Neuropsychological Profiles and Musical Engagement in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease (MUSENGAGE)

March 14, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Observational Pilot Study of Neuropsychological Profiles and Musical Engagement in Parkinson's and Alzheimer's Disease. What Are the Effects of Mnestic or Hedonic Impairment on Emotion, Reminiscence and Musical Enjoyment

The goal of this Multicenter observational pilot study is to Compare the specifics of musical engagement (behaviors related to music in everyday life) in subjects aged over 60 with Alzheimer s disease, Parkinson s disease and control subjects.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. The description of different profiles of musical engagement in early-stage AD, in PD and in healthy elderly subjects.
  2. The extent of executive, mnestic and hedonic dysfunctions will impact differently on emotional engagement, autobiographical evocation and sensitivity to musical reward, and will therefore enable distinct profiles to be drawn up.

Participants will have an intervention consisting of an interview with a neuropsychologist lasting approximately 2 hours, including :

  • A semi-structured interview to check the participants eligibility and gather demographic data.
  • Neuropsychological tests and questionnaires will then be administered.
  • A relative of the study participant will help complete questionnaires.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Music therapy appears to be highly relevant as a Non-Medication Intervention in Alzheimer s (AD) and Parkinson s disease (PD). It is said to reduce depressive symptoms following music therapy sessions in dementia . With regard to Parkinson s disease, music therapy brings benefits in terms of motor skills, communication, breathing and emotional aspects. Reviews point to the need to differentiate beneficial effects according to different pathologies.

To date, no study has investigated the evolution of sensitivity to musical reward in AD. Furthermore, no study has discriminated the evolution of musical engagement in several neurodegenerative pathologies.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Hérault
      • Montpellier, Hérault, France, 34000
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Montpellier Seniors' Association
        • Contact:
      • Montpellier, Hérault, France, 34295
      • Montpellier, Hérault, France, 34295
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHU de Montpellier - CMRR
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

General inclusion criteria:

  • 60 years and older
  • French-speaking and volunteering for the study
  • Living at home with a relative

Alzheimer's disease inclusion criteria:

  • Biological diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease according to NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (McKhann et al., 1984)
  • MMSE greater than or equal to 20

Inclusion criteria Parkinson's disease :

  • Diagnosis of Idiopathic Parkinson's disease
  • MMSE greater than or equal to 20

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No known neurological pathologies (epilepsy and other non-degenerative CNS diseases) or psychiatric disorders (chronic psychosis and psychotic episodes)
  • Autistic disorders
  • History of stroke or head trauma
  • Unstable medical condition (cancer)
  • Subject unable to read and/or write
  • Hearing impairment without hearing aids
  • Refusal of consent after information
  • Persons unable to give consent, research carried out in emergency situations, etc.)
  • Non-affiliation with a social security scheme
  • Person deprived of liberty (by judicial or administrative decision, or forced hospitalization)
  • Person under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, legal protection)
  • Person participating in another research project with an exclusion period still in progress

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: patient with early-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD)
patients followed up at the Centre Mémoire de Ressources et de Recherche (CMRR) of Montpellier, over 60 with Alzheimer's disease who have cognitive impairment based on an MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) ≥ 20 and live at home with a relative

It will take place either at the hospital or at the participant's home.

This interview will consist of :

  • socio-demographic data collection
  • neuropsychological tests:

    • MMSE test (Mini Mental State Examination) cognitive function
    • RL-RI-16 test (16-item free recall/indexed recall test)
    • BECS test (Semantic knowledge assessment battery )
    • WCST test (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test )
    • Musical Cognition Test
    • Help from the participant's relative to answer certain questions, in particular the MuseEQ-24 questionnaire

The participant answers questionnaires:

  • Questionnaire MusEQ-24 self reported (Music Engagement Questionnaire)
  • Questionnaire BMRQ (Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire)
  • Questionnaire SHAPS (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale)
  • Questionnaire LARS (Lille's Apathy Rating Scale)
  • Questionnaire PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items)
Active Comparator: patients with parkinson's disease (PD)
patients followed up at the Center Expert Parkinson of Montpellier (CEPMo), over 60 with Parkinson's disease who have cognitive impairment based on an MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) ≥ 20 and live at home with a relative

It will take place either at the hospital or at the participant's home.

This interview will consist of :

  • socio-demographic data collection
  • neuropsychological tests:

    • MMSE test (Mini Mental State Examination) cognitive function
    • RL-RI-16 test (16-item free recall/indexed recall test)
    • BECS test (Semantic knowledge assessment battery )
    • WCST test (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test )
    • Musical Cognition Test
    • Help from the participant's relative to answer certain questions, in particular the MuseEQ-24 questionnaire

The participant answers questionnaires:

  • Questionnaire MusEQ-24 self reported (Music Engagement Questionnaire)
  • Questionnaire BMRQ (Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire)
  • Questionnaire SHAPS (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale)
  • Questionnaire LARS (Lille's Apathy Rating Scale)
  • Questionnaire PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items)
Active Comparator: Healthy control
Subjects aged over 60, with no known neurodegenerative disease, living at home with a relative in the Hérault département.

It will take place either at the hospital or at the participant's home.

This interview will consist of :

  • socio-demographic data collection
  • neuropsychological tests:

    • MMSE test (Mini Mental State Examination) cognitive function
    • RL-RI-16 test (16-item free recall/indexed recall test)
    • BECS test (Semantic knowledge assessment battery )
    • WCST test (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test )
    • Musical Cognition Test
    • Help from the participant's relative to answer certain questions, in particular the MuseEQ-24 questionnaire

The participant answers questionnaires:

  • Questionnaire MusEQ-24 self reported (Music Engagement Questionnaire)
  • Questionnaire BMRQ (Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire)
  • Questionnaire SHAPS (Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale)
  • Questionnaire LARS (Lille's Apathy Rating Scale)
  • Questionnaire PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of the specificities of musical engagement (i.e., music-related behaviors in daily life) in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and among a population of healthy old adults.
Time Frame: Baseline
Global score of informant version of the Music engagement Questionnaire (MusEQ-24) a 24 items questionnaire that delivers an overall score (ranging from 0 to 120) as well as a score for each of its 6 dimensions (ranging from 0 to 5) of musical engagement: Emotion, Daily life, Social, Response, Preferences and Identity. The higher the score, the greater the level of musical engagement.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of global cognition between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scoring from 0 (minimum) to 30 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better semantic memory function.
Baseline
Comparison of Executive Function between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) which assesses executive functioning globally with a rule deduction task. (Scoring from 0 to 6 for the number of correct categories and 0 to 48 for the number of mistakes). The higher the number of categories, the higher the executive functioning. The higher the number of errors, the lower the executive functioning.
Baseline
Comparison of Episodic Memory Function between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Free and Cued Recall Test (RL/RI-16), a 16 items tests scoring from 0 (minimum) to 48 (maximum), with higher scores indicating better memory recall.
Baseline
Comparison of Semantic Memory Function between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline

Recognition subtest of the Battery for the Assessment of Semantic Knowledge (BECS) scoring from 0 to 40.

Higher scores indicate stronger semantic memory abilities, with lower scores reflecting potential deficits in semantic knowledge.

Baseline
Comparison of Musical Cognition between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Test of Orientation in Music Therapy (TOM), scoring from 0 to 34 Higher scores represent better musical cognition abilities, while lower scores may indicate reduced cognitive processing of musical information.
Baseline
Comparison of Semantic Musical Memory between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline

The extension of the Test of Orientation in Music Therapy (TOM), scoring from 24 to 120.

Higher scores represent better musical cognition abilities, while lower scores may indicate reduced cognitive processing of musical information.

Baseline
Comparison of Sensitivity to musical reward between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire BRMQ, (scoring 20 to 100, the lower the score the lower the sensitivity to musical reward). It contains 20 items scored on a 5-point Likert scale. It contains 5 dimensions: musical search, emotional evocation, mood regulation, social reward and sensorimotor.
Baseline
Comparison of Memory recall during music listening reward between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
MusEQ-24 item 22, hetero-reported (scoring 0 to 5, the lower the score the lower memory recall)
Baseline
Comparison of emotional experience during music listening during music listening reward between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
MusEQ-24 Emotion subscale, hetero-reported (scoring 0 to 5, the lower the score the lower the emotional experience)
Baseline
Comparison of Hedonic function reward between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline

Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), a 14 items scale, Score Range: 0 (minimum) to 14 (maximum).

Higher scores suggest anhedonia, with lower scores indicating a greater capacity for experiencing pleasure.

Baseline
Comparison of Affective blunting between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline

Emotional intensity subscale of Lille's Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) a 33 items scale. The LARS is divided into 9 subscales, each scoring -4 to +4.

Higher scores reflect greater affective blunting (reduced emotional intensity), while lower scores suggest a more typical range of emotional responses.

Baseline
Comparison of Depression symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
Patient Health Questionnaire 9 items (PHQ-9). Score Range: 0 (minimum) to 27 (maximum), each item is rated from 0 to 3 Score Interpretation: Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms, with lower scores suggesting fewer depressive symptoms or none at all.
Baseline
Correlation between the Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire (BMRQ) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between the Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire (BMRQ) and the 16-item free recall/indexed recall test (RL/RI- 16) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire (BMRQ) and Lille's Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) subscale for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between the Barcelona Reward Music Questionnaire (BMRQ) and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between the Emotion Subscale of the MusEQ 24 hetero-reported version and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between the Emotion subscale of the MusEQ 24 hetero-reported version and the 16-item free recall/indexed recall test (RL/RI- 16) for each group.
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between the Emotion subscale of the MusEQ 24 hetero-reported version and the Lille's Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) subscale for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between the Emotion Subscale of the MusEQ 24 hetero-reported version and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between Item 22 of the MusEQ-24 hetero-reported version and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between item 22 of the MusEQ-24 hetero-reported version with 16-item free recall/indexed recall test (RL/RI- 16) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between Item 22 of the MusEQ-24 hetero-reported version and the Lille's Apathy Rating Scale (LARS) subscale for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
Correlation between Item 22 of the MusEQ-24 hetero-reported version and the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) for each group
Time Frame: Baseline
correlation coefficient R
Baseline
The comparison of self- and hetero-questionnaires will be carried out within each group for each MUseQ24 dimension
Time Frame: Baseline

Compare the results of the self-reported and hetero-reported versions of the Musical Engagement Questionnaire.

Global score of informant version of the Music engagement Questionnaire (MusEQ-24) a 24 items questionnaire that delivers an overall score (ranging from 0 to 120) as well as a score for each of its 6 dimensions (ranging from 0 to 5) of musical engagement: Emotion, Daily life, Social, Response, Preferences and Identity. The higher the score, the greater the level of musical engagement.

Baseline
Comparison of Self-assessed musical engagement between Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and healthy elderly groups
Time Frame: Baseline
MusEQ-24, self-reported Global score of informant version of the Music engagement Questionnaire (MusEQ-24) a 24 items questionnaire that delivers an overall score (ranging from 0 to 120) as well as a score for each of its 6 dimensions (ranging from 0 to 5) of musical engagement: Emotion, Daily life, Social, Response, Preferences and Identity. The higher the score, the greater the level of musical engagement.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karim BENNYS, MD, University Hospital, Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer Disease, Early Onset

Clinical Trials on neuropsychologist interview

Subscribe