Time of Treatment in HALL Technique Vs ART

October 10, 2024 updated by: Doaa Mohamed Khalil, Cairo University

Time of Treatment of Hall Technique Versus Atraumatic Restorative Technique in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the time of treatment of Hall Technique versus Atraumatic Restorative Technique in the management of carious primary molars. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the Hall Technique provide a faster and pain-free treatment compared to ART?
  • How do the outcomes of both techniques impact children's acceptance and behavior? Researchers will compare the Hall Technique, which uses preformed metal crowns without caries removal, to Atraumatic Restorative Treatment, which uses hand instruments to selectively remove carious tissue.

Participants will:

  • Receive treatment using either the Hall Technique or ART in a single session.
  • Attend follow-up visits to monitor the effectiveness and acceptance of the treatment.
  • Complete assessments on their experience and comfort during and after the procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: From 4 to 6 years.
  • Caries in primary molars within enamel/dentin with vital pulp.
  • Healthy children.
  • Cooperative children

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of signs and symptoms of necrosis.
  • Root caries.
  • History of spontaneous pain.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ART

A sharp excavator will be used to remove soft demineralized carious tissue from the patient's primary molar 2-The molar will then be restored with capsulated Glass Ionomer in accordance to ART procedure.

3-Each capsule will be mixed for ten seconds and used for restoring teeth isolated by cotton rolls.

4-After the cement is cured, excess material will be removed with an excavator and a carver.

5-The occlusion will be tested for interferences with carbon paper. A layer of varnish coat will be applied to the surface and light-cured for 20 seconds .

Active Comparator: HALL technique

The procedure involves assessing the occlusion, contact points, and tooth shape. If contact points are present, orthodontic separators will be placed between the primary molars to create space for crown fitting, with the child seated upright to maintain airway safety. After 3 to 5 days, the separators will be removed, and loose plaque and debris will be cleared.

The correct crown size will be selected, ensuring it doesn't impinge on adjacent teeth, and will be filled with glass ionomer cement. The child will be instructed to bite down for two minutes to ensure proper seating. Excess cement will be removed, and contacts will be flossed. Any initial occlusal discrepancies are expected to resolve within weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time of treatment
Time Frame: during the procedure
Time will be measured from the start of the procedure till its end using digital chronometer as a device and minutes as a unit.
during the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain and discomfort
Time Frame: immediately after the procedure , 3month ,6 month and 12 month
Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child will be recorded using the Face Pain Scale - revised (FPS-R), which has six numbered faces from 0 to10 The (FPS-R). Each child will be asked to mark the face that reflects her or his experienced pain during the treatment. There is no pain visible on this face [indicating the face on the far left]. As you move from left to right, the faces get progressively more painful until you reach this one, which is incredibly painful [indicating the face on the far right]. The (FPS-R) faces will be scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
immediately after the procedure , 3month ,6 month and 12 month
Child behavior
Time Frame: during the procedure
At the end of the treatment session, the dentist classifies the child's behavior during the treatment according to Venham Behavior Rating Scale is a reliable system for rating behavior of children in the dental setting. ratings will be scored as 0-1-2-3-4-5
during the procedure
Canine overbite: HT
Time Frame: preoperatively , immediately after the procedure , 3 month , 6 month, 12 month
the canine overbite will be measured only for the hall technique group. The canine overbite will be measured before the procedure using a Boley Gauge, either on the same side or the opposite side if the canine is missing. After assessing tooth shape and occlusion, a stainless-steel crown (SSC) will be partially seated on the tooth with glass ionomer cement. The child will bite on a cotton roll to fully seat the crown, after which excess cement will be removed, and the overbite will be recorded immediately after treatment.
preoperatively , immediately after the procedure , 3 month , 6 month, 12 month
Child anxiety
Time Frame: during the procedure
At the end of the treatment session, the dentist classifies the child's anxiety during the treatment according to Venham Anxiety Rating Scale is a reliable system for rating anxiety of children in the dental setting. ratings will be scored as 0-1-2-3-4-5
during the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Hall technique VS ART

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Subscribe