AdLip: Human Coach-supported Digital/AI Personal Health Assistant to Improve Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Medication (AdLip)

October 1, 2024 updated by: Tan Su-Yin Doreen, National University of Singapore

AdLip: Use of Human Coach-supported Digital/AI Personal Health Assistant to Improve Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Medications: a Multi-centre Randomised Controlled Trial

Investigators hypothesize that the use of a human coach-supported digital/AI personal health assistant (app) will improve adherence to cholesterol-lowering medications (statins with or without ezetimibe) among patients with hyperlipidaemia and suboptimal LDL-C control, when compared to standard care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hyperlipidemia remains as one of the three leading metabolic risk factors underlying AMI onset by 2050. In recent study 3 Asian ethnicities with AMI, the incidence of hyperlipidemia is projected to increase by 205% (341 to 1041 per 100,000 population) from 2025 to 2050. A combination of lifestyle modifications and lipid-lowering therapy is typically recommended for individuals with high LDL-C levels to reduce the risk of CVD. The World Health Organization (WHO) defines adherence as "the extent to which the person's behaviour (including medication-taking) corresponds with agreed recommendations from a healthcare provider"

Poor medication adherence portends poorer health outcomes. In Singapore, around 60% of adults not taking their medications as prescribed (as above) and this creates a considerable economic and clinical burden to individuals and health systems.

The use of digital technology in medication adherence has continued to grow as more healthcare providers and patients recognise its benefits in improving adherence and overall health outcome. Digital interventions have effectively helped patients manage their medication by reminding patients to take their medications on time and providing them with more information about their medications and treatment plan. In the busy world today, the provision of appropriately timed and that perceived to be important would be key to effectively convince intentionally non-adherent patients to take their medicines as prescribed.

This study is a multicentre, open-label, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial. We intent to randomly assign patients with hyperlipidaemia into one of the two groups: human coach-supported Digital/AI Personal Health Assistant app (intervention group) and standard care (control group) with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The intervention group will receive personalised feedback through the app coupled with human coaching on top of usual clinical care for cholesterol management. The control group will receive usual standard of care for lipid management but will not receive the personalised app nor have access to health coaching.

Participants with hyperlipidaemia (n=376) will be enrolled in polyclinics, and key inclusion criteria are participants who are non-adherent to statins "Extent to Non-adherence" sub-scale of the DOSE Non-Adherence Measure), with a score > 1 (range from 0-15) with or without on ezetimibe and have LDL-C level above the recommended target levels stratified by risk category. Participants will be followed up at Visit 2 @Month 3, Visit 3 @ Month 6 and Visit 4 @ Month 12 while pill counts will be collected @3m, 6m, and 12m visits. As part of Standard-of-Care, clinical pharmacist will follow-up with patients, titrating lipid-lowering medication (such as statin, ezetimibe etc) as required, and review and take action clinical blood test results.

Only those in intervention group, Human-AI-Health coach will use the information gathered by the AI chatbot to guide the targeted behavioural intervention during phone consultation. The scope of coaching will be strictly related to the medication adherence and general well-being. The coach will not start, stop, or titrate any medication. Coach will escalate concerns to clinical pharmacists when deemed fit. A sub-study of focus group discussion will be conducted with a nested sample of 30-50 intervention group patients. The aims are: (a) to collect insights from intervention patients on their experiences with the app and human health coaching, (b) insights into which intervention components work best for them and under what circumstances, (c) insights into concerns which might impact intervention effectiveness, (d) factors that draw their participation and sustained engagement, (e) factors that deter them from sustainable engagement, (f) factors that may lead other CVD patients to be more inclined to partake in such a intervention and (g) ideas and suggestions to make the intervention more appealing and effective.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 138543
        • Recruiting
        • National Healthcare Group Polyclinics
        • Contact:
      • Singapore, Singapore, 609606

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Between 21 to 84 years old
  • Prescribed statins with or without ezetimibe for hyperlipidaemia.
  • Medication non-adherence as defined by the "Extent to Non-adherence" sub-scale of the DOSE Non-Adherence Measure), with a score > 1 (range from 0-15)
  • Singapore residents (citizens, permanent residents, or long-term pass holders).
  • In possession of a smartphone or tablet with Android or iOS operating systems.
  • Have internet access on their mobile devices.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not read or understand English. Current use of smartphone medication adherence app(s) that include statins.
  • Concurrent use of PCSK9 Inhibitors in addition to statins and/or ezetimibe
  • Participation in another study that uses medications that could affect lipid levels
  • Severe renal impairment defined as chronic kidney disease stage 4 and above.
  • Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh Class C)
  • Existing muscular-related complaints or diagnoses which may confound adverse event reporting
  • Uncorrected thyroid conditions, especially poorly-controlled hypothyroidism
  • Documented psychiatric diagnosis or history of mental illness or deemed as unable to give informed consent.
  • Currently pregnant, breastfeeding or expecting to get pregnant during the course of the study (1 year).
  • Guarded prognosis with expectant mortality within 12 months or less.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Standard care
Receive usual standard of care for lipid management
Experimental: Standard care + Human Coach-supported Digital/AI Personal Health Assistant
The intervention group will receive personalised feedback through the digital mobile health app coupled with human coaching (i.e., support from a human coach-supported digital/AI personal health assistant) on top of usual clinical care for cholesterol management.
Receive personalised feedback and educational content curated by local clinicians and pharmacists through the CADENCE D-PHA app coupled with six sessions of human coaching on top of usual clinical care for lipid management over 6 months
Other Names:
  • Statin
  • Health Coaching
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • CADENCE D-PHA
  • Improve Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Medications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication through the use of pill counts
6 and 12 months
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate effectiveness of adherence to lipid-lowering medication through the use of Medication Adherence Report Scale-5 (MARS-5). The score ranges between 5 and 25, with higher scores indicating higher reported adherence.
6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood LDL-cholesterol levels
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Blood LDL-cholesterol levels compared with those receiving standard care.
6 and 12 months
Cardiovascular Risk score
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Different in Singapore-modified Framingham Risk Scores between intervention and control groups. The risk scores range between -5 and 20 for men and between 0 and 27 for women. Higher scores indicate higher 10-year coronary artery disease risk.
6 and 12 months
Changes in health motivation and attitudes
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in health motivation and attitudes using Motivation and Attitude toward Changing Health (MATCH) Scale. It consists of 9 items rated on five-point Likert scale. Higher average scores indicate greater motivation and attitude.
6 and 12 months
Changes in self-care efficacy
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in self-care efficacy using Self-efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS) in low-literacy patients with chronic disease. The scores range between 13 to 39, with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy for medication adherence
6 and 12 months
Changes in self-care behaviours
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Changes in self-care behaviours using EQ-5D-5L, where index scores range from -0.59 to 1, with 1 being the best possible health state. The accompanying EQ VAS scores range from 0 to 100, with 100 being the best possible health state.
6 and 12 months
Changes in quality of life
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Change in quality of life using Single-Item Quality of Life Scale (SI-QOL). A seven-point scale is used, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
6 and 12 months
Changes in quality of life
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Change in quality of life using Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Wellbeing Scale (FACIT-Sp). It consists of 12 items rated on a five-point Likert scale, with the total score ranging between 0 and 48. Higher total score indicates better spiritual wellbeing.
6 and 12 months
Safety of a new model of care
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months

The health coaching integrated in the app is designed with a "do no harm" principle, ensuring that coaching interventions do not cause physical, psychological, or emotional harm to the participants. This principle is embedded both in the content delivered by the coaches and in the app.

Adverse Event (AE) Monitoring:

AE are uncommon for health coaching intervention. However, in the case that adverse psychological events do occur, (e.g., increased anxiety or nervousness), immediate emotional support will be provided. Health coaches will ensure that participants are in emotionally stable state through check-ins (built-in in the coaching checklist), and if necessary, refer them to the healthcare team. AE will be documented in the case notes. Participants will be encouraged to report any negative experiences /symptoms, related to the intervention by using the app or via direct communication with the coach. User feedback on the app-experiences will be collected.

6 and 12 months
Acceptability of a new model of care
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate the acceptability of a new model of care with the use of Chatbot Usability Questionnaire. A higher score would imply better acceptability.
6 and 12 months
Acceptability of a new model of care
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Evaluate the acceptability of a new model of care with the use of MHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). A higher score would imply better acceptability.
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ying Xian Chua, National University Polyclinics
  • Principal Investigator: Ziliang Lim, National Healthcare Group Polyclinics
  • Principal Investigator: Andy Khong, Nanyang Technological University
  • Principal Investigator: Andy Hau Yan Ho, Nanyang Technological University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 14, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 14, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023/00438

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hyperlipidemia

Subscribe