Assessment of Upper Cross Syndrome and Cervicogenic Headache in Smart Phone User

November 13, 2024 updated by: Jilan Adel yousef

ASSESSMENT of UPPER CROSS SYNDROME and CERVICOGENIC HEADACHE AMONG ADDICTIVE SMART PHONE PHYSICAL THERAPY STUDENTS

the purpose of this study was to assess upper cross syndrome and cervicogenic headache between addictive and non- addictive smartphone usage among university physical therapy students.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

"Smartphone addiction" is a special type of technological addiction. users are drawn to it Even when there isn't a pressing need to use a smartphone. In a study of 2367 university students in Riyadh, the findings showed that 27.2% of participants used their smartphones for more than eight hours a day. When using a smartphone, a person may stay still for extended periods of time or perform certain movements repeatedly, which puts an excessive amount of static load on the neck and shoulder regions. The most common complaints on smartphones were related to neck pain, with prevalence rates ranging from 17.3% to 67.8%. This is because using a smartphone for extended periods of time with flexed-necked posture increases the activity of the upper trapezius and splenius capitis muscles, which can cause pain in the neck and shoulders. upper crossed syndrome (USC) is muscle imbalance between tightness and weakness in the neck, shoulders, and upper back which is a common postural dysfunction pattern. The main UCS feature is forward head posture (FHP) which is a condition occurs when the head shifts from its usual position and moves forward from the cervical spine. Postural abnormalities associated with UCS include change in the activation of the scapula muscles result in scapular instability and mechanical dysfunction in the neck, which can exacerbate pain in the neck ,upper back and headaches. The International Headache Society (IHS) defines cervicogenic headache (CGH) as a secondary type of headache brought on by abnormalities of the cervical spine or any of the bone, soft tissue, or disc components that make up the cervical spine. A recent study evaluated the frequency of cervicogenic headaches caused by excessive use of smart devices found 56% of students experienced cervicogenic headaches as a result of using smart devices excessively and adopting poor posture. So the aim of this study to assess upper cross syndrome and cervicogenic headache between addictive and non-addictive smartphone usage among university physical therapy students.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt
        • Faculty of Physical Therapy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

smart phone users from faculty of physical therapy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Asymptomatic students with normal healthy state 2. Age group between 18-24 years 3. Body mass index between (18-24.9). 4. Addictive smart phone users with score over 31 for male and 33 for female students in smart phone addiction scale (Kwon et al., 2013).

    5. Minimum of 25 text messages or emails per day, browsing the Internet and/or playing games for more than one hour a day using their smartphone (Mustafaoglu et al., 2021).

    1. Headache developed in temporal relation to the onset of cervical disorder or appearance of the lesion.
    2. Headache significantly improved or resolved in parallel with improvement in or resolution of the cervical disorder or lesion.
    3. Reduced cervical range of motion , and headache was made significantly worse by provocative maneuvers.
    4. Headache abolished following diagnostic blockade of a cervical structure or its nerve supply

      Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. History of Cervical Trauma or Surgery (Jung et al., 2016). 2. Neck, shoulder, upper back, lower back, elbow, or wrist-hand musculoskeletal trauma (Lee et al., 2015).

    3. Congenital deformities 4. Serious surgical or neurological diseases 5. Limb injuries 6. Involvement in a formal physical activity program 7. Cervical Spondylosis. 8. Cervical Radiculopathy (Pathan et al., 2021). 9. Shoulder, neck, and back muscle injuries in the past month (Daniel et al., 2022).

    10. Idiopathic spinal deformity (Elnahhas et al., 2018).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
addictive smart phone group
addictive smart phone users with cervicogenic headache
Mobile application APECS v. 6.2.0. is used to assess upper body posture during standing from back side and right side.
non addictive smart phone group
non addictive smart phone users not complaining of cervicogenic headache
Mobile application APECS v. 6.2.0. is used to assess upper body posture during standing from back side and right side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
upper cross syndrome angles assessment in degrees
Time Frame: 3 monthes
cranio-vertebral angle ,rounded shoulder and Thoracic kyphosis angles .
3 monthes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cervical range of motion in degrees and flexion rotation test in degree
Time Frame: 3 months
features of cervicogenic headache
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: enas fawzy, professor, professor of physical therapy for orthopedic diseases

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postural; Defect

Clinical Trials on Smartphone application AI Posture Evaluation and Correction System (APECS)

Subscribe