Combined Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Postural Control in Elderly

March 9, 2025 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Combined Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cerebral Cortex and Cerebellum on Postural Control in Elderly Population

The current study aims to determine the effects of combination stimulation (M1 Cortex+ Cerebellum) along with balance training (X-box with Kinect) on postural control in elderly population and to compare the combined stimulation (M1+CbS) with individual motor cortex, cerebellar or sham stimulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The current study has been designed to investigate the potential effects of short term transcranial direct current stimulation on motor cortex and cerebellum both simultaneously and to document any additional benefits over each individual stimulations (M1 cortex stimulation, cerebellar stimulation or sham stimulation). Patients will be receiving the transcranial direct current stimulation combined with non-immersive virtual reality using Xbox 360 with Kinect in each group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46060
        • Railway General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Both genders
  • Healthy elderly patients
  • Age group of ≥ 60 years
  • Fluent in reading and speaking Urdu language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have any congenital/Acquired walking or standing difficulty due to certain circumstances won't be included in the healthy adults group.
  • Patients with Osteo-Arthritis (OA)
  • Patients with cerebellar issues or issues such as vertigo with standing and walking etc.
  • Individuals who had significant dysarthria or aphasia that might impair understanding of speech or verbal instruction
  • Cognitive/communication impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: M1 Stimulation Group (MSG)
For M1, the anodal electrode will be placed over M1 region while the cathodal electrode will be placed over the right contralateral supraorbital region.
For M1, the anodal electrode will be placed over M1 region while the cathodal electrode will be placed over the right contralateral supraorbital region.
Experimental: M1 + cerebellar stimulation group
In M1, the anodal electrode will be placed over the M1 region while the cathodal electrode will be placed over the right contralateral supraorbital region whereas simultaneously for the CbSG, active anodal electrode will be placed over the cerebellum bilaterally about 1-2 cm below inion occipital protuberance, whereas the returning cathodal electrode will be placed on right buccinator muscle
In M1, the anodal electrode will be placed over the M1 region while the cathodal electrode will be placed over the right contralateral supraorbital region whereas simultaneously for the CbSG, active anodal electrode will be placed over the cerebellum bilaterally about 1-2 cm below inion occipital protuberance, whereas the returning cathodal electrode will be placed on right buccinator muscle.
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation group (SSG)
In Sham stimulation, Electrodes will be placed according to M1 Stimulation i.e., the anodal electrode will be placed over M1 region while the cathodal electrode will be placed over the right contralateral supraorbital region.
In Sham stimulation, Electrodes will be placed according to M1 Stimulation i.e., the anodal electrode will be placed over M1 region while the cathodal electrode will be placed over the right contralateral supraorbital region.
Other: Cerebellar Stimulation Group (CbSG)
For the CbSG, active anodal electrode will be placed over the cerebellum bilaterally about 1-2 cm below inion occipital protuberance, whereas the returning cathodal electrode will be placed on right buccinator muscle
For the Cerebellar Stimulation Group, active anodal electrode will be placed over the cerebellum bilaterally about 1-2 cm below the inion occipital protuberance, whereas the returning cathodal electrode will be placed on right buccinator muscle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg balance scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
Berg Balance Scale is considered gold standard for balance assessment. Patients are asked to complete 14 tasks, and each task is rated by an examiner on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (cannot perform) to 4 (normal performance). Elements of the test are supposed to be representative of daily activities that require balance, including tasks such as sitting, standing, leaning over, and stepping. Some tasks are rated according to the quality of the performance of the task, whereas the time taken to complete the task is measured for other tasks. Overall scores can range from 0 (severely impaired balance) to 56 (excellent balance).
3 weeks
Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is a reliable, cost-effective, safe, and time-efficient way to evaluate overall functional mobility. The TUG has a high correlation with other proven tests that measure pure gait speed for longer lengths such as a 10-m walk.
3 weeks
Bestest Balance Evaluation-Systems Test (Bestest)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a balance assessment that distinguishes 6 aspects of balance ability. Biomechanical constraints, limits of stability, anticipatory adjustments, postural responses, sensory orientation, and stability in gait. BESTest total score (ICC=0.98) and the BESTest sections (ICC between 0.85 and 0.96) have excellent intra-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability for the total score was excellent (ICC=0.93) and, for the sections, it ranged between 0.71 and 0.94.
3 weeks
Twenty-five feet walk test (25FWT)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The T25-FW is a quantitative mobility and leg function performance test based on a timed 25-walk. The patient is directed to one end of a clearly marked 25-foot course and is instructed to walk 25 feet as quickly as possible, but safely. The time is calculated from the initiation of the instruction to start and ends when the patient has reached the 25-foot mark. The task is immediately administered again by having the patient walk back the same distance. Patients may use assistive devices when doing this task. Administration time will vary depending upon the ability of the patient. Total administration time should be approximately 1-5 minutes. The T25-FW has high inter-rater and test-retest reliability and shows evidence of good concurrent validity.
3 weeks
Six-minute walk test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 3 weeks
The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. It is a simple, non-invasive, low-cost and reproducible exercise test used to evaluate endurance during self-paced, submaximal walk by measuring the distance walked within 6 minutes (6MWD) along a flat, straight course with a hard surface. The 6-min walk had good test-retest reliability (88 < R < 94), particularly when a practice trial preceded the test trial.
3 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arshad Nawaz Malik, Riphah International University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 1, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Summaiya Ishtiaq/01899

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postural; Defect

Clinical Trials on M1 Stimulation Group

Subscribe