- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06669988
Comparison of Teaching Effectiveness of VR, Video, and Written Materials on Food Hygiene and Equipment Safety
Comparison of the Teaching Effectiveness of VR, Videos, and Written Materials on Food Hygiene Safety and Equipment Operation
This study investigates the impact of virtual reality (VR) as an educational tool in the food industry, comparing it to traditional methods like videos and written materials in teaching hygiene and safety. VR offers immersive, realistic training that allows employees to simulate food-handling scenarios, including handwashing, hazard identification, and emergency responses, which may enhance engagement and effectiveness. The study aims to clarify the advantages and limitations of VR-based education against traditional approaches by assessing learning effectiveness, usefulness, playfulness, ease of use, and long-term knowledge retention.
Participants will be assigned to one of the three educational methods (VR, video, or written materials) and evaluated through pre-tests, post-tests, and follow-up assessments one month later. Non-parametric statistical analysis, specifically the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, will assess the effectiveness of each educational method based on test scores and satisfaction surveys.
The study will be conducted at Fu Jen Catholic University's Department of Nutrition, following ethical guidelines and informed consent protocols to protect participants' welfare and data privacy. Professional supervision and carefully maintained equipment will ensure a safe learning environment, with adverse reactions monitored and documented throughout.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Virtual Reality (VR) is a rapidly evolving field with immense potential in education. In recent years, aside from medical education, VR is also growing in the food industry. Using VR, employees can receive realistic, immersive training experiences, enabling them to learn knowledge in hygiene and safety. The purpose of this shift in educational methods is to enhance the effectiveness of training for professionals. By using VR, employees can simulate real-life scenarios in restaurant, including tasks such as handling ingredients, practicing proper handwashing procedures, identifying and resolving potential hazards, and responding to emergency situations. VR in hygiene and safety education offers numerous benefits to the food industry. Therefore, this study aims to explore whether VR can replace or complement traditional educational methods in original course. By using different educational methods, including VR, videos, and written materials, the study seeks to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of traditional education and technology-based education. Building on the original course, this study compares the learning effectiveness, usefulness, playfulness, ease of use, and long-term knowledge retention of these three educational methods.
The statistical method planned for this study is non-parametric analysis, specifically the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, to analyze the participants' data. The evaluation of results will focus on the learning effectiveness assessment, with the primary evaluation indicators being the scores from the pre-test, post-test, and VR post-test. One month later, a re-evaluation of knowledge retention will be conducted. In the satisfaction survey, the main aspects assessed will be usefulness, playfulness, ease of use.
This study will first use a written consent form to ensure that participants fully understand the study's purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. The consent form will include the following key information: the purpose of the study, the research procedures and possible risks, privacy protection measures for participants, voluntary participation, and the right to withdraw from the study at any time.
The researchers will explain the study plan in detail to the participants during the initial meeting and answer any questions they may have. This activity will take place in a classroom at Fu Jen Catholic University's Department of Nutrition. Participants will have sufficient time to read and understand the consent form thoroughly, and they will be able to ask questions before signing it. There will be two copies of the consent form: one for the participant to keep and another for the research team to archive, ensuring the safety and protection of participants. This study will ensure that all instructional activities are conducted under professional supervision, using well-tested and properly maintained equipment. While using the VR equipment, participants will be guided by trained professionals to avoid any discomfort or injuries that may result from improper use. If participants experience any adverse reactions during the study, such as dizziness, eye fatigue, or emotional discomfort, their participation will be immediately halted, and on-site personnel will provide an initial assessment and appropriate care. All adverse events will be documented and reported to the study principal investigator. If necessary, further evaluations will be conducted to determine if adjustments to the study protocol or procedures are required.
This study will strictly adhere to personal data protection regulations to ensure the confidentiality and security of all participants' information. Participants' identities will not be disclosed in any research reports or publications. These measures will help ensure that the study complies with ethical guidelines, respects the rights and welfare of participants, and addresses any potential adverse reactions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: SHIH HSIN-YU
- Phone Number: +886936672330
- Email: s409470307@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hsin-Yi Yang, PhD
- Phone Number: +886928645801
- Email: b8506044@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- native Chinese speakers
- normal vision, hearing, and hand mobility
Exclusion Criteria:
- in other VR-related studies
- symptoms of dizziness when wearing a virtual reality headset
- have taken courses in food service or food hygiene and safety
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: VR Group
In the VR group, participants will wear virtual reality headsets, experiencing immersive learning in a 3D space with interactive scenarios.
Interactive buttons will assist them, making it feel as if they are physically entering a large-scale food service environment.
The immersive learning focuses on operating large kitchen equipment, and the first-person perspective will make participants feel as if they are truly in the environment, preparing food in real-time.
The VR experience will cover everything from clothing regulations, hygiene and safety precautions, and the use of large kitchen equipment to food service procedures and emergency response.
All these aspects are integrated into the learning process.
|
VR - Immersive instruction using virtual reality.
|
|
Experimental: Video Group
In the video group, participants will watch a video that features scenarios similar to those in the VR experience.
However, instead of interacting with a 3D space, the content will be presented in a 2D format without the immersive spatial element.
|
Video - Educational content presented through video.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Written Materials Group
In the written materials group, the content will be presented through photos and text, without offering dynamic visuals or the immersive 3D spatial experience.
|
Written Materials - Instruction using text and images.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
learning effectiveness assessment
Time Frame: an hour
|
Primary evaluation indicators being the scores from the pre-test, post-test, and VR post-test.
|
an hour
|
|
knowledge retention
Time Frame: From enrollment to one month after the completion of the teaching intervention.
|
Re-evaluation indicators being the scores from the post-test, and VR post-test.
|
From enrollment to one month after the completion of the teaching intervention.
|
|
user experience feedback
Time Frame: an hour
|
A total of 12 questions, using a satisfaction rating scale from 1 to 5, with 5 being the highest score.
The main content includes ease of use of the VR equipment, whether it enhances learning motivation, understanding of spatial concepts, and skills in food service.
|
an hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chao YC, Hu SH, Chiu HY, Huang PH, Tsai HT, Chuang YH. The effects of an immersive 3d interactive video program on improving student nurses' nursing skill competence: A randomized controlled trial study. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Aug;103:104979. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104979. Epub 2021 May 18.
- Aksoy E. Comparing the Effects on Learning Outcomes of Tablet-Based and Virtual Reality-Based Serious Gaming Modules for Basic Life Support Training: Randomized Trial. JMIR Serious Games. 2019 May 1;7(2):e13442. doi: 10.2196/13442.
- Makinen H, Haavisto E, Havola S, Koivisto JM. Graduating nursing students' user experiences of the immersive virtual reality simulation in learning - A qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Open. 2023 May;10(5):3210-3219. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1571. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
Helpful Links
- Kwon, C. Verification of the possibility and effectiveness of experiential learning using HMD-based immersive VR technologies. Virtual Reality 2019; 23: 101-118.
- Kamińska, D., et al. Virtual Reality and Its Applications in Education: Survey. Information 2019; 10: 318.
- Karanezi, X., E. Rapti, and G. Halimi Traditional and Modern Teaching Methodologies: Which One is More Successful and What are the Challenges? Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2015; 4: 311.
- Pan, Z., et al. Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Computers & Graphics 2006; 30: 20-28.
- Clark, J., P. Crandall, and J. Shabatura Wearable Technology Effects on Training Outcomes of Restaurant Food Handlers. Journal of Food Protection 2018; 81: 1220-1226.
- Mikropoulos, T.A. and A. Natsis Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999-2009). Computers & Education 2011; 56: 769-780.
- Merchant, Z., et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education 2014; 70: 29-40.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- C112203
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality
-
The Cleveland ClinicRecruitingEndoscopy | Virtual Reality | Ergonomics | Virtual Reality HeadsetUnited States
-
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS TrustNot yet recruitingVirtual Reality | Education, Medical | Virtual Reality Simulation
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedVirtual Reality | Pediatric Burn | Immersive Virtual Reality | Passive Virtual RealityEgypt
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingVirtual Reality | Augmented RealityUnited States
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting
-
National Taiwan University HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Charles River AnalyticsNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); The New England...Completed
-
Ardahan UniversityCompleted
-
The Methodist Hospital Research InstituteNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedVirtual RealityUnited States
Clinical Trials on VR
-
Prof. Dominique de Quervain, MDRecruitingSlow BreathingSwitzerland
-
Alexandra HospitalNot yet recruitingKidney Failure, Chronic
-
University of LincolnRecruitingWellbeing | Palliative Care | Virtual RealityUnited Kingdom
-
Bydgoszcz University of Science and TechnologyEnrolling by invitation
-
National Institute of General Medical Sciences...Completed
-
Shanghai Mental Health CenterNanjing XR-Oasis Technology Co., Ltd.RecruitingBipolar Disorder | Interventional Study | VRChina
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreRecruitingPain | Virtual Reality | Temporomandibular Disorder | PlaceboUnited States
-
Cornell UniversityCompletedPain ThresholdUnited States
-
Universitas AirlanggaTokyo University; Chiba UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartFondazione PoliambulanzaRecruiting