Cog-Fun Ageing Participation-centered, Health Promotion for Older Adults

February 4, 2025 updated by: Adina Maeir, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Cog-Fun Ageing Participation-centered, Health Promotion for Older Adult

The goal of this feasibility study is to test the feasibility of a group intervention program based on health management principles for older adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD). SCD is a condition where individuals feel that their memory is worsening, although standard tests do not detect it. This perceived memory decline can lead to negative feelings and self-perception, causing people to withdraw from meaningful activities.

This study aims to answer three main questions:

  1. Is the intervention feasible in terms of fidelity, adherence, and participant satisfaction?
  2. Are the assessments used sensitive enough to identify the unique challenges faced by the SCD population and detect changes after the intervention?
  3. What are the preliminary effects of the intervention on participants' perceptions of how SCD affects their daily life, mental health, and quality of life?

Participants will:

  1. Take part in 14 weekly group sessions focused on managing the challenges of living with SCD and improving participation in daily activities.
  2. Complete assessments before and after the intervention to measure their satisfaction with the program, and track changes in their perceptions of daily life, mental health, and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported memory changes,
  • A score of 23 or higher on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
  • Proficiency in Hebrew to participate fully in a Hebrew-speaking group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a significant health condition that affects functioning
  • Residence in a medical institution or nursing home
  • Current participation in another SCD treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cog Fun Ageing intervention
Cog Fun Ageing is a group-based occupation-centered intervention aimed at promoting positive occupational experiences despite cognitive challenges in day to day life. The intervention includes 14 weekly 120-minute group sessions led by experienced occupational therapists. Sessions incorporate learning about the bio-psycho-social factors of SCD and strategies to manage and cope with occupational challenges resulting from SCD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Memory Impact Questionnaire (MIQ)
Time Frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)
The Memory Impact Questionnaire (MIQ) will be used to assess the impact of perceived memory changes on daily life. The questionnaire was developed for use in both clinical and research settings to better understand the impact of memory changes on the day-to-day functioning of older adults and to monitor outcomes of support programs for this population. The questionnaire includes 51-item comprised of three subscales: Lifestyle Restrictions (19 items exploring social relationships, work, volunteer and leisure activities), Positive Coping (19 items exploring participation in cognitively engaging tasks and other positive responses to memory changes), and Negative Emotions (13 items exploring negative self-perceptions and perceived negative judgments from others). The total score, calculated by reverse-coding Positive Coping items and summing all items, reflects the overall burden of memory changes, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact.
After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Health Questionnaire -4 (PHQ-4 )
Time Frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

The Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) is a brief, self-report screening tool designed to quickly assess symptoms of depression and anxiety in the general population. It includes four questions, with two focused on anxiety and two on depression. The PHQ-4 combines two well-established scales: the PHQ-2 (depression) and the GAD-2 (anxiety).

Participants respond to each question based on how often they have experienced certain symptoms over the past two weeks, using a 4-point Likert scale from 0 = Not at all to 3 = Nearly every day. The total score ranges from 0 to 12, with subscale scores ranging from 0 to 6 for both anxiety and depression. Scores are rated as: 0-2- Normal; 3-5 -Mild; 6-8- Moderate; 9-12- Severe.

Total score ≥3 for first 2 questions suggests anxiety. Total score ≥3 for last 2 questions suggests depression.

After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)
SHARE version of the CASP-12
Time Frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

The CASP-12 (Control, Autonomy, Self-realization, and Pleasure) is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the quality of life (QoL) in older adults, specifically targeting individuals aged 50 and over. The CASP-12 includes 12 items spread across four dimensions: control (the ability to influence one's environment), autonomy (freedom from external influence), self-realization (personal fulfillment), and pleasure (enjoyment in life).

Participants rate each item on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (often) to 4 (never), with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life. The total score can range from 12 to 48, where higher scores suggest greater well-being and satisfaction in the participants' lives.

After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)
Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS)
Time Frame: After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

The Engagement in Meaningful Activities Survey (EMAS) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire used to assess how meaningful a person's daily activities are. The survey asks participants to rate statements like "The activities I do give me a sense of satisfaction"; or "The activities I do help me feel competent," using a 4-point scale where 1 means "rarely"; and 4 means "always". The total score ranges from 12 to 48, with higher scores indicating higher levels of engagement in meaningful activities.

This tool is used to measure changes in how participants perceive the value and meaning of their activities. The EMAS helps identify whether interventions improve participants' sense of purpose and satisfaction in their daily lives.

After enrollment (before intervention) and 14 weeks later (after intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adina Maeir, PhD, School of occupational therapy, faculty of medicine, Hebrew University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Due to the preliminary nature of the study, the outcome measures are still being evaluated for their suitability for interventions for the target population.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD)

Clinical Trials on Cog Fun Ageing intervention

Subscribe