Training Community Members to be Coaches to Deliver the HealthyLifetime Program

June 13, 2025 updated by: Kathleen Potempa, University of Michigan

Evaluating the Use of Community Members Trained as Health Coaches to Deliver the HealthyLifetimeTM Program

The goal of this randomized controlled study is to learn if, in addition to nurses, community members can be trained as health coaches to deliver the HealthyLifetime (HL) program to people without complex chronic health conditions, an intervention that provides a short-term and effective health coaching intervention delivered through a virtual platform to improve health, resiliency, and independent self-care to participants who are without complex chronic conditions. The main question it aims to answer is:

• Can Community Health Coaches achieve the same level of competency and outcome as Nurse Health Coaches in participants without complex chronic conditions?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will evaluate the use of trained community members [Health Coach, (HC)] in delivering the HealthyLifetime program to adults without complex chronic conditions. Our cumulative learnings about effective HL strategies, training, and outcomes assessments set the stage for the proposed use of trained community members as HL Health Coaches under the supervision of the nurse Clinical Services Manager. The Independent Living Index (ILI) measures 'risk' for loss of independence due to functional decline from complex chronic conditions and other factors. The investigators will use the ILI and other medical information to determine which participants can be appropriately delegated to non-clinical staff coaches, which the investigators define as participants without complex chronic conditions. Our training methods will be adapted for use with community members. Our health coaching competency assessment tools will be used to measure community members trained as Health Coaches and Nurse Health Coach' relative competency. The investigators will compare quantitative and qualitative outcomes between participants coached by HL Health Coaches (community members) vs. HL Nurse Health Coaches and any outcome differences due to demographic, social determinants, or other factors. Finally, the investigators intend to evaluate the program satisfaction and potential cost impact using our Medical Use Index as a proxy for cost savings.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Michigan
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Kathleen Potempa, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Margaret Calarco, PhD
        • Contact:
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48104
        • Recruiting
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 30 years of age, with no more than three, uncomplicated chronic conditions and want to learn to take better care of their health.
  • Independent Living Index (ILI) greater than 35. ILI is derived by averaging the outcome measures scores.
  • A score of less than 4 on items related to anxiety and depressive symptoms
  • Have Medicare and/or Medicaid insurance.
  • Be able to read, speak, and hear English - but may use glasses or hearing aids, if needed;
  • Tell us their age, date of birth, address, and phone number, and explain their health problems;
  • Have a computer, iPad (Tablet), or Smartphone with an Internet connection, email address, a working camera, and microphone;
  • Be able to use their computer/tablet to connect to video chat sessions like Zoom in a private space in their home or a private room
  • Are not currently participating in any other studies involving diet, weight management, exercise and/or coaching at the current time; and
  • Reside in Michigan.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ● Are less than 30 years of age.

    • Have more than three, uncomplicated chronic conditions.
    • A score of more than 4 on items related to anxiety and depressive symptoms
    • Do not have Medicare and/or Medicaid insurance.
    • Do not reside in Michigan.
    • Have a new acute health problem that requires seeing a doctor more than once a month for acute medical treatment.
    • Have been told their illness is not curable.
    • Need help remembering their name, date of birth, or health problems.
    • Cannot use glasses or a hearing aid to see or hear well enough to read materials on the computer or talk to the nurse easily.
    • Are currently participating in any other studies involving diet, weight management, exercise and/or coaching at the current time; and
    • Do not have, or cannot use, a computer, iPad, or another device with the Internet at home to use Zoom (e.g., internet streaming).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Nurse Coach
HealthyLifetime program is administered by an experienced nurse coach.
HealthyLifetimeTM [HL] seeks to intervene early in the aging process when individuals have the best chance for longer-term benefits of changing their health behavior, staving off functional decline, and minimizing the onset or exacerbation of chronic conditions.
Experimental: Health worker coach
HealthyLifetime program is administered by a community health worker
HealthyLifetimeTM [HL] seeks to intervene early in the aging process when individuals have the best chance for longer-term benefits of changing their health behavior, staving off functional decline, and minimizing the onset or exacerbation of chronic conditions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Participant Self- rated satisfaction with various aspects of their home and neighborhood.
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Participants perception of their home and neighborhood on a scale of 1= Extremely Satisfied to 5 = Not at all satisfied
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Satisfaction with Quality of Life
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Questions are about how participant experiences their quality of life on a scale where "1" = "Do not agree at all" and "5" = "Agree completely",
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Positive and negative Lifestyle Habits aggregate
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Composite score of activities that participants engage in that affect health in a negative (lower score) or positive way (higher score) on a scale of 1 to 5. Smoking (yes or no), alcohol (number of drinks per week, 5= none, 5= more than eight), exercise (1 = none to 5= more than 3 hours/week), food choices (One serving or less a day to 5 or more servings a day of positive, e.g., vegetable, or negative food choice, e.g., sugary food), amount of sleep (1 = less than 4 to 5 = more than 7 hours)
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Change in Goal attainment score
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 12 weeks after study enrollment.
Health goals of participants (up to 3) confidence in achieving goal (1= Not confident at all to 10 = Completely Confident)
At 0, 8 and 12 weeks after study enrollment.
Change in Self-efficacy in ability to continue essential life activities
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Ability or confidence of the participant in doing certain activities on a scale of 1= Cannot do this myself/Not confident at all to 5 = Always able to do myself/Completely Confident. For the purposes of answering these questions, confidence is defined as the belief in the participant's chances of being able to do and/or complete an activity (e.g., hobbies and recreation, social visits, chores, errands, etc.) or task (e.g., hobbies and recreation, social visits, chores, errands, etc.) successfully however the participant defines it.
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Sustained higher values of primary measures at 3 months
Time Frame: 20 weeks after study enrollment
Are effects of program noted at 8 weeks still present at 20 weeks.
20 weeks after study enrollment
Change in Self-reported medical visits
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Number of unplanned medical visits with doctor or primary medical provider in past 2 months (0 to 10), emergency room visits (0 to 10 ), overnight stay in hospital (0 to 10).
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CONFIDENCE IN MANAGING SYMPTOMS
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Participant indicate confidence or certainty NOW that they can do the activity or task on scale scale where "1" = "Not confident" and "5" = "Very confident,"
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
PHYSICAL SYMPTOM INVENTORY
Time Frame: At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.
Participant indicates how often they experienced physical symptoms IN THE LAST WEEK on a scale where "1" = "Rarely" and "5" = "Almost always"
At 0, 8 and 20 weeks after study enrollment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen Potempa, PhD, University of Michigan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on HealthyLifetime

Subscribe