previous stroke attacks.
  • Brainstem stroke
  • Epilepsy
  • Severely impaired communication and cognition
  • Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis
  • Other musculoskeletal and psychological disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
For gait training, participants practiced walking on flat surfaces, sometimes with the assistance of parallel bars or walking aids, to improve their walking speed, step length, and rhythm. They also performed sit-to-stand exercises to strengthen the lower limbs and improve mobility for daily activities. Additionally, manual therapy techniques, such as joint mobilizations and stretching, were applied to reduce spasticity and increase range of motion in the affected limbs. Both treatment groups progressed based on individual capabilities, with therapists adjusting exercises accordingly throughout the study. In this study, both the intervention and control groups underwent a 6-week treatment plan consisting of 5 sessions per week, with each session lasting 45 minutes.
Experimental: Exp Group
Balance and coordination were targeted through virtual stepping tasks, where participants practiced stepping in various directions to improve postural control and lower limb function. Additionally, they performed virtual balance exercises by standing on simulated platforms of varying stability. For gait and mobility, participants practiced walking in a virtual environment with real-time feedback to correct gait abnormalities. They also encountered virtual obstacles, which required them to adapt their walking patterns and improve mobility. In this study, both the intervention and control groups underwent a 6-week treatment plan consisting of 5 sessions per week, with each session lasting 45 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Barthel index
Time Frame: 12 Months
The Barthel Index is a scale used to measure a person's ability to perform basic activities of daily living (ADL) independently. It assesses 10 areas of functioning, with a focus on mobility and self-care. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater independence. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) It assesses the impact of stroke on the quality of life across various domains, including physical, emotional, social, and cognitive aspects. It uses 12 domains with items scored on a 5-point Likert scale
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Exp Group

Subscribe