Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Ball Balancing

November 3, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Rhythmic Stabilization Versus Ball Balancing on Upper Extremity Function in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Spastic Cerebral Palsy (CP) is the leading cause of upper motor neuron syndrome (UMN) in children. The primary factors contributing to motor behavior disorders in these children are impairments in motor control and muscle strength. These impairments result in changes in muscle growth and hinder the development of motor skills, leading to reduced muscle force generation and decreased flexibility. Spastic cerebral palsy is the most prevalent type, affecting 77% of individuals with CP, and is caused by damage to the motor cortex and pyramidal tracts. The motor cortex is responsible for transmitting voluntary movement signals from the brain to the muscles. Characteristics of spastic cerebral palsy include stiff muscles (hypertonia), which can cause jerky and repetitive limb movements (spasticity). Additionally, individuals with CP often have difficulties in processing somatosensory and proprioceptive information. Proprioceptive training refers to interventions aimed at enhancing proprioceptive function to ultimately improve motor performance, a concept that has been explored in studies focused on sports injuries. In this study, we will utilize two proprioceptive exercises-rhythmic stabilization and ball balancing-to promote functional improvement in the upper extremities of children with spastic CP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There will be two groups: Group A will consist of 16 patients undergoing rhythmic stabilization, while Group B will also have 16 patients participating in ball balancing activities. Data will be collected both before and after the intervention to determine the most effective approach. Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS version 23.00.

This study will be a randomized clinical trial, with data collected from the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital (ULTH) and the Pakistan Society for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled (PSRD) in Lahore. A total of 32 patients will participate, equally divided into two groups through random allocation. The inclusion criteria will consist of children aged 5-12 with spastic CP, encompassing both genders. Patients with any neurological conditions, other orthopedic issues, a history of spine surgery, severe systemic disorders, psychiatric disorders, or neuromuscular disorders will be excluded from the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54700
        • Recruiting
        • Riphah International University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Masifah Kashif, MS*

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Spastic diplegic CP children age 6 to 12 years,
  • Each gender included
  • Grade 1 of spasticity according to modified Ashworth scale (21)
  • With normal I.Q. greater than 70 (assessed by psychologist),
  • Can follow commands(

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with any other neurological impairment
  • Children with audio visual impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rhythmic Stabilization group
The CP child will positions his/her upper extremity anywhere in its available range of motion and holds an isometric contraction. The physiotherapist will provide enough resistance to cause the child to react, but not enough to break the isometric contraction. As the child progresses, length of time of rhythmic stabilization increases, the therapist's resistance increases, and amount of contact area between therapist's hands and child's upper extremity decreases. The exercise program consisted of 30-minute sessions per week for six weeks

Rhythmic Stabilization Program for Children with Cerebral Palsy Objective: Enhance upper extremity strength and stability through rhythmic stabilization exercises.

Program Overview:

Duration: 30-minute sessions Frequency: Once per week for 6 weeks

Exercise Steps:

Positioning: The child positions their upper extremity within their available range of motion.

Isometric Contraction: The child holds an isometric contraction, maintaining the position without movement.

Therapist's Role: Apply resistance that is sufficient to elicit a reaction but not enough to disrupt the isometric contraction.

Progression: Gradually increase the duration of the isometric hold. Increase the amount of resistance applied. Decrease the contact area between the therapist's hands and the child's upper extremity to enhance stability challenges. Monitoring and Adjustments: Assess the child's ability to maintain the contraction and adapt the resistance and support as needed. Encourage the child's engagement.

Experimental: Ball Balancing group
Have the child balance on his/her hands on a 48-inch Gymnastic ball, first with eyes open, then closed. Progress from both hands on one large ball to each hand on separate balls and then to the weaker arm on one ball. Also, progress through the four body positions. With his/her eyes open, then closed. If he/she misses the position, he/she opens his/her eyes and actively moves to the desired position. Use a spotter, especially when doing this exercise for the first time or changing body positions, since the patient may fall off the Gymnastic ball. Start with one repetition of 10 seconds and progress to three to five repetitions of 60 seconds each and this will be done till 6 weeks

Ball Balancing Program Objective: Improve balance and stability. Equipment: 48-inch gymnastic ball

Program Details:

  • Duration: 6 weeks
  • Frequency: As needed

Steps:

  1. Initial Balance:

    • Eyes Open: Balance on hands for 10 seconds.
    • Progression: Increase to 3-5 repetitions of 60 seconds.
  2. Eyes Closed: Repeat the above exercise with eyes closed.
  3. Variations:

    • Both Hands on One Ball
    • Each Hand on Separate Balls
    • Weaker Arm on One Ball
  4. Body Positions: Progress through four body positions with eyes open, then closed.
  5. Correction: If the child misses a position, they open their eyes and reposition actively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
QUEST ( Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test)
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST) is a reliable and valid tool that assesses hand function and movement patterns in children with cerebral palsy. It can be used with children aged 6 to 12 years (23). The test is conducted in a play environment and consists of 34 activity items. The test assesses four domains: Dissociated movements, Grasp, Protective extension. Reliability is 0.96 and validity is 0.84.
6 weeks
SHUEE Scale
Time Frame: 6 weeks
The Shriners Hospital for Children Upper Extremity Evaluation (SHUEE) is a video-based tool for the assessment of upper extremity function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. This tool includes spontaneous functional analysis and Effects of Rhythmic Stabilization versus Ball Balancing on Spastic CP 3dynamic positional analysis and assesses the ability to perform grasp and release. The validity is 0.47 and reliability is 0.99
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Masifah Kashif, MS*, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 2, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spastic Cerebral Palsy (sCP)

Clinical Trials on Rhythmic Stabilization

Subscribe